Views : 11,605
Genre: Gaming
Date of upload: Aug 15, 2023 ^^
Rating : 4.835 (33/767 LTDR)
RYD date created : 2024-03-11T08:37:25.225018Z
See in json
Top Comments of this video!! :3
the restaurant analogy is a great point. The Steam review system isn't about giving the game a scored number on the quality of the game, it is a macro view on rating whether a game is worth spending time into or not, and Blizzard has proven time and time again they don't respect and value the players
78 |
Itâs the executives and upper managementâs fault of what happened. Not the core of the dev team. I doubt all the 3D artists etc really deserve this hate. But no content creator really wants to word things out that way we just blame the developers bc itâs easier than blaming the right people and thatâs Activision/Blizzard executives but mostly activision. Activision uses blizzard as its scapegoat.
6 |
lets be clear: The food in that restaurant analogy is almost good.
The problem is that you, the customer, know 5 other restaurants that have food just as good if not better, cheaper and you dont have to wait for so long.
Yes, maybe it is the only restaurant that serves a specific type of food, but when id rather stay hungry (do my laundry) than eat there, there is a problem (or a lot of them).
And considering the player numbers on steam being on a steady decline (and a fast one at that) I would say other I am not the only one to feel this way.
3 |
I also love the game but I think they need to lower the cost of skins cause 20 dollars for 1 skin is a lot , I could buy a whole ass game with that money and even a full AAA game that came out last year, having heroes locked behind battle pass is just a dick move and it is frustrating for players.
and having to pay 15$ for a one hour of gameplay of PvE is bullshit and the fact that you cant buy it with coins that you already bought is just unbelivable.
PS loved the video hope you get more viewsâĽ
32 |
âOverwatch 2 went through four straight seasons of the devs lying and hyping up the PvE and then rug pulling it. So that they could then repackage salvaged missions into the predatory monetisation system, that was hollowly used as an excuse to launch OW2 in the first place.â
If you think the system is predatory, why are you spending money on it?
1 |
saying review bombing the game now will ruin its future is such a shit take, and the best example of this is no mans sky, if the devs can stick by the game and actually make changes that benefit the community, the reviews will show it.
i understand its a live service game, and not run by an indie company that cares about the product as much, but i truly believe that if they actually fix the game, the reviews will change as well. hell they even have a recent reviews section in steam to point out what the current consensus is relative to the overall stuff in case patches make the game good/worse.
the devs need to hear player dissatisfaction. cos if they dont itll only get worse
2 |
@sirbossk
8 months ago
It's deserved. It's not the community's job to give Blizzard the benefit of the doubt, and it's not the content creator's job to prevent negative sentiment from seeping through the community. It's Blizzard's job to make their community feel good about the game, and it's no one's fault but theirs that they're failing badly at it. It's called public relations and brand image, and they chose to exchange it for short-term profit. It may not be the exact perfect use case for the review system, but does it really matter? That's how they've made the community feel through their decisions, and the community is just expressing that. That's it.
70 |