Views : 130,939
Genre: Entertainment
Date of upload: May 24, 2020 ^^
Rating : 4.961 (88/8,909 LTDR)
RYD date created : 2022-03-17T12:48:33.813607Z
See in json
Top Comments of this video!! :3
I feel compelled to say thank you for this!!
I have so many guy friends who refused to watch this movie cause it was for girls. They would watched Parasite and Uncut Gems and sing their praises. And I love those movies too; but I can't take someone seriously when they just disregard a movie completely because its about women.
472 |
I loved the video but just one minor thing, laurie doesn't marry amy because he can't have jo, in the novel his feelings actually shift and he realizes that he loved jo as a sister and that his feelings for Amy were just as strong but completely different. Jo herself says so in the movie and only rethinks her refusal of the proposal when she starts to feel lonely but quickly realizes that just because she wants to be loved doesn't mean she loves laurie
260 |
Great job, but a point I'm surprised you didn't touch on was how leaning further into the 2nd half of the book than the other adaptations balances the perspectives of the sisters the way most of the other adaptations didn't and it finally gives Amy her due. Since Jo is generally the fan favorite, her story and character receive more priority and attention over the other sisters in adaptation. Meg usually just kind of goes away after her wedding and Amy ends up being the bratty sister that viewers and readers dislike because of her bratty behavior as a kid and undercutting the Jo and Laurie romance. Expanding Amy's and Beth's arcs as adults finally balances the scale and forces us to look closer at the stories gender politics. Amy didn't marry Laurie because she wanted to spite Jo, she did it because financially, her family needed a lifeline and Jo was certainly not going to go that route.
67 |
I didn't know that the timeline was confusing to some until I watched this video, and that reminded me of a personal anecdote that still baffles me to this day.
I saw "Saving Mr. Banks" in the theater with a guy I was dating at the time. The bulk of the film cuts between P.L. Travers in Los Angeles during the development of "Mary Poppins" and flashbacks of her childhood (and much like "Little Women," the transitions between the timelines and the visual differences differentiating the two are incredibly obvious). More than halfway through the runtime, during one of the flashback scenes, my date leaned over and asked, "Why do they keep showing this family? Who are these other people supposed to be?"
I still have no idea how I held back from laughing and/or slamming my head onto the armrest.
63 |
I think you really hit the nail on the head Patrick - this pretty much confirms for me why Gerwig's Little Women is, at least to me, the best adaptation of *any* source material I've ever seen. Adaptations shouldn't just be about copy-and-pasting the source material into a new medium, but re-working it and making them sing in the new medium and for a new crop of audiences. And Gerwig DID that!
18 |
@michaelcavanaugh971
3 years ago
two timelines are confusing! unless a man does it, then it’s handsome and smart and brilliant and he gets an oscar
1K |