Views : 13,456
Genre: Entertainment
Date of upload: Jul 26, 2023 ^^
Rating : 4.866 (20/578 LTDR)
RYD date created : 2024-04-11T17:43:37.413732Z
See in json
Top Comments of this video!! :3
The CSB is my main translation. I use it for Scripture reading, memory, and preaching and teaching. I use other translations / revisions on a regular basis for study comparison etc (NASB, ESV, LAB, NLT, NET, NIV). I read King James for its beauty occasionally. I tell folks the best translation for them is the one they will read and apply on a regular basis
28 |
Love it! And love Pastor Everhard as well. The CSB is something I got really excited about in 2017 when it first came out as an update to the HCSB. I think of it as a step between the ESV and NIV on the imaginary spectrum, but where it is more dynamic, it does so to prevent misapplication of the text. It looks far more formal in places where the words are clear to today's audience. It takes away the archaic mystique so to say.
14 |
I love both Matthew Everhard and Tim Frisch's channels. I agree it'd be good if Pastor Everhard could give more consideration to the CSB. Also, I think one irony is that Pastor Everhard had the CSB vs. the LSB, but the main reason he waived off the CSB in favor of the LSB was because he didn't really see a need for it or why it even exists. The irony is that the same criticism could be applied to the LSB! The LSB is in essence a revision to the NASB95 produced by scholars at The Master's Seminary (of John MacArthur's ministry). Now the LSB is a solid translation, and I have no major problems with the LSB, but one can also ask the same question that Pastor Everhard asks about the CSB about the LSB: is there really that much of a need for the LSB? I'm sure there are stalwart defenders of the LSB including John MacArthur and most at TMS, but for example see Mark Ward's article "A Rising Tide Sinks All Boats: The Legacy Standard Bible and Stewarding the Church's Trust" for a counterpoint. Again, I appreciate the LSB and the CSB, and both translations are solid, but all I'm saying is that the same criticism Pastor Everhard levels against the CSB could be leveled against the LSB too.
17 |
My wife and me were doing our readings through the Bible late last year. She loves her CSB bible. And I was using my NIV bible (it says 1984 version) along side. When we went through the readings, I found differences from the NIV compared to the CSB bible that were different to me. That is to say, the CSB , for me, had much more clarity and not as vague as the NIV. But thatās just my opinion. And, needless to say, Iām not a bible scholar, and this is how I felt reading in comparison.
4 |
@adkDinoB
9 months ago
Our church moved to the CSB more than two years ago and it has been invaluable to us making disciples for Christ. Itās accurate, relevant, and understandable for new and growing Christians.
34 |