Views : 44,930
Genre: News & Politics
Date of upload: Premiered Apr 24, 2024 ^^
Rating : 4.859 (35/958 LTDR)
RYD date created : 2024-05-19T03:52:53.377786Z
See in json
Top Comments of this video!! :3
I generally agree with Ava in that going after any aspect of someone's appearance is lowest-common-denominator and lacks heft. However, I think it's important to remember that no amount of Labor minding their P's and Q's will induce the Tories into fighting an election honorably or actually engaging on the issues.
125 |
Angela Rayner surprised the Tories today by stealing their thunder by addressing the issue of housing. She successfully countered Dowden's prepared attacks and left him with no ammunition to respond. Dowden looked dazed and struggled to deliver his lines, which were poorly received.
I am surprised at the split at the table regarding Angela Rayner's comment about the "Pint-sized loser". There was no fact-checking done, but if there had been, it would have been found that Rayner cleverly used the words of a former Conservative minister who had described Rishi Sunak as a "Pint-sized loser". The minister in question is Nadine Dorries. It is interesting to note that, when Boris Johnson was Prime Minister, he would often pair Sunak with 6ft + treasury ministers to make him look even smaller.
11 |
I don't get this brushing off of the "pint-sized" thing. Would it be OK for a politician to call Therese Coffey a "fat loser"? Or, god forbid, call Sunak a "brown-skinned loser"? After all, that's just their appearance, right? So it's OK? Of course it's not.
The problem is that it implies being short is inherently a bad thing, and it associates Sunak's height with his political failures, which isn't fair. He's failed politically because he's bad at politics and his party has shit policies.
22 |
@cook1e2000robturnerxG
3 weeks ago
4 leather jackets? Champagne socialists
35 |