Views : 119,123
Genre: Science & Technology
Date of upload: Feb 19, 2023 ^^
Rating : 4.888 (112/3,901 LTDR)
RYD date created : 2024-05-04T02:52:50.871484Z
See in json
Top Comments of this video!! :3
In a half asleep dream imagining, I pictured this: Blackholes not only Frame drag the "grid" of spacetime around in a kind of torque, they also Frame SUCK the spacetime inward as well. So the expansion of spacetime is the pulling of the 'sheets' down each big black hole- so the 'grid' between black holes gets stretched, and thats the redshift we see, as opposed to any actual expansion.
13 |
this was my first time checking out both your channel & your content; truly I am so grateful that the algorithm allowed me to stumble upon your neck of the Youtube forest because so often I get the feeling that both the algorithm + Youtube are secretly plotting ways to either drive ppl to new even more insane levels of insidiousness by putting only the fringyest of fringe theory-styled programing that while i admit that can be entertaining..., ultimately though it's not a very worthwhile undertaking in most situations & it would become a choice between watching something just to kill some time or being pleasantly surprised by what the algorithm has dished out to me at the just the right time when i'm in just the right kind of receptive headspace so as to actually harken unto your very informative yet at the same time completely entertaining proving that once again deeply intense concepts don't have to be presented in a stark, sterile & mind-numbingly overbearing in tone:body-green-covering-eyes: to the point of feeling as if you don't adhere to what the content creator is providing; well then damned be ye all , the fact you've found a way to remove the pretensions that seem somehow inherent in the subject matter on a molecular level therefore the one that presents these concepts, ideas & theories must also be , well you & a few other amazingly gifted individuals on this platform choose to do these things your own way & at your own pace....Bravo & kudos ! Stumbling onto this video turned a blaise day into a now super-charged & most awesome day ...thanx for that...& i'm looking forward to future uploads¬KEEP UP THE GREAT JOB YOU'RE DOING until next time L8rsk8r🛹😋🤘
3 |
Sabine Hossenfelder pooh-poohs this in her latest Science News video, saying "I really think physicists keep screwing themselves over by calling this [Cosmological] constant Dark Energy" and "It seems likely to me that soon enough someone else will come up with a perfectly mundane explanation for the data and you'll never hear of this idea again." I give her more credence and weight than that latest headline-grabber.
2 |
Thanks for this Nice, Simple and Elegant explanation of complex aspects of our universe. I wonder if our scientists ever consider the existence of energy/mater in dimensions that we can’t see. Mathematically any number of dimensions can be modeled but we are trapped into 3 dimensions (or 4th, considering time), so technically we can’t understand what could really be in other potential dimensions. At the most we could only perceive weird things happening in our universe as a consequence of us touching the plane (space) of higher dimensions. I would love to see a video of Dr Ben about other dimensions and how scientists understand this. Congratulations for this channel and for making science available to the general public.
11 |
Thank you for producing this video. 7:00, my understanding is that a neutron star/black hole is not produced by the force of gravity in a supernova, but rather due to implosion. The explosion is extremely powerful, but there is a medium point in the star where the matter just cannot escape fast enough (i.e. explosion), so the forces causes matter inside the medium point i.e. the core, as said, becomes a neutron star or, if more mass, a black hole.
2 |
Very interesting video which makes a nice complement to Sabine's video that highlights a number of issues with these papers. My main question is who to be sure this is causation not just correlation (which I believe the authors also highlighted as an unresolved issue with their paper) Also, when you say "in a phenomena called red shift" at 2:15 did you not mean a phenomenon, or were there more than 1 phenomena you were meaning to highlight? Thank you
2 |
@DrBenMiles
1 year ago
@DrBecky has a great critical review of this breakthrough. It's her field and I'd recommend checking it out: https://youtu.be/3gg1OS435UE
38 |