Views : 27,313
Genre: Education
Date of upload: Oct 4, 2022 ^^
Rating : 4.637 (146/1,465 LTDR)
RYD date created : 2024-01-19T22:37:57.712457Z
See in json
Top Comments of this video!! :3
Empathy and justice are definitely human impulses, but they are not our primary ones (though we flatter ourselves to think so). The lust for power and greed are much stronger. Some of us go for the grand prize of them all: moral superiority (“I’m a good person and you are not”). For all our advances, we still haven’t got the slightest idea what to do with evil: what is it and what do we do about it? All we know for certain is that it belongs to the “other” and not to “us”. Thus, we play an eternal game of hot potato.
105 |
We need more channels like yours. Idk about others, but one of the reasons why I trust and listen to you and what you have to say on these more pop stories is because you have already built a catalogue of video essays on more academic subjects and have shown that you can dig deep and articulate what you have seen. But you never go full on cultist/extremist when sharing these ideas as if they were the end all be all. You are not a pusher of YOUR ideas, but a pusher of ideas (that interest you). For sure we cannot escape the fact that a part of you is always embedded, but i feel your opinion is never centrefold. And for that, you are invaluable, trusted and listened by me with care.
62 |
Great stuff as always.
I've lost a friend while trying to make that point. Early on in the history of this debate. I always wondered how so many of us were able to interpret a certain event as a systemic social disaster while others considered it an intentional social treachery. And then you would switch roles for another, very similar social event. How are we so fragile in our mental rigor?
It reminds me of the question raised by Dave Chappelle "how old is fifteen really?", where he raises the simple question of the double standard.
I feel that it puts more weight behind the idea that to deny the deterministic part of the explanation of human behavior is to enforce a moral battle between theories with different starting biases. The refusal to restrain a political or moral engagement during social commentary is an issue because it pins down two identical thought trajectories against one another. It makes enemies out of two similar minded people who would've otherwise been able to have great discussions with cooperative conclusions.
Wish you the best continuation as always.
41 |
Thank you, so glad to hear your point of view as it seems near impossible to find content that is not tainted in some way when it comes to this topic. I have found the tribal nature of this "culture war" to be exhausting and it is a breath of fresh air to hear an unemotional and unbiased analysis, because at its core it is really a fascinating development in collective psychology.
1 |
Great content as always, I have also noticed a change when off social media. I used to have 5 different social media apps and I have narrowed down to 2 (YouTube and Facebook). Not only can I think more clear but also make time to focus on my goals and develop better critical thinking skills. Thanks to on content like yours I strive to be more knowledgeable in the political, but more importantly philosophical sphere. Thank you for all that you do and keep up the great work my friend!
|
Thank God that even with the rise in social media, there are authentic voices among the chorus (that would be YOU) reminding us to view life from a better angle.
Your video reminded me of Postman's "Amusing ourselves to death" book that I read when it came out in the mid-1980s. In the book, the author explained how media (radio and TV at the time) shortened our attention span and allowed others to program our thinking. The book was so interesting and scary because you could see the reality that you hadn't noticed in your day-to-day life.
Now, it's 2022, and you point out the insanity once again.
With the 24 hr news cycle and social media, it's easier than ever to program or amuse the masses. In this newer hyper-social version, we all align in camps and war against the other team. We are entertained, stressed, addicted to the likes, and of course, we stay distracted and manageable because we let others "think" for us.
I am sure the insanity of our system was glaringly evident after stepping away for a bit. So I'm happy you are addressing this and giving us some interesting insights.
The story of the child making fun of the man just so he could get attention was the perfect analogy for what you were about to explain. The cultural blaming is childish, stupid, and meant to garner attention. It only detracts from the world; it doesn't add value. Thank you for reminding us to work harder to avoid the chest-beating stupidity of "our side but not your side."
Overall I have to say the way you have consistently been able to take a wide-angle view of life is fabulous. I love your authenticity. Your videos add value and make me think. Thank you!
1 |
@TheLivingPhilosophy
1 year ago
Like supporting things? Want to support the channel? Check out the Patreon page for bonus weekly episodes and other things you'll like: patreon.com/thelivingphilosophy
13 |