Views : 73,586
Genre: Sports
Date of upload: Premiered Feb 20, 2024 ^^
Rating : 4.672 (131/1,465 LTDR)
RYD date created : 2024-04-21T00:10:04.888513Z
See in json
Top Comments of this video!! :3
7:27 boy, I sure love advertisements about ad-free stuff
Makes so much sense lol
15 |
Maybe Hulk refused to job to Brock as he could see what JR later alluded to - the booking didn’t make sense. Hogan already jobbed out to Brock so what does losing to him again accomplish that losing to him the first time didn’t?
Hogan could see that there were no long term goals in the booking.
Hence, Vince saying he’s not ready for Brock to lose only to have Brock immediately lose to Big Show.
Didn’t make sense.
This is the same reason Austin left - they wanted him to job to Brock but not part of a bigger angle. Just shortsighted booking.
58 |
FF to 3:45 for the Hogan Brock talk…
10 |
It would be one thing if Hogan was actively petitioning to get a rematch with Brock just so he could beat him and get his win back. That would be a ridiculous ego trip. But can't fault Hogan here for not wanting to lose to Brock AGAIN. Brock absolutely demolished him on Smackdown... and so then the idea was to have Brock demolish the very same guy again, but this time on Paperview?? To what end? Beating Hogan, in the fashion that he did, got Brock over... but for him to beat the same guy again in the very same fashion doesn't really get him more over. It just makes Hogan look like $hit. They had Hogan jobbing out to everyone during this period... lost to Rock twice, tapped to Angle, demolished by Brock, beat by Undertaker and he could only get the best of HHH with tons of extreme outside interference. Yep, he was in his 50s. But for one of the biggest Legends of all time who was still in great shape and was more over than anybody else in the company, he was booked really weakly. It seemed intentional. You can't have your cake and eat it too. If beating Hulk Hogan means something, then you can't have him get beat every week and have it still mean something.
5 |
At that point i agree it made no sense for Hogan to beat Lesnar being undefeated. Hogan was over regardless. But Lesnar was young, huge and looked unstoppable so having a 50 plus year old guy beating him would've been unbelievable. At least with Big Show he was a guy that was huge and looked the part to defeat Lesnar. With Heyman turning i felt like story wise it made way more sense than Hulkster squashing his push by beating him cleanly in the middle of the ring.
28 |
That's false -- Meltzer b.s. Hulk was more than happy to do the honors for Brock. His problem was he had been beat to death leading in to Brock beating him the first time - Rock at Mania, Taker at Judgement Day, Kurt at King of the Ring, and then the angle on Smack Down where Brock beat him & took him out. So to come back and go straight in to another match with Brock/ another loss would make it look like Brock beat nobody. He's Hogan yeah, but he's still a full time fixture on the show as well, so i'm kinda with him on that he needed to be built back up before getting beat again and the comeback win on Brock would've been at least a start to that.
26 |
@AnEternalEnigma
2 months ago
3:44 for the actual Hogan talk to start
204 |