@ZennExile

9 months ago

Hey Dr Ben, does that estimate consider the gigatons of life that was permeating the billions of hectares of land about a meter deep, storing surface water for long periods of time, and that was subsequently dug up and gassed off to make way for Industrial Agriculture? Far be it for bottom dwelling internet scum to question the conclusions of a man who put himself through the PhD process with somebody's hard earned money, but I didn't catch any mention of the gigatons of water that used to be trapped in the Rhizosphere with the gigatons of living biomass, or the other gigatons of decaying biomass below the living biomass. Seems there was a fair measure of water being stored in the top meter of global soils until we wove the war engine into Industrializing Agriculture after WW2. I mean, what were we gonna do lose money on all that prefab hardware? Why when we could strap farmers to the last penny with debt and slowly price normal people out of all that farmland? Then consolidating global food production down to a handful of far more easily controlled individuals opens diplomatic doors adjacent to vast stores of natural resources ravaged, conveniently by humanitarian crisis, not the least of which is famine. But I digress... Just wondering where the data on the Rhizosphere makes its way into our general understanding of things like the carbon cycle and human influence on the environment in general. If I weren't just a filthy internet hobo yelling at a dumpster, I could say such a massive piece of the puzzle being missing is strange at the very least. Insidious in the minds of those less gifted with socioeconomic influence. I guess what I am trying to say is. Do you think the Rhizosphere being ripped up gassed off and poisoned near to global extinction over billions of hectare had any measurable effect on pole shift acceleration? And what if any amount of water displacement was accounted for in this measurable or insignificant effect? Asking for trillions of tiny murdered friends that can't seem to get any mention in any of these scientific journals... have you ever noticed just how damn many of these papers seem to spawn from the meta data from every site you can pay to get published on? Digging through the muck to find and rinse clean the gems is tedious at best. I'm starting to see why no one in the media actually does this. It's almost like special interest groups have been funneling money into research programs with a scatter gun. Seems as long as they all keep repeating the same talking points, they keep getting paid to publish papers. Weird coincidence. But probably just me and the dumpster being paranoid.

14 |