@LeCort-yc8pr

11 months ago

IMPORTANT QUESTION, sort of. Ok it has nothing to do with the topic of this video but i though of something about your video on quantum comunicarion with quantum entanglement and heres what I commented in that video. I'm just really curious in if it could be a solution or not (probably not, but still wanna know). So here's what i wrote on that video: (also, I'm really sorry for my terrible English, my apologies)

In the last scenario, the one in which 0 is left/right (x axis) and 1 is up/down (y axis) [for example]. If we say thay Bob makes a mesure in the y axis and observes a "down" state, then if Alice mesures the spin then she should * always * mesure the opposite state ("up") but have a 50/50 probability of mesuring a "left" or "right" spin. Using this premise we can do so Bob makes one mesure in the y axis (up) and have Alice make not one but * multiple * mesures in both axis, in this case if she mesures idk 100 times the spin in the Y axis then she should * always * get a "down" mesurement, but if she observes the spin 100 in the X axis she will have random results of "left" and "right" (~50 left, ~50 right). In this case, because Alice can conclude that the axis Bob made the mesurement is in the Y axis, as it's the only one which didn't have random results. Would that work??

3 |