23:36
SciPEP2023 | 1: Communicating Basic Science - Champion, Catalyze, Connect
01:01:04
SciPEP2023 | 4: Relevance or Connection?
01:04:01
SciPEP2023 | 9: A SciComm Research Agenda - What do we include?
01:40:03
SciPEP2023 | 3: Identity and Inspiration - What do we know about "basic" scientists?
33:42
SciPEP2023 | 10 : Opportunities and Priorities
58:19
SciPEP2023 | 8: SciComm Training - What do we need?
08:18
SciPEP2023 | 6: Communicating the Future: What’s next for Engaging the Public in Basic Science
05:42
SciPEP2023 | 5: Reflections and Promise
59:34
SciPEP2023 | 2: Perceptions and Preferences - What does the public want?
17:13
SciPEP2023 | 11: Closing Thoughts and Gratitude
39:13
SciPEP2023 | 7: Charting a Pathway from Insights to Action
47:19
Communicating the Future: An Agenda for Engaging the Public with Basic Science
28:06
Understanding Public Engagement with Basic Research: A Research Agenda, with Sara Yeo
25:13
Toward an Integrated Framework for Engaging the Public in Basic Science, with Rick Borchelt
25:24
Is Basic Science Engagement Unique? with Brooke Smith
05:14
Aquí Nos Cuidamos: A model for inclusive community-centered science engagement
44:55
Session 1C | What does two-way communication look like for basic science?
44:05
Session 3E | How do we know if we are making a difference?
44:59
Session 3D | How are justice and equity taken into consideration for public engagement training?
45:31
Session 3C | What is the impact of public deference to scientific authority?
46:02
Session 3B | What are the effects of societal controversy on the communication of basic science?
45:38
Session 3A | Curiosity, wonder, and awe in science engagement: a deeper dive
44:52
Session 2D | How can public relations contribute to public engagement with basic science?
45:19
Session 2C | Why do scientists engage the public in basic science?
44:48
Session 2B | Meet people where they are, or invite them over?
45:17
Session 2A | Why do federal agencies communicate about basic research?
44:54
Session 1D | What did we learn about needs in public engagement by organizing this conference?
46:02
Session 1B | Do we need to anchor communication about basic research to its future applications?
45:21
Session 1A | How does the broader public view basic science?
29:01
Plenary 9 | SciPEP: a look to the future of public engagement on basic science
20:51
Plenary 8 | Making science fun(ny) with Science! The Show
29:25
Plenary 7 | How do we move forward from here?
50:55
Plenary 6 | From ribosomes to revolution with Jennifer Doudna
51:40
Plenary 5 | How can we ensure public engagement in basic science is equitable and inclusive?
01:00:07
Plenary 4 | What sparks curiosity, wonder, and awe?
50:42
Plenary 3 | Exploring the relationship between basic science and the public
49:59
Plenary 2 | What is public engagement in science?
24:00
Plenary 1 | Communicating basic science: engaging scientists, engaging the public
03:35
Engaging the public with science through art collaborations
04:48
Science Communication in the Trenches: 5G and Covid-19
04:03
Science Clubs International: An international hands-on STEM education program
03:43
Basic Science vs. Policy: Multi-Engagement Approaches at Long-Term Ecological Research Sites
04:41
Developing specialised training to support high quality, inclusive researcher-led public engagement
04:40
Communicating CRISPR and Sickle Cell Disease Through Immersive Virtual Reality
03:38
COVID-19 Prequel Stories: How basic science research helped combat the pandemic
05:56
Animating science: A behind-the-scenes look at creating animations for research communication
06:01
Accelerating Public Engagement in Fundamental Science through CERN Social Media
03:40
Immersive outreach: accessibility of physical locations and pilot of online interactive experiences
03:44
Up close with science: conveying the excitement of basic research during the COVID19 pandemic
03:59
Promoting Community Science Literacy: The Power of Public Storytelling
05:26
When educated whites don’t see a problem: Divides in public opinion on AI-based policing
05:23
Applied Science Communication: Best Practices for Public Engagement with Basic Science
03:59
Community Collaboration: Joining schools and church groups together in a bid to showcase science
04:37
ESA’s Strategic Communication – A Case for Evidence-Based Institutional Communication
02:22
Familiar first: An argument for engaging the public with applied science before basic science
05:06
Three projects to produce public engagement tools to increase trust in covid-19 vaccines
03:59
Diverse, Inclusive Public Outreach through the Global Community of Amateur Astronomers
04:49
"Your Weekly Dose of Whoa!" - A Science Series Targeting Television News Viewers in Louisiana
04:16
Science communication at the forefront of genomics and society
06:07
Independent science cafes run by community members bring science to a wider cross-section of society
X
About
The Department of Energy’s Office of Science and The Kavli Foundation share a common interest in ensuring that basic science engagement is supported, sustainable, and effective. SciPEP (Science Public Engagement Partnership) was built on that common interest and endeavored to ensure scientists have support to be effective communicators and, if appropriate, active in engaging the public. SciPEP also sought to recognize and empower communication and engagement professionals to play an important role in supporting engagement efforts. Lastly, SciPEP led efforts to understand how, why, and when publics-at-large seek, find, and make use of information about basic research.
Tags