Channel Avatar

The Paint Explainer @UCnwUjPK7dXety-AJ4fNw_RQ@youtube.com

1.4M subscribers - no pronouns :c

I explain interesting stuff using paint. āš ļø Heads-up: the i


Welcoem to posts!!

in the future - u will be able to do some more stuff here,,,!! like pat catgirl- i mean um yeah... for now u can only see others's posts :c

The Paint Explainer
Posted 4 months ago

Hey everyone! Just wanted to give you an update on the whole DOGE situation from my last video. I’ve been checking out the comments and noticed a mix of opinions, so I want to explain what my goal was and see if I managed to do it.

I basically wanted to look into the most particular/interesting things that DOGE mentioned on its X profile, do a bit more digging, and add some factual background or extra context that might be helpful for you to make your own judgement.

I wasn’t trying to share my own personal opinions, so I wasn’t siding with or against DOGE. In parts of the video (like around 6:35), I mention possible errors in DOGE’s numbers—like with the Alpaca Farming in Peru project—but that’s only when I found something that didn’t match up with the facts according to the provided sources.

I knew there might be some backlash since topics like this can get pretty heated. Normally, I try to make it super clear that I’m staying as objective as possible. Maybe I didn’t communicate that well enough this time, or maybe this particular topic is just too sensitive right now. Or maybe I failed in my intent altogether.

I’ve also seen some comments pointing out that I used X as a source. To clarify, I included DOGE’s X posts in my sources so you can see exactly where they claimed these expenses were made. Those claims (apart from the ā€œ$56,000 to water 8 plantsā€ one, which is why I said ā€œDOGE CLAIMEDā€) do have other sources like usaspending.gov.

I think the main point of confusion might've been the title, but I want to clarify that I’m not the one calling these expenditures ā€œwaste.ā€ That label comes from DOGE's tweets, I just used it as a starting point to dig deeper and let you make up your own minds on if these expenditures were really waste or not. I can't think of a way of talking about this topic with a "neutral-sounding" title (e.g. The Craziest Spending DOGE Found would still sound like I'm siding with DOGE because of the word "Craziest", or The Funniest Spending DOGE Found would make it sound like I'm siding against it).

I also referred to some of DOGE’s X claims with the same titles they used, like the ā€œThanos gauntletā€ experiment, because that’s what DOGE presented them as and how they're now known as, and I explained what those experiments actually involved. If I said "$118,000 for an experiment about snapping mandibles," those who read the original DOGE's tweet would have had no idea what I was talking about.

A few people have suggested that by making a video on this topic, I’m automatically siding with DOGE. I really don’t think that’s the case. In my opinion, giving out as objective info as possible on subjects that often get bogged down by misinformation and polarization is crucial, so people can decide for themselves.

This video took a lot of research, and I’m totally open to specific feedback (like with timestamps) if you think there’s a moment I might’ve slipped in some bias or personal opinion. I still feel like the video is objective overall, but maybe my timing and wording made it come off differently. Let me know what you guys think!

934 - 183

The Paint Explainer
Posted 5 months ago

Today, we reached 1M subscribers. I could have NEVER imagined this just a year ago. You've truly changed my life. I want to thank every single one of you for watching and supporting my content. I’ll keep trying my best to bring you even more interesting videos.
Once again, thank you so much!
I want to do a FAQ video; drop any questions you have under here!

2.9K - 278

The Paint Explainer
Posted 6 months ago

Hey everyone, just wanted to give a quick update on why the new video is no longer online.
I originally thought that splitting the ad integration into multiple smaller parts rather than one long segment would've been less disruptive. However, I've read multiple comments saying otherwise, so I've learned the lesson and won't make the same mistake again. I'll upload the fixed version ASAP (sorry)

1.5K - 108

The Paint Explainer
Posted 10 months ago

What other topics/ideas would you like to see with the "pyramid" format? I'll make the most liked ones!

738 - 116

The Paint Explainer
Posted 1 year ago

What video would you like to see?
I'll make the most liked comments!

683 - 273

The Paint Explainer
Posted 1 year ago

Do not accept friend requests or DMs from individuals named like me on Discord; they are scammers.
My only real Discord account is the admin of the server that you can find in my YouTube's "About" section or in the description of my videos.

1.1K - 57

The Paint Explainer
Posted 1 year ago

Happy Christmas, everyone!

Also, we just hit 100k! I would've never guessed we would've grown so fast. Thank you so much!

Let me know what topics you'd like me to cover in future videos, either here or in my Discord: discord.gg/yj7KAs33hw

Love you all ā¤ļø

1.8K - 106