It'll explode or go off when it's not supposed to, Sig will take a year to perfect it, Sig won't tell people what they changed, and people will still pay $3000 for one.
Aero Precision is making a lever gun, Stag Arms is making a lever gun, Smith and Wesson is making a lever gun, Bond Arms is making a lever gun, POF made one, but it doesn't work that well. I'm liking the idea of having all these options.
I'd love to see some modern top-break revolvers, but I assume manufacturers believe there isn't enough of a market for it.
Quick behind the scenes info: I have no control over what kinds of advertisements that YouTube plays. There are a few options about when the ads play, but I don't touch them. I just let YouTube do whatever it wants and they give me about $100 a month. So if you see some weird Tik Tok ad, that wasn't me.
My thoughts are the gun is unsafe and I made a video about it.
https://youtu.be/Itiz0Pnismk?si=-qMfq...
If you have over one million subscribers, and the content is flowing, and the YouTube ad revenue is coming in, then you could expect to take it over $50,000 per month. Just YouTube. No sponsors, no Patreon, no other sources.
So I have to ask how much is enough?
He replied to my comment!
All I'm going to say is that my Sig P250 never had any of these accusations, you know, the three separate ones.
New Jersey mentioned, swells with disdain.
An eclectic mix of different kinds of videos that will hopefully include firearms, video games, movies, and whatever else I or my viewers seem to like.