in the future - u will be able to do some more stuff here,,,!! like pat catgirl- i mean um yeah... for now u can only see others's posts :c
Some good comments I’d like to highlight. The middle one specifically, is a necessary reminder for us to ensure that we are taking advantage of our ability to express freely. For a second, imagine if you were born in any Islamic country under Shariah, you can forget about expressing these views.
We shouldn’t take this for granted, and we must use our rights to voice for all who are unable to share their views. It is crucial for maintaining these rights. We must become a majority to avoid the oppression which is so easily forced into minority groups, especially of this caliber.
63 - 37
Religious extremism remains a pressing issue in modern society.
Hamas, an Islamic extremist group controlling Palestinian territory, Gaza, has now invaded Israel, abducted hundreds of innocent men, women and children (I’ve seen women and toddlers dragged around like rag-dolls), murdered hundreds more, dragged people through the streets and desert while launching an “ungodly” amount of munitions into the Israeli territory, all while chanting “Allahu Akbar” as if the reason they are able to perform this is because their god, is so, so good.
Give me a F_CK_NG break. Peaceful religion My Ace. You can claim peace the moment this god strikes down all of these cowardice extremists.
Examine how the religious belief can be manipulated to justify extreme actions.
Hamas draws this deplorable inspiration from Islam. Without Islam, Hamas wouldn’t be.
While it's important not to stereotype all religious based on the actions of their extremists, it's equally or more important to acknowledge that religious extremism can only exist as long as these humans are convinced they are here as a result of their tribe’s divine creator.
You cannot argue this is not in part, motivated by religion. Every single, brain-dead garbage typed defending Palestinian actions is blabbing about the sins of the Israeli. The idiotic things these ancient brained primates come up with is laughably insane. I cannot wait to see mainstream Muslims defending this cancerous disease of thought they preach as Islam.
Try instilling “peace within you” before stating “peace be with you.”
As atheists, we value life. We value reason. We value LOGIC. And there is no logical reason that we should be ending someone’s life in the name of Allah, or any other made up slop from a pork’s arse they call god.
7 - 3
Just wanted to share some big things I’m working on. Been spending a lot of time learning Adobe Suite and Blender. Can’t wait to share what I have learned and am making.
Also, Blender is hard. I hope you get a good laugh at what was my second attempt of a model.
0 - 0
Do you think the United States Constitution’s First Amendment is clear in stating rights for atheists?
In the first sentence is says, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,”
Does this mean free not to exercise?
5 - 8
I wrote a short essay on how the First Amendment rights enable citizens to influence the laws of our country or initiate a constitutional amendment and, in so doing, prevent the dissolution of the Republic in the ways that have affected other nations in the past.
I'm open to any criticism and feedback.
If you're interested, I am posting the story here, only about 800 words, or if you'd like a pdf you can email me at: antithesis.of.faith@gmail.com and I will share it with you.
Essay starts here:
Preserving the Republic: The Power of 'We the People
On May 29, 2010, Viktor Orbán was democratically elected as Hungary’s prime minister.
This marked a pivotal moment in the nation's history, triggering a series of constitutional changes
legitimized by Christian nationalism that had far-reaching consequences for democratic principles.
These changes, implemented without meaningful cross-party consultation, had a profound impact
on the country's political landscape. Orchestrated by Orbán's party, the reforms weakened the
traditional system of checks and balances, centralizing power in the executive branch and upsetting
the delicate equilibrium between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of the Hungarian
government.
One of the most significant outcomes of these changes was the transformation of the media
landscape, with Orbán's government enacting new laws that curtailed press freedom and
undermined independent journalism. Moreover, the erosion of civil liberties, particularly with regards
to minority rights and LGBTQ+ individuals, raised concerns about human rights violations and
signaled a departure from the principles of inclusivity and tolerance that underpin democratic
societies. This specific case exemplifies challenges to certain foundational aspects of democracy,
specifically education and media literacy, both of which proved inadequate in preventing the ascent
of a dictator through democratic means.
While democracy is widely regarded as the most favorable form of governance, it is not
without its challenges. At its core, democracy entrusts decision-making authority to the citizenry,
granting them the power to shape their government and its policies. However, this authority also
carries the inherent risk of individuals, voluntarily or inadvertently, relinquishing their own rights or
allowing the majority to strip minority groups of their rights. These challenges underscore the crucial
role of ongoing cultural discourse within American society, as it serves as a means to foster social
unity and safeguard individual liberties. This discourse acts as a safeguard, ensuring that
democratic principles are upheld and that the voices of all citizens are heard and respected.
The First Amendment of the United States Constitution plays a pivotal role in preserving
democracy and preventing the erosion of democratic values. By enshrining the right to assemble,
petition, and speak freely, it empowers citizens to actively participate in the political process. This
empowerment enables individuals to influence the formulation of laws, acts as a barrier against the
cessation of the republic, and ensures that government actions are subjected to scrutiny. The First
Amendment's principles align with the concept of "trias politica," which underscores the importance
of maintaining a system of checks and balances to preserve the stability and integrity of American
democracy. Furthermore, the First Amendment provides citizens with the means to influence constitutional amendments through Article V, which outlines the process for amending the
Constitution, facilitating engagement with representatives and mobilizing grassroots efforts to drive
change.
Karl Popper, an Austrian-British philosopher renowned for his philosophy of science, also
contributed valuable insights to the realm of democracy. His paradox of tolerance is particularly
relevant, highlighting the necessity of safeguarding democratic principles and trust in democratic
institutions. The paradox posits that if absolute tolerance is extended to all ideas, it can
inadvertently allow intolerant ideas to flourish unchecked. Those who embrace tolerance may
unwittingly accept this intolerance, while those holding intolerant views may refuse to tolerate those
advocating tolerance. This underscores the need for society to establish boundaries on what it
tolerates. In this context, the United States imposes limitations on the First Amendment to prohibit
certain forms of speech, such as obscenity, defamation, incitement, and more, as these are
deemed intolerant of the values that uphold a cohesive society.
The case of Viktor Orbán's Hungary serves as one of many poignant reminders of the
fragility of democracy when unchecked power is allowed to subvert its core principles. Orbán's
consolidation of power, erosion of civil liberties, and disregard for democratic norms exemplify how
easily a democratic system can be manipulated for autocratic ends. However, as we contemplate
the challenges faced by democracy, we must also recognize the resilience and wisdom inherent in
democratic institutions, with the First Amendment in the United States standing as a prime
example. This essential safeguard protects the right to assemble, petition, and speak freely,
empowering citizens to influence their government and prevent the erosion of democratic values.
Ultimately, the lessons drawn from Hungary and the insights of philosophers like Karl
Popper underscore the imperative of constant vigilance and active participation in the democratic
process.
It falls upon each citizen to uphold and defend the principles of democracy, ensuring that the
freedoms enshrined in the First Amendment remain unassailable. Failure to do so could lead down
a perilous path, where the erosion of democratic values mirrors the troubling developments in
Hungary and other cautionary examples throughout history. As we navigate the complexities of our
democratic societies, we must remember that the preservation of our democratic ideals lies in our
hands, and history will ultimately judge us by our commitment to safeguarding them.
-GoL
3 - 8
Liberal philosophy was an ideology of social change and progress,
with the goal being the perfectibility of humankind through the empirical study of natural laws.
Which philosopher contributed more, in your opinion? Why?
If you aren't familiar with one or more, I would highly recommend doing a little research to get an understanding of their impacts.
Learn more here: scholarcommons.sc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=…
2 - 2
The mission is clear: to provide a platform where rationality triumphs over faith, where questioning is encouraged, and where the pursuit of truth is relentless. Whether you're a seasoned atheist, an agnostic exploring your beliefs or someone encountering atheism for the first time, you'll find a wealth of enriching content here.
Prepare for critical inquiry and contemplation. This channel is a dedicated space for those who seek to explore the world through the lens of rational thought, unshackled from the constraints of religious dogma.
This channel boldly challenges faith-based beliefs, superstitions and unfounded claims, fostering a community where skepticism is cherished, and evidence-based perspectives are prized.
I engage in thought-provoking discussions that delve into the depths of atheism, shedding light on the intricacies of non-belief, secularism, and the rejection of religious doctrine.
Become an integral part of our ever-expanding community of atheists and freethinkers.