Jimmy Kimmel was suspended for comments he made regarding Charlie Kirk's passing. Even after his return, some affiliates still choose not to air the episode. Was the suspension justified, or did they go too far?
165 - 199
Should comments that incite violence—like those made by Hasan Piker or Destiny—be considered free speech, or do they cross the line and deserve legal action?
134 - 200
Charlie wasn’t just a political figure—he was a father, a husband, and a mentor to thousands. Many of us looked to him not because he agreed with us, but because he moved us—urging a generation to believe their voice mattered.
He stood firm when it was easier to stay silent. He embodied conviction, courage, and a belief that change happens when young people refuse to sit on the sidelines. That’s a legacy worth carrying forward.
To his wife Erika and those beautiful kids he left behind: I wish words could comfort you right now. May you be surrounded by love, and may you find strength in the truth that Charlie gave everything for the future he believed in.
For those of us still left behind—friends, allies, critics—let’s honor him by preserving his spirit: we debate, we disagree, but we never retreat from truth, family, or freedom.
Rest in power, Charlie. Your fight isn’t over.
1.7K - 74
If someone wants a family, when’s the best time to start: while you’re young and full of energy, or later with more stability?
30 - 30
"Look, it's a good thing to be loyal to your friends; it's a cornerstone of friendship. What is not good is not to be impartial and fair when you have the biggest podcast and platform in the world, which Joe Rogan has. Many people criticize Rogan for his choice of guests, which can sometimes mislead listeners with questionable information or outright nonsensical statements. Those are fair contentions. And when statements like Bustamante's are made public, it gives some credit to those criticisms. But the bottom line is that we don't actually know how Joe chooses his guests, and given that it is his podcast, he has the right to choose whoever he wants. I suppose we, as observers, simply wish for greater transparency."
https://youtu.be/YvhN4g3kX_Q
18 - 8
Is the new Hollywood Jesus Christ Superstar play disrespectful to Christians?
27 - 19
People will say this about the new woke Jesus Christ Superstar: “Oh, it’s satire, Christians shouldn’t care.” But satire of faith isn’t neutral. If a play consistently reframes sacred events to mock or distort them, it is an attack, even if dressed up as art. Then they will say the audience is adults, not kids, so who cares? But culture isn’t compartmentalized; the ideas still shape how people see the faith. Historically, media portrayals have a massive influence; think of how “The Da Vinci Code” planted the idea in millions of people’s minds that Jesus and Mary Magdalene were romantically involved. Fiction shapes public theology far more than we’d like to admit. Brushing it off with “it’s just satire” is like saying propaganda doesn’t matter because it’s printed on nice paper."
https://youtu.be/JmneBvmuLGA
36 - 13
"Things like the Soviet gulags, Mao’s China, and slavery have been widely accepted for thousands of years. Each time, the “collective” supported something that we now recognize as evil. This shows that morality can’t simply be decided by popularity. Maybe we should believe in a fixed moral law, something higher than culture, opinion, or even the state. This doesn’t mean a theocracy; it means that our laws should reflect unchanging moral truths, not just trends. In practical terms, it’s why some people fight for things like protecting unborn life even if polls say otherwise, because right and wrong aren’t determined by a vote.
If the collective gets to decide what’s right and wrong, history tells us they’ll get it wrong, badly, and often. That’s how you get slavery, genocide, and mass injustice, all stamped with the approval of the majority.
Here’s the bottom line: America’s strength has always come from recognizing that people's rights come from God, not government. That’s not a “church takeover”, it’s the only safeguard people have against tyranny by the majority. If we lose that, morality becomes a moving target, and the people in power get to move it wherever they want."
https://youtu.be/xECAgqHzUZQ
266 - 55
“Getting rid of DEI is a step forward, but we all know that it was not completely removed; it just changed names.
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion programs sound nice, but in practice, they’ve often turned into race-based hiring quotas, mandatory bias trainings, and speech policing. And that is still present.
When it comes to border security, yes, there has been a lot of development, even with the pushback from both the media and some states, but still, that is a point in favor of the administration.
And then we have the Epstein files debacle. That case has been so poorly handled to the point of it seeming like collusion from the administration itself. It's not looking good at all. That case isn’t about gossip—it’s about accountability for some of the world’s most powerful people. The secrecy around it fuels distrust in government, which we should see as a major problem.
And now some people are losing hope. Why? Because it feels like the people really running things are hidden from view. This is something a lot of people feel, too. We talk about “the swamp” or “the deep state” not as a conspiracy theory, but as shorthand for the unelected bureaucrats, lobbyists, and corporate elites who influence policy behind closed doors.”
https://youtu.be/LYWnxGMpw_s
50 - 3
Which of President Trump's major proposals are you more worried about?
28 - 22
AV Mind Channel
Looking to learn and share knowledge from the greatest minds of our time.
I do commentary and informative analyses of debated and relevant subjects.
Asking the uncomfortable questions in a quest for a higher truth.
Thank you to all Subscribers.
- ALTIOR VERITAS -