Welcoem to posts!!
in the future - u will be able to do some more stuff here,,,!! like pat catgirl- i mean um yeah... for now u can only see others's posts :c
@The-Final-Experiment just got scammed by an unscrupulous person. As a result, the Golden Ticket appears to be a fake offer. Globe Earthers, please consider a donation to help rectify the wrong. Flat Earthers, please consider a donation to show you reject this type of behavior.
https://gofund.me/a4625db3
0 - 0
@FlatzoidsPerspective either can't or won't solve all the sides of his triangles in his community post.
He asked to be shown where he was wrong. The Geogebra image shows how he is wrong.
I created triangles with the same baseline lengths that Flatzoid provided. I ensured that the left side matched the same angle (23 degrees) which gave a height of 1706.37 NM.
Using his provided baseline for the right side of 3480 NM, the angle with a height of 1706.37 is 26.12 degrees, not 32. To get a 32 degree angle along a flat baseline with a height of 1706.37 NM, the baseline must be 2730.3 NM.
To get an angle of 32 degrees with a baseline of 3480, the height of the triangle must increase to 2174.22 NM, but this skews our left side triangle to have an angle of 28.41 degrees.
If Flatzoid disagrees, then he should solve for all sides of his triangles and show where and how analysis this is wrong.
Link to the Geogebra
www.geogebra.org/m/vkc5f83y
0 - 0
Celebrating the advancements and achievements in Flat Earth research and scientific analysis.