The Longhouse, the Panopticon, and the Global Village.
This is the architecture of the liberal state's systematic war on white boys.
Our institutions are egalitarian, punishing the masculine inclination toward competition and hierarchy.
Our culture sells erotic content as a surrogate for relationships and the responsibilities they entail.
Our governments accumulate censorship and surveillance powers, acting as intermediaries between oppressive majorities and protected minorities.
Until these institutions are recaptured and reformed, we will raise generations of deracinated, chestless men.
open.substack.com/pub/connortomlinson/p/the-longhoâŚ
707 - 71
If you wonder how people can support insane policies that endanger them and their family, remember Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn met multiple inmates in Soviet Gulags who rationalised their false imprisonment to retain their faith in the Communist Party.
Some were informants against their spouses.
Do not underestimate human beings' capacity for self-delusion.
Read more on Substack:
open.substack.com/pub/connortomlinson/p/america-muâŚ
1.4K - 123
A new iron curtain of censorship now encircles the UK and Europe, imposed by politicians purporting to defend democracy. America can help lift it.
Censorship and immigration have a symbiotic relationship: concerns about immigration are suppressed before and while it happens, and criticisms of multiculturalism and crimes committed by immigrants criminalised as âincitement to racial hatredâ after the fact.
Britain will not solve its immigration crisis without the ability to speak about it; and it will not have the freedom to do so unless the yoke of censorship is lifted with assistance from our American allies.
In 1946, Winston Churchill warned that an âiron curtainâ had descended over Europe, separating the Eastern Bloc from Western Christendom. Said curtain was woven by Franklin D. Roosevelt and Joseph Stalin, who excluded Churchill from meetings in Tehran and Yalta to divide Europe up amongst themselves.
The Berlin Wall was built in 1961, and stood until President Reagan, defying State Department and National Security Council advisors, told President Gorbachev to tear it down. Citizens on both sides demolished it by hand two years later, in 1989.
Without opposition from Reagan and Churchill, the Evil Empire would have continued to sweep Europe, claiming millions more lives in wars, famines, and Gulags before inevitably exhausting itself through Marxist economics.
In the same speech, Churchill coined the phrase âthe special relationshipâ to describe diplomatic ties, based on shared history and heritage, between the United States and Great Britain.
It should alarm our American friends, then, that British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has lied to President Trumpâs face on more than one occasion.
When Vice President Vance mentioned âinfringements on free speech that actually affect not just the British ⌠but also affect American technology companies and, by extension, American citizensâ during their Oval Office meeting, Starmer said âWe've had free speech for a very long time, and it will last a long time, and we are very proud of that.â
He repeated this lie when President Trump visited Turnberry, Scotland last month, telling GB Newsâ Bev Turner, "We're not censoring anyone.â
Starmer's answer came days after implementing the Online Safety Act (2023), which he and his party voted for.
Atop the existing Public Order Act (1986), Malicious Communications Act (1988), Communications Act (2003), and Public Order Act (2023), police have a plethora of statutes to cite when arresting people for âoffensiveâ speech. 30 such arrests are made every day â over 12,000 a year.
In 2023, Starmer also promised to restore penalties for platforms hosting âlegal but harmfulâ content, removed from the final version of the Act, if elected to government.
In summer 2024, the National Security and Online Information Team (the NSOIT, known as the âCounter Disinformation Unitâ during the COVID pandemic) contacted TikTok to request the Trust and Safety team remove content referring to illegal migrants as âundocumented fighting-age malesâ.
NSOIT is now spending ÂŁ2.3 million in taxpayer funds to create a âcounter disinformation data platformâ, using tools developed to identify ISIS fighters in recruitment videos, and monitor âconcerningâ narratives about immigration and two-tier policing online. The Home Office has also assigned a new policing unit to monitor âanti-migrant postsâ on social media.
During the Vice Presidentâs visit, the State Department published a damning report, stating âThe human rights situation worsened in the United Kingdom during the year [2024 - 2025].â It identified âcredible reports of serious restrictions on freedom of expression, including enforcement of or threat of criminal or civil laws in order to limit expressionâ.
As a denizen of an increasingly dystopic Britain, I encourage the US to leverage this special relationship and lift this digital Iron Curtain.
Britain will welcome you as liberators.
My latest essay for Courage Media, with an audio track available for Substack subscribers:
courage.media/2025/08/22/america-must-lift-britainâŚ
open.substack.com/pub/connortomlinson/p/america-muâŚ
3.3K - 504
The difference between how Ricky Jones and Lucy Connolly or Peter Lynch were treated is proof of a two-tier justice system in Britain.
Jones' presiding Judge Rosa Dean sits on a voluntary Diversity and Community Relations Judges committee.
How did she instruct the jury?
How can we trust that she wasn't biased in favour of the Labour Councillor in her courtroom, and the Socialist Workers' Party protesters who cheered for Jones' call to cut counter-protestors' throats?
How can we trust the jury was not contaminated by ideology, after previous racially and politically-charged rulings?
Jones was given bail, and represented by Garden Court Chambers â the number one ranked barristersâ chambers in the country.
Connolly was denied bail, and advised to plead guilty by her appointed defence solicitor. She has since been denied Right of Temporary Leave by the prison governor, as a punishment for telling her story to Allison Pearson.
Jones made an imminent call for violence against an identifiable target, in the middle of a crowd.
Connolly made a vague tweet about her indifference to violence being committed, before deleting it.
The difference between Jones and Connolly or any of the Southport protesters is that the state endorses Jones' ideology, and so refuses to punish his call for violence made in a fit of passion.
Whereas Connolly was given no lenience because she committed the unforgivable sin of noticing differences between ethnic and cultural groups, which the state thinks is far worse than any insinuation of violence.
Jones was rewarded by the system, because it endorses what he said: to open borders and kill "fascists" (their political opponents).
https://youtu.be/dn6N2sRoDKk
watch video on watch page
196 - 13
âIn the words of the poet Rudyard Kipling, thereâs only so far you can push an Anglo-Saxon before he begins to learn to hate.â
I was interviewed about immigration, censorship, party politics, and civil unrest in Britain by the American Conservative.
âantiquated human rights doctrines, like the UN Refugee Convention, like the European Convention of Human Rights, which were written with Dutch Jews fleeing persecution in mind, are now pertaining to North African rapists, and weâre just battery-farming them at the taxpayers expense.â
www.theamericanconservative.com/immigration-censorâŚ
1.8K - 145
Robert Tombs is wrong: you can't learn to be English.
At the Roger Scruton Legacy Foundationâs Now & England conference, Tombs said that being English has nothing to do with ancestry.
Rather than take the audienceâs groans and heckles as a cause for reflection, Tombs doubled down in the Telegraph last week. âCan you teach people to be English (of whatever flavour) or must it be inherited?â he asks, before concluding, âI stick to my answer: we learn it.â
Tombs also insulted my Critic essay as ârather overwroughtâ. Forgive me if uncovering a millennia-old inheritance from beneath decades of liberal blank slate sediment takes longer than 800 words.
The opening lines, and indeed the title, of Tombsâ The English and Their History, identifies a âpeople who took the name âEnglish,â set up an English kingdom, and subsequently named their country England, and those who have lived there after them and thought of themselves as members of an English nationâ.
The concept of an English people predates the Norman Conquest by two centuries, and the nation being named England by a century.
The prefix âEnglishâ or âBritishâ before culture, history, or values denotes a distinct people to whom all these things belong. To say that a people is generated and defined by their products creates a paradox.
Like it or not, nations have always been collections of families: comprised of named and irreplaceable individuals, each responsible for shaping the culture, history, and heritage of their distinct people. This means identity is downstream of ancestry.
Denying this fact will just lead to importing people who will never integrate. You don't sustain a nation when you substitute one people for another.
My new essay on the history of English identity, for Courage Media:
courage.media/2025/08/13/no-you-cant-learn-to-be-eâŚ
1.6K - 223
The British state is captured by Islamic activists.
A 700-member Home Office Islamic Network holds counter-terror scheme Prevent hostage.
Propaganda department RICU gaslights the public after terror attacks, telling us "Don't Look Back in Anger."
I discussed my reporting on Muslim entryism in the civil service with @andrewgoldhereticsÂ
https://youtu.be/F1ZtILHbdOs?si=470PD...
watch video on watch page
169 - 23
âCome, let us build ourselves a city, and a tower with its top in the heavens, and let us make a name for ourselves; otherwise we shall be scattered abroad upon the face of the whole earth.â
Immigration and liberal progressivism are turning Western cities into Towers of Babel.
55% of the worldâs population live in sprawling cosmopoles.
Ancient cities were collections of tribes, who buried their ancestors in the soil, honoured them with offerings, and revered a relic from a previous settlement to keep continuity between the people and their traditions.
Modern cities deracinate intelligent young professionals from provincial towns, and their demanding work schedules and unaffordable property prices have a contraceptive effect.
The state is repopulated via airports: permeable membranes through which an international business class can pass without friction.
Millions from the third world follow these entrepreneurial Anywheres, seeking the wealth provided by work and welfare in Western states.
But neither shed their cultural prejudices when they pass through the passport gates. The city and state becomes unrecognisable within a generation.
Cities have become culturally heterogeneous, increasingly lawless, and are haemorrhaging their nationsâ native populations to the shires and suburbs.
Prophets of imminent civil unrest have also warned about inbuilt vulnerabilities in cities: being unable to feed their own population, and relying on exports of energy. Should supply chains be sabotaged, they become citadels under siege. Groups will factionalise along ethnic lines and battle for food and territory.
With so much invested in these unsustainable metropoles, the collapse of cities could destroy the West.
Get out, while you still can.
My new essay for Courage Media:
courage.media/2025/08/07/cities-will-destroy-the-wâŚ
1.1K - 91
The myth of integration must end.
The Zoomer right are pessimistic about demographics and the prospect of integration ever working.
Older establishment conservatives still speak as if we are at the start of the mass immigration experiment, rather than midway through.
Like historian Robert Tombs, who wrote in the Telegraph that English identity is learned, and has nothing to do with ethnicity or ancestry.
'We have a very clear choice', Tombs writes. 'Either we do everything possible to make them and their eventual descendants part of our nation. Or we treat them as perpetual outsiders, âethnic minoritiesâ in a tribalised England.'
We shouldn't redefine ourselves and replace our culture to accommodate strangers who hate us.
The question they never answer is, "What if immigrants don't integrate?" Because there is no next step for them
I say, assert our identity, unapologetically. Those who don't like it must leave.
https://youtu.be/RGBjYOPnYWs
watch video on watch page
385 - 35
> Net migration of a million.
> 180,000 illegals housed in taxpayer-funded hotels.
> High taxes.
> Nationwide protests.
> A state that hates us.
> 12,000 people arrested each year for speech and social media posts.
I explained to  @Timcast why Britain is on the brink of civil war.
watch video on watch page
315 - 14
Reactionary Catholic Zoomer.
Host of Tomlinson Talks, every Thursday at 19:00 PM (UK).
Senior Contributor to Courage Media.
Co-host of Deprogrammed for the New Culture Forum.