https://aeon.co/ideas/how-camus-and-sartre-split-up-over-the-question-of-how-to-be-free
Sartre, Camus and their intellectual companions rejected religion, staged new and unnerving plays, challenged readers to live authentically, and wrote about the absurdity of the world - a world without purpose and without value. ... Le Monde and L'Observateur both breathlessly covered the falling out. It's hard to imagine an intellectual

https://www.openculture.com/2022/05/jean-paul-sartre-albert-camus-their-friendship-and-the-bitter-feud-that-ended-it.html
While we've pre­vi­ous­ly brought you sto­ries of their friend­ship, and its bit­ter end, the video above digs deep­er into the Sartre-Camus rival­ry, with crit­i­cal his­tor­i­cal con­text for their think­ing.Their ini­tial falling out took place over The Rebel, which cham­pi­oned an eth­i­cal indi­vid­u­al­ism and cri­tiqued the moral­i­ty

https://www.spiegel.de/international/zeitgeist/camus-and-sartre-friendship-troubled-by-ideological-feud-a-931969.html
Camus and Sartre's falling-out in the summer of 1952, which was played out in full view of the public, was a signal, a political watershed. The rupture, in the midst of the Cold War, split the camps.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/albert-camus-and-jeanpaul-sartre-lost-letter-shows-philosophers-were-dearest-friends-before-their-bitter-fallingout-9885558.html
Albert Camus (left) and Jean-Paul Sartre fell out in 1952 and did not speak again before Camus's death ... This caused their bitter and very public falling-out. Sartre wrote in an open letter

https://www.commentary.org/articles/algis-valiunas/sartre-vs-camus/
by Algis Valiunas. The greatest French writer of the 20th century was Marcel Proust, but in their day, Jean-Paul Sartre (1905-1980) and Albert Camus (1913-1960) enjoyed an intellectual cachet that Proust in his own lifetime could only have dreamed of. Each was a novelist, a playwright, a philosopher, and a political intellectual, and in these

https://stagevoices.com/2013/11/07/the-falling-out-of-camus-and-sartre-philosophical-differences/
Albert Camus and Jean-Paul Sartre, two of the most important minds of the 20th century, were closely entwined throughout their careers. On the centenary of Camus' birth, SPIEGEL looks back at their famous friendship and the ideological feud that ultimately unraveled it. ... Camus and Sartre's falling-out in the summer of 1952, which was played

https://www.foreignaffairs.com/reviews/capsule-review/2005-01-01/camus-and-sartre-story-friendship-and-quarrel-ended-it
Camus' political involvement grew out of his concern for the lives of the Algerian poor; Sartre was drawn to politics only after spending time in a World War II prison camp, long after he had won acclaim as a philosopher and novelist. When France was liberated, the two men became the country's leading new intellectuals and heralds of

https://academic.oup.com/book/28427/chapter/228893469
It is thus ironic that when Sartre reviewed Camus's The Stranger and The Myth of Sisyphus in February 1943, his critique reads very much like a detailed report or a lesson, down to the title: 'Explanation of The Stranger'.Indeed, it is on the subject of philosophy that Sartre was his harshest with Camus. A couple of pages into the review, Sartre admonished Camus about his writing in The

https://press.uchicago.edu/Misc/Chicago/027961.html
Sartre was pleased with Camus's work in the role of Garcin, but his financial backer withdrew; this man's wife, who was to be showcased in No Exit, was arrested for suspected Resistance activity. Sartre was then offered the chance to present the play in a professional production on the Paris stage, and Camus obligingly backed out.

https://academic.oup.com/book/36022/chapter/313080988
And to exaggerate their differences even more, the French press made a scandal out of Camus' and Sartre's much‐publicized personal falling out in the 1950s. The secondary literature that followed, accordingly, was almost always "Camus versus Sartre." The two philosophers came to represent two opposite poles of the intellectual debates of

https://www.jstor.org/stable/23510951
bound to fall out and that is all that matters. But the Sartre/Camus story was in reality too open-ended and complex for such a one sided reading of the story. The events of the year before these arti cles give us a very different sense of the relationship. First was the collaboration between several people, Sartre and

https://www.thelivingphilosophy.com/camus-vs-sartre/
On Falling-out of Sartre and Camus - The Mozinity November 11, 2022 at 1:20 am - Reply ... Camus and Sartre: The story of a friendship and the quarrel that ended it. University of Chicago Press. Camus, A. and Grenier, J., 2003.

https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/p/pod/dod-idx/camus-and-sartre-on-the-absurd.pdf?c=phimp;idno=3521354.0021.032;format=pdf
As we will see by the end of the paper, Sartre considered the ab-surd a failure of a project, while Camus considered the absurd a prod-uct of lucidity. Sartre fails to grasp Camus's method of generating the feeling of the absurd because he conceptualizes the absurd diferently. I will start by reviewing and evaluating Sartre's interpretation

https://bigthink.com/thinking/camus-and-sartre/
Camus and Sartre thought of them as shackled to their labour and shorn of their humanity. In order to free them, new political systems must be constructed. In October 1951, Camus published The Rebel .

https://brill.com/abstract/book/edcoll/9789004419247/BP000013.xml
Part 1 ends with an extended consideration of Camus' longstanding friendship, then enmity, with Jean-Paul Sartre. David Sprintzen here does not however deal extensively with the famous 1952 debate between the two men in Les Temps modernes. The chapter instead introduces us to the important differences between the philosophers by reference to the complexities of Camus's 1956 novella The Fall.

https://www.amazon.com/Camus-Sartre-Story-Friendship-Quarrel/dp/0226000249
As Camus, then Sartre adopted the mantle of public spokesperson for his side, a historic showdown seemed inevitable. Sartre embraced violence as a path to change and Camus sharply opposed it, leading to a bitter and very public falling out in 1952. They never spoke again, although they continued to disagree, in code, until Camus's death in 1960.

https://sdonline.org/issue/56/talking-sartre-conversations-and-debates
Sartre discusses his falling out with Camus occasioned by Francis Jeanson's caustic review of The Rebel in Les Temps Modernes, claiming that he did not edit a word of Jeanson's text. It is disingenuous of Sartre to imply, however, that he had nothing to do with generating the review.

https://books.google.com/books/about/Camus_and_Sartre.html?id=A1UGp2rqamsC
As Camus, then Sartre adopted the mantle of public spokesperson for his side, a historic showdown seemed inevitable. Sartre embraced violence as a path to change and Camus sharply opposed it, leading to a bitter and very public falling out in 1952. They never spoke again, although they continued to disagree, in code, until Camus's death in 1960.

https://www.pdcnet.org/ipq/content/ipq_2011_0051_0004_0467_0482
This essay reads Camus's novel The Fall as a reductio ad absurdum for two major strands in Western intellectual culture, the hyper-Augustinian "we are all depraved" strand and, more decisively, what I call the "hyper-Sartrean" strand of existentialist humanism. Many commentators have identified Sartre as a target of Camus's novel, but a detailed exploration of the critique is

https://academic.oup.com/book/36022/chapter/313083208
The distinguished theater critic Eric Bentley, writing of Sartre's No Exit (Huis clos) many years ago, noted that "having assembled all the elements of a bad and deeply conventional play, Sartre has gone on to make a good play out of them." 1 Close No Exit does indeed have all of the ingredients of a cheap formulaic melodrama, and it is important to appreciate that this is exactly what

https://www.academia.edu/42260790/The_Specter_of_Narration_and_Hypocrisy_in_Albert_Camus_The_Fall
In this paper, I explored what Sartre referred to as Camus' 'most beautiful and least understood novel,' The Fall. As a methodology, I applied textual hermeneutics to immerse in the text and got out of it what I deemed as the crux of its existentialism as founded in the two-in-one leitmotif of narration and hypocrisy.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wRqMnHqWtTE
Why did Camus and Sartre fall out?Join us on an enlightening journey through the contrasting philosophies of Albert Camus and Jean-Paul Sartre, two influenti

https://existentialcomics.com/comic/58
Sartre and Camus told everyone that their falling out was over politics, but really it was mostly over Sartre evoking "radical freedom" one too many times at game night Philosophers in this comic: Jean Paul Sartre, Albert Camus, Simone de Beauvoir. Permanent Link to this Comic: https