https://www.thelivingphilosophy.com/camus-vs-sartre/
In this postwar landscape, two giants towered above all others: Jean-Paul Sartre and Albert Camus. The two men had met in Nazi-Occupied Paris in 1943 and become fast friends. Despite it being their first meeting, they were deeply acquainted with one another — each having reviewed the other's writings in their journalistic role.

https://aeon.co/ideas/how-camus-and-sartre-split-up-over-the-question-of-how-to-be-free
Camus and Sartre thought of them as shackled to their labour and shorn of their humanity. In order to free them, new political systems must be constructed. In October 1951, Camus published The Rebel. In it, he gave voice to a roughly drawn 'philosophy of revolt'.

https://thelivingphilosophy.substack.com/p/camus-vs-sartre
Camus, on the other hand, was often compared to the Hollywood star of Casablanca Humphrey Bogart; he was handsome slim and above-average height.. Just as their appearances were at odds with each other, so too were their backgrounds. Sartre came from an upper-middle-class family and was educated in France's elite university — the Sorbonne — while Camus was one of the Pieds-Noirs — a

https://www.commentary.org/articles/algis-valiunas/sartre-vs-camus/
by Algis Valiunas. The greatest French writer of the 20th century was Marcel Proust, but in their day, Jean-Paul Sartre (1905-1980) and Albert Camus (1913-1960) enjoyed an intellectual cachet that Proust in his own lifetime could only have dreamed of. Each was a novelist, a playwright, a philosopher, and a political intellectual, and in these

https://blogs.ubc.ca/phil489/files/2018/03/5_Camus-and-Sartre.pdf
political and philosophical differences now separating Camus and Sartre was fur-ther highlighted by the publication of The Plaguein mid-1947, a novel that seemed to confirm the suspicion of Sartre and de Beauvoir that Camus had "rejected his-tory": "to treat the Occupation as the equivalent of a natural calamity was", accord-

https://academic.oup.com/book/36022/chapter/313080988
Albert Camus and Jean‐Paul Sartre, their famous differences aside, shared a "phenomenological" sensibility. They were both philosophers who described personal experience in exquisite and excruciating detail and reflected on the meaning of this experience with sensitivity and insight.

https://press.uchicago.edu/Misc/Chicago/027961.html
An excerpt from Camus and Sartre: The Story of a Friendship and the Quarrel that Ended It by Ronald Aronson. Also available on web site: online catalogs, secure online ordering, excerpts from new books. ... In addition to their mutual praise and sense of discovery, these texts suggest many differences between Sartre and Camus. Sartre had a more

https://stagevoices.com/2013/11/07/the-falling-out-of-camus-and-sartre-philosophical-differences/
Camus and Sartre basically stood in each other's way right from the beginning. They were both storytellers, playwrights and essayists, literature and theater critics, philosophers and editors in chief. They had the same publisher. They both were awarded the Nobel Prize for literature. Camus felt overwhelming gratitude when he accepted his award

https://academic.oup.com/book/28427/chapter/228893469
When Camus's The Stranger and The Myth of Sisyphus were published in 1942, Jean-Paul Sartre was already an established author. But Camus and Sartre had not yet met. Part of Sartre's claim to fame arose from the 1938 publication of his first novel, Nausea, in which a teacher in a provincial city experiences intense moments of existential doubt upon staring at the roots of a tree.

https://brill.com/abstract/book/edcoll/9789004419247/BP000013.xml
Part 1 ends with an extended consideration of Camus' longstanding friendship, then enmity, with Jean-Paul Sartre. David Sprintzen here does not however deal extensively with the famous 1952 debate between the two men in Les Temps modernes. The chapter instead introduces us to the important differences between the philosophers by reference to the complexities of Camus's 1956 novella The

https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/p/pod/dod-idx/camus-and-sartre-on-the-absurd.pdf?c=phimp;idno=3521354.0021.032;format=pdf
As we will see by the end of the paper, Sartre considered the ab-surd a failure of a project, while Camus considered the absurd a prod-uct of lucidity. Sartre fails to grasp Camus's method of generating the feeling of the absurd because he conceptualizes the absurd diferently. I will start by reviewing and evaluating Sartre's interpretation

https://philarchive.org/rec/KIMCAS-5
In this paper, I highlight the philosophical differences between Camus's and Sartre's notions of the absurd. "The absurd" is a technical term for both philosophers, and they mean different things by it. The Camusian absurd is a mismatch between theoretical reasoning and practical reasoning. The Sartrean absurd, in contrast, is our

https://www.spiegel.de/international/zeitgeist/camus-and-sartre-friendship-troubled-by-ideological-feud-a-931969.html
Philosophical Differences The Falling-Out of Camus and Sartre Albert Camus and Jean-Paul Sartre, two of the most important minds of the 20th century, were closely entwined throughout their careers.

https://www.foreignaffairs.com/reviews/capsule-review/2005-01-01/camus-and-sartre-story-friendship-and-quarrel-ended-it
This excellent study of the friendship and break between Albert Camus and Jean-Paul Sartre deals with a subject that goes far beyond intellectual history; it illuminates choices that millions of French readers have personally had to make. Although both grew up without fathers, the two men came from very different milieus: Sartre was bourgeois (and hated it), whereas Camus was raised in Algeria

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/camus/
First published Thu Oct 27, 2011; substantive revision Mon Dec 13, 2021. Albert Camus (1913-1960) was a journalist, editor and editorialist, playwright and director, novelist and author of short stories, political essayist and activist—and, although he more than once denied it, a philosopher. He ignored or opposed systematic philosophy, had

https://cah.ucf.edu/fpr/article/prototypes-of-existence-and-essence-in-camuss-the-stranger/
The philosophical and political differences between Sartre and Camus are well known, and the existence/essence dichotomy is often associated only with Sartre's thought. ... Notwithstanding the bitter Camus/Jeanson/Sartre disputes in the pages of Les Temps Modernes in the 1940s and 50s, Camus understood free will, potential solidarity in

https://bigthink.com/thinking/camus-and-sartre/
Camus and Sartre thought of them as shackled to their labour and shorn of their humanity. In order to free them, new political systems must be constructed. In October 1951, Camus published The Rebel .

https://quod.lib.umich.edu/p/phimp/3521354.0021.032/1
In this paper, I highlight the philosophical differences between Camus's and Sartre's notions of the absurd. "The absurd" is a technical term for both philosophers, and they mean different things by it. The Camusian absurd is a mismatch between theoretical reasoning and practical reasoning. The Sartrean absurd, in contrast, is our

https://medium.com/serious-philosophy/sartre-on-camus-b7f093d0761e
The absurd, in Camus, without the aid of Sartre's penetrating mind, can be quite the difficult concept to understand — and yet it seems precise in a way, like it is utilized under different

https://www.reddit.com/r/philosophy/comments/rcj1vu/camus_and_sartre_what_began_as_a_close_friendship/
Abstract: Albert Camus and Jean-Paul Sartre were the two towering giants of postwar philosophy. They represent two opposing attitudes to the Cold War — Sartre believed that violence was a necessary evil in bringing about the Communist end whereas Camus believed in the value of the individual human life.

https://philarchive.org/archive/KIMCAS-5
Abstract: In this paper, I highlight the philosophical differences between Camus's and Sartre's notions of the absurd. "The absurd" is a technical term for both philosophers, and they mean different things by it. The Camusian absurd is a mismatch between theoretical reasoning and practical reasoning. The Sartrean absurd, in contrast, is

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aesthetics-existentialist/
This is the most significant difference between the existentialists and Husserlian phenomenology: the existentialists link the power to disclose the world to the necessity of human beings to decide who they should be, in terms of the fundamental values directing a person's life. ... , 2004, Sartre and Camus: A Historic Confrontation, Amherst

https://www.reddit.com/r/askphilosophy/comments/e5o19x/practical_difference_between_sartre_and_camus/
Sartre's "Marxism" is often overstated (especially by Camus), but it's clear that his political goals were much different from Camus - partially because of Sartre's rather more optimistic view of Revolution and, ultimately, the ability to structure society in a particular way. They are closer together here than Camus makes them out to be, but