https://www.historynet.com/historical-controversies/
Historical Controversies. These lingering questions about historical events still provoke heated debate — and insatiable curiosity. Confederate battle flag captured at the Battle of Mine Creek, Kansas, Oct. 24, 1864. (Heritage Auctions, Dallas) Even decades or centuries after a historic event, it can be the center of endless and spirited debate.

https://time.com/5607429/most-important-debates/
TIME spoke to several historians about the most important presidential debates and their impacts on the course of American history. John F. Kennedy vs. Richard Nixon (1960)

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2019/08/q-what-was-the-greatest-debate-in-history/592813/
One of the best debates in history was held in 1965 between the writer James Baldwin and William F. Buckley, the founder of National Review, at the University of Cambridge. Before a sea of white

https://www.neh.gov/humanities/2017/summer/feature/historians-disagree-about-everything-or-so-it-seems
China has transformed its economy, but its rulers do not want to debate its history. Tombstone, an account of the famine of 1958-62, by Yang Jisheng, is banned. Jisheng wants Chinese citizens to remember the tragedy of the past so that history will not repeat itself. Chinese officials see dwelling on such events as "historical nihilism

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/elections/2020/historic-debates/
Moderated by Frank McGee of NBC, with questions posed by a panel of journalists, the debate took place on October 7, 1960, in Washington, D.C. This content is brought to you as part of a PBS

https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/10-famous-political-debate-moments
Here's a look back at some big debate moments on the eve of Monday's presidential nominee debate between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. 1. Abraham Lincoln and Stephen Douglas set the debate gold standard. In 1858, the two legendary speakers met seven times in Illinois during a Senate contest. Each had to make a one-hour opening statement

https://www.newsweek.com/debate-that-changed-history-opinion-1534367
The Lincoln-Douglas debates of 1858 altered the course of history. The central question addressed in the campaign was profound: would the nation continue drifting away from the principles of the

https://www.open.edu/openlearn/history-the-arts/history/why-do-historians-disagree
The reasons why historians disagree are many and varied, but the following represent some of them: Questions of the selection and relevance of evidence. The method and the techniques of history. Ideology and political predisposition. The purpose for which history is studied in the first place. More recently, arguments about the validity of

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/argument/supplement.html
The popularity of debates dates back to the early stages in the history of Indian thought (as early as 1700 BCE), but the first theories of argumentation only appeared around the time of the Buddha and other religious reformers (6 th century BCE). By the third and second centuries BCE, monks and Brahmans were required to have training in the

https://www.bbc.co.uk/mediacentre/mediapacks/ww1/hdd
Historian David Reynolds explores the legacy of the Great War in a new three-part series for BBC Two. He traces how the conflict haunted the generation who lived through it and how it shaped the

https://www.cultures-of-history.uni-jena.de/debates/
How historical 'facts' are understood is a matter of negotiation and is sometimes subject to intense debate amongst not just professional historians but also the public at large. In this section, we present public debates and controversies that emerge at different points in time and in a variety of local, national and trans-national contexts.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debate
Debate is a process that involves formal discourse, discussion, and oral addresses on a particular topic or collection of topics, often with a moderator and an audience. In a debate, arguments are put forward for common opposing viewpoints. Debates have historically occurred in public meetings, academic institutions, debate halls, coffeehouses

https://library.fiveable.me/key-terms/ap-gov/historical-debates
Historical Debates - Historical debates refer to past discussions and arguments centered around a particular subject matter. When examining historical debates, it is important to consider the context, events, and societal norms of the time period.

https://www.historians.org/research-and-publications/perspectives-on-history/september-2013/disagreement-debate-discussion
Disagreement, Debate, Discussion. James Grossman | Sep 1, 2013. This is the theme of the AHA's 2014 annual meeting. We intend this conference, in Washington, DC, to offer a model of civil and constructive "disagreement and debate." Without the disagreement—and without the civility—teaching and scholarship would be severely impoverished.

https://libguides.tccd.edu/c.php?g=186456&p=1232439
Historical Debate Paper. The purpose of this paper is for you to explore a controversial decision or topic in American history and to eventually reach a conclusion about it. You will pick one of the topics listed below and then consult your notes, read the appropriate sections of the textbook, and do independent research on the topic.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/historians-debate-americas-sordid-history-racism-confederate-monuments/story?id=71486827
Historians debate America's history of racism and Confederate monuments . Protesters have dismounted several statues around the world. By Christina Carrega and Karma Allen. July 18, 2020, 11:28 AM.

https://www.historians.org/research-and-publications/perspectives-on-history/december-2009/debating-the-past-academic-and-popular-histories-in-india
However, the interventions by academic historians of India in such debates cannot have a significant impact unless, as Partha Chatterjee has rightly pointed out, they also begin to write in languages other than English, since "only original writing in the Indian languages can take up the challenge of fashioning a new conceptual language and

https://www.learningleaders.com/insights/the-history-of-debate-from-ancient-greece-to-remote-learning
Debate is an ancient form of argumentation. It was first used as a way to resolve disputes, but it soon became apparent that it could also be used as a tool for teaching people how to think critically and argue effectively. It originated in Greece around 500 BC with Socrates, who used it as an educational tool in his philosophy classes at the

https://www.esu.org/news-and-views/what-is-debating-history-developments-relevancy/
The history of debating. Debating in various forms can be traced back to intellectual sparring matches waged between the world-famous philosophers of Ancient Greece or the scholars of Ancient India. The Greek philosopher Socrates (c. 470-399 BC) sought to understand the world by teasing out the assumptions and principles that, often unwittingly

https://www.cnn.com/2024/05/15/politics/what-to-know-history-of-presidential-debates/index.html
A tradition that dates back to 1960. The first televised presidential debates, between John F. Kennedy and Richard Nixon in 1960, occurred in television studios with no live audience present

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/05/15/best-presidential-debate-moments/73698508007/
It was the first televised presidential debate in U.S. history. The primetime event set in motion a new era of politics that has since relied on spectacle, the appearance of candidates, and the

https://www.military.com/history/what-d-day-actually-stands.html
The USS Nevada fires on positions ashore during the landings at Utah Beach on D-Day, June 6, 1944. (Wikimedia Commons) What the "D" in D-Day actually stands for has been a source of debate almost

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/rfk-jr-debate-dilemma-politics-desk-rcna153358
RFK Jr. presents a historical debate dilemma By Steve Kornacki. In his quest to qualify for the presidential debates, independent candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. could confront organizers and

https://listverse.com/2017/08/27/10-historical-controversies-with-recent-developments/
Sometimes, it can be very difficult to distinguish historical fact from historical fiction. In some cases, the lack of solid evidence makes a definitive conclusion impossible, while in others, new findings keep changing the official story. Academic biases can also muddy the waters at times. Many things in history are open to passionate debate.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Historic_debates
Wikipedia:Historic debates. This page is a short description of large-scale disputes that have occurred on Wikipedia and have shaped its evolution. The list is arranged in chronological order. Provide inline citations to evidence of the dispute, including: permalinks to talk pages/talk page archives, RfCs, RfARBs and archived mailing list posts

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/16/us/politics/campaign-debates-trump-biden.html
With Debate Deal, Trump and Biden Sideline a Storied Campaign Institution. For nearly 40 years, the Commission on Presidential Debates has made the rules for the most-watched events in politics.

https://www.axios.com/2024/05/26/rfk-jr-threshold-2024-presidential-debate
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has a shot to make the June presidential debate, but the clock is ticking on two challenging thresholds. Why it matters: He would be the first independent presidential candidate to make the debate stage in 32 years — and just the third in presidential debate history. Kennedy has the financial support, aggressive ballot access plan and strong polling to make his long

https://theweek.com/politics/the-short-history-of-tv-debates-and-uk-general-elections
The televised debates are essentially "private events conducted by political parties, who do deals with individual broadcasters", said Sky News's Adam Boulton. This means the TV channels "compete

https://www.wsj.com/politics/elections/biden-proposes-presidential-debates-with-trump-but-without-debate-commission-ccb58515
President Biden and Donald Trump have agreed to two new debates, bypassing the commission that typically oversees presidential debates. WSJ's Catherine Lucey explains the significance of their plan.

https://www.afl.com.au/news/1140436/umpire-boss-stephen-mcburney-explains-holding-the-ball-as-debate-rages
The interpretation of the holding the ball rule is in the spotlight after the two coaches from Saturday's match between Carlton and Gold Coast, Michael Voss and Damien Hardwick, said they would seek clarification from the League about how it is being adjudicated. Hardwick pinpointed a tackle from Suns defender Mac Andrew on Blues forward Charlie Curnow, where Curnow had an arm free in the