https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFpx7uuAS40
In this video, we showcase the results of Nvidia's DLSS 3 frame generation technology in several popular games: Cyberpunk 2077, Dying Light 2, Hogwarts Legac

https://www.reddit.com/r/nvidia/comments/xjo42x/for_those_complaining_about_dlss3_exclusivity/
DLSS 3 consists of 3 technologies - DLSS Frame Generation, DLSS Super Resolution, and NVIDIA Reflex. DLSS Frame Generation uses RTX 40 Series high-speed Optical Flow Accelerator to calculate the motion flow that is used for the AI network, then executes the network on 4th Generation Tensor Cores.

https://www.techspot.com/article/2546-dlss-3/
The most common issue with DLSS 3 in motion is slight sizzling and flickering of moving objects. One frame, the normally rendered frame, will be of high quality; the next frame will be a generated

https://www.reddit.com/r/nvidia/comments/1aqmd6l/what_you_think_about_dlss_3_precisely_frame/
Yes and no. Nvidia's proprietary dlss frame gen tech is currently 40 series only. AMD's fsr3 frame gen tech is theoretically open source, but not yet implemented in a lot of a games. AFMF is available only on 6000 and 7000 cards, works on most games, but uses a very different approach so isn't directly comparable to dlss frame gen or fsr3.

https://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/why-i-leave-dlss-3-off-in-games/
Like most other games with DLSS 3 support, I jumped into the graphics menu and flipped on Frame Generation, and instead of Super Resolution, I opted for Nvidia's Deep Learning Anti-Aliasing

https://www.rockpapershotgun.com/dlss-3-how-it-works-how-it-performs-and-when-you-should-use-it
Where the game changes is in DLSS 3's frame generation feature. When switched on, as it is optional, the GPU will use its AI smarts to create entire new frames, and quietly slot them in-between the rendered ones. Not unlike the upscaling process, it uses data from surrounding frames to predict what the next generated frame should look like.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9l0W21sL7Gk
What is DLSS 3 frame generation? Can it really double framerates? What are the downsides? In this video, I go in-depth on my hands-on experience using DLSS 3

https://www.tomshardware.com/news/dlss-3-early-review-rtx-4090
Portal RTX showed the biggest performance leap with DLSS 3 — with a whopping 5.5x frame rate boost over native 4k rendering. DLSS 3 was 2.2x faster than DLSS 2 in performance mode — though

https://www.pcworld.com/article/1662185/what-is-dlss-3-nvidia-geforce-rtx-ai-feature-explained.html
Including both AI-powered frame generation and Nvidia's wondrous latency-reducing Reflex technology, DLSS 3.0 makes for a potent recipe. And with the release of affordable new GeForce RTX 4060

https://www.techpowerup.com/review/msi-geforce-rtx-4080-super-expert/36.html
With this generation, NVIDIA introduces DLSS 3, which adds a completely new way of generating frames. While DLSS 2 focused on upscaling and supersampling, DLSS 3 Frame Generation takes two frames and generates an intermediate frame in-between, based on how things have moved in between these two frames. The underlying hardware engine, the

https://www.gamersdirector.com/graphics-cards/what-is-dlss-3-frame-generation/
Why DLSS Is Better Without Frame Generation. So, the extra frames netted by DLSS 3.0 Frame Generation are essentially extra "phantom" frames that only improve visual fluidity, not game feel. Like a little joke between your GPU and your monitor that your game is blissfully unaware of, or consciously ignoring the implications of.

https://www.reddit.com/r/nvidia/comments/yf24x7/dlss_30_with_frame_generation_is_awesome_these/
These are my own results. : r/nvidia. DLSS 3.0 with 'Frame Generation' is awesome! These are my own results. Archived post. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. so basically, when you play with frames generation at 120fps, based on frames generated at 60fps, you more or less have the responsiveness of a 30fps game. 22 votes

https://www.pcguide.com/gpu/why-dlss-is-such-a-divisive-technology/
As DLSS requiring AI integration is limited to just RTX cards, which means even if DLSS 3.7 is putting a nail in the coffin of performance. Those rocking an older Pascal card mean that you're not getting to enjoy the tech and get a boost. DLSS 3.5 vs DLSS 3 frame gen with ray reconstruction, source: BGFG.

https://nvidianews.nvidia.com/news/nvidia-introduces-dlss-3-with-breakthrough-ai-powered-frame-generation-for-up-to-4x-performance
Combining the DLSS-generated frames with the DLSS super-resolution frames enables DLSS 3 to reconstruct seven-eighths of the displayed pixels with AI, boosting frame rates by up to 4x compared to without DLSS. Because DLSS Frame Generation executes as a post-process on the GPU, it can boost frame rates even when the game is bottlenecked by the CPU.

https://hothardware.com/news/dlss-3-frame-generation-digital-foundry-testing
The initial DLSS 3 frame generation demo using Spider-Man shows just how much smoother gameplay can appear. Granted, this is a scene with very little de-occlusion as the camera is moving forwards

https://www.tweaktown.com/news/93814/nvidia-says-dlss-3-frame-generation-working-on-geforce-rtx-20-and-30-series-gpus-was-bug/index.html
A definite cause for concern and a smoking gun for those adamant that NVIDIA could get Frame Generation to work on older GeForce RTX GPUs. However, this was a bug in an older DLSS DLL that simply

https://www.sportskeeda.com/gaming-tech/dlss-3-vs-fsr-3-frame-generation-which-is-best
FSR 3: It also generates frames between existing ones, but its performance gains are similar to or higher than DLSS 3. FSR 3 is good at retaining detail, especially in scenes with complex textures

https://linustechtips.com/topic/1552794-what-is-difference-between-dlss-2-dlss3-dlss-35-and-frame-generation/
As of now, Frame Gen only runs on 40 series cards. Frame gen also requires SR to already be running in a driver lockout (this is a good thing). As well as improved revisions of DLAA/SR 3.5 added Ray Reconstruction, an AI-enhanced denoiser, this one does not have any performance or frame rate impacts, it simply put, makes the Ray tracing look

https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/gpus/nvidias-next-gen-dlss-may-leverage-ai
Asset generation is a step beyond DLSS 3 frame generation, with in-game assets generated entirely from scratch through DLSS. ... It's why I hate the "fake frames" BS spouted by people as a way to

https://www.reddit.com/r/hardware/comments/1b77qjo/computerbase_translated_dlss_3_vs_fsr_3_review/
According to a recent answer to a fan question on Digital Foundry's podcast, FSR-FG is much more performant than DLSS-FG because it's using lower resolution maps (if that's the right term) for its optical flow . The claim Battaglia makes about FSR-FG using lower resolution optical flow fields is conjecture, he hasn't actually tested it yet and explicitly says as much in the video.

https://www.nvidia.com/en-in/geforce/news/nvidia-dlss-3-5-ray-reconstruction/
Combining Super Resolution, Frame Generation and Ray Reconstruction, DLSS 3.5 multiplies Cyberpunk 2077 frame rates by a total of 5X compared to native 4K DLSS OFF rendering. Note that games with multiple ray-traced effects may have several denoisers that are replaced by the single Ray Reconstruction neural network. In these cases, Ray

https://www.reddit.com/r/nvidia/comments/zmkz7f/i_feel_like_dlss3_frame_generation_isnt_getting/
Doubling 58 into 116 frames in darktide or portal has basically no noticeable input lag. I'd say under that, it depends on the stability of the framerate. When you have a lot of cpu stutters it shows in the input lag feel. If the framerate is constant, I'd says over 80fps WITH FG enabled has very low input lag.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_learning_super_sampling
Deep learning super sampling (DLSS) is a family of real-time deep learning image enhancement and upscaling technologies developed by Nvidia that are exclusive to its RTX line of graphics cards, and available in a number of video games.The goal of these technologies is to allow the majority of the graphics pipeline to run at a lower resolution for increased performance, and then infer a higher

https://us.forums.blizzard.com/en/wow/t/dlss-frame-gen-or-working-fsr/1883013
Define "good" because the specs for the game don't support that claim, at least to me lol. Good = 150+ fps in the new zones on max settings with ray tracing. You will not get that on max settings on a toaster pc. You will be around 40 fps on a 1080 gtx. which is trash.

https://www.reddit.com/r/nvidia/comments/14vr74f/in_what_cases_frame_generation_and_dlss_3_are/
Frame Generation is currently used in only a few titles (more will come out eventually), but it's not magic. Your base performance with DLSS needs to be higher, as in ideally 60fps+ because it duplicates frames and if there's not enough frames to work with, frame generation won't be that useful.

https://www.reddit.com/r/buildapc/comments/1583cwc/why_the_hate_for_dlss/
I dont think people hate dlss. Its just nvidia is trying to sold features and not good generational impovement, like it was with 30 series. For example, 3060ti is faster than 2080s and both have access to dlss. But with 40 series you buy 4060ti, get performance of 3060ti but with frame gen which is for some unknown reason called dlss 3.