https://photographylife.com/comparison/sony-a6400-vs-sony-a6700
Some of the biggest differences are in the realm of video performance. The Sony a6400 isn't a terrible camera for video - it can still shoot 4K, after all - but the Sony a6700 definitely ups the ante. With 10-bit 4:2:2 internal video possible, you can simply get higher quality footage out of the a6700, better suited for extensive post

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UWUGkJQ6cOI
Sony A6400 vs Sony A6700 and to see what the difference is between the two cameras and if the price difference is really worth the upgrade.Sony a6400: https:

https://www.photographyblog.com/articles/sony_a6700_vs_sony_a6400_which_is_better
The image sensor is one of the biggest difference between the A6700 and the A6400, and a good reason why you should choose one over the other. The new Sony A6700 has the same 26 megapixel Exmor R backside-illuminated (BSI) CMOS sensor that was used in the FX30 cinema camera, joined by the latest Bionz XR processor.

https://www.rtings.com/camera/tools/compare/sony-a6400-vs-sony-a6700/8710/24964
The Sony α6700 is better than the Sony α6400. Beyond its new and improved sensor, with a new processor, it's also better built, with a weather-sealed body, and has slightly better ergonomics. While image and video quality aren't far off, the a6700 has significantly better video specs, with internal 10-bit capture and more frame rate options.

https://www.alphashooters.com/compare/sony-a6400-vs-a6700/
The Sony a6400 features 425 phase and 425 contrast detection AF points that cover 84% of the image area. The a6700 improves on this with up to 759 phase detection points, covering approximately 93% of the image area when shooting stills. For shooting movies this reduces to a maximum of 495 points.

https://versus.com/en/sony-a6400-vs-sony-alpha-6700
Has phase-detection autofocus for videos. Sony A6400. Sony Alpha 6700. A phase-detection autofocus system is faster than a contrast detection autofocus system. Even when recording scenes with a lot of fast movements, the videos are sharp and clear. has continuous autofocus when recording movies. Sony A6400.

https://www.campkinscameras.com/guides/sony-a6700-vs-a6400/
The new 26-megapixel sensor on the A6700 marks a decent upgrade over the A6400's 24.2 MP sensor, offering about 7% more pixels. This higher-resolution sensor will provide you with more flexibility for cropping your photos and should offer a slightly better dynamic range.

https://thepcenthusiast.com/sony-a6700-vs-a6400-mirrorless-camera-which-one/
Unlike the a6400, its LCD monitor is limited to tilting up or down only. The touchscreen display on the a6700 is also sharper and better, with 1.036 million dots, unlike on the a6400, which has 921.6 thousand does only. By the way, the Sony a6700 does not have a built-in flash, unlike the a6400. However, with a camera like the a6700 or even the

https://www.digitalcameraworld.com/buying-guides/sony-a6000-vs-a6100-vs-a6300-vs-a6400-vs-a6500-vs-a6600-how-do-you-choose
The Sony A6100, A6400 and A6600 could be considered as replacements for the Sony A6000, A6300 and A6500 respectively. And now the A6700 is essentially the successor to the A6600's crown. but while the old ones remain on sale, there are still seven cameras to choose from.

https://www.reddit.com/r/SonyAlpha/comments/15sqowi/a6400_vs_a6700/
Uses are mainly wildlife photography and sometimes she photographs her boyfriend's band. Right now, the a6700+70-350mm is €2200 (netherlands), but i also found an a6400 with. Sony 18-105mm f4 G OSS. Sony 70-350mm f4.5-6.3 G OSS For €1600 (second hand, 4509clicks).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-g5EvF_6I-c
I've had my hands on Sony's all-new A6700 camera for a few weeks now and have been loving every minute with it. In this video I break down the top 5 reasons

https://www.reddit.com/r/SonyAlpha/comments/1atk965/a6700_vs_a6400/
A6700 vs a6400 . I am looking to get one from those two. I just recently moved from Fuji (xs10). The difference is 797 AUD (500 USD) between those camera. Is it worth jumping to a6700? I mostly used it as an amateur photography/video. For travel, family. ... First new camera and went A6700 with Sony 200-600. I am loving it!

https://mirrorlessbychristine.com/2024/04/14/sony-a6400-vs-a6700/
The Verdict: Sony A6400 vs A6700. The Sony A6400 and A6700 are both excellent mirrorless cameras that offer a wide range of features and capabilities. The A6400 is a great choice for photographers who are looking for a compact and lightweight camera with excellent image quality and autofocus. The A6700 is a better choice for photographers who

https://camerareviews.com/compare/sony-a6400-vs-sony-a6700/
Check our Sony a6400 vs Sony a6700 camera comparison of specs, features, prices and scores. Which of these cameras is the better choice for you? ... This means we may receive a commission if you purchase something by clicking on one of our links. CameraReviews is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w8DIBDjpOAM
Guys, the new Sony A6700 landed straight in the studio. I got to test it out and filmed a comparison video with Sony A6400! Here are the results.#a6700 #Sony

https://www.ulanzi.com/blogs/news/sony-a6700-vs-sony-a6400-which-one-is-better-what-are-the-differences
The launch price of the Sony A6700 is substantially higher than the A6400's back in 2019. A price-tag of $1398 body only, $1498 with the Sony E PZ 16-50mm F3.5-5.6 OSS kit lens or $1798 with the E 18-135mm F3.5-5.6 OSS zoom lens does make the new Sony A6700 more expensive than when the A6400 was launched back in 2019.

https://pxlmag.com/db/camera-compare/Sony-Alpha-a6400-vs-Sony-Alpha-a6700
Below is a in-depth comparison of the Sony A6400 and Sony A6700, both Advanced Mirrorless digital cameras and they are both created by Sony. The resolution of the A6400 (24MP) and the A6700 (26MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras provide the identical sensor sizing (APS-C). The A6400 was launched 5 years before the A6700 and that is

https://www.reddit.com/r/SonyAlpha/comments/1aq6db3/ibis_worth_the_extra_cost_a6400_vs_a6700/
I bought a Sony A6400 in December and am loving the form factor and image quality compared to my old Nikon DSLR. But, having a bit of buyers remorse, wondering if I should've ponied up the extra cash for the A6700 for the IBIS (plus newer UI, bigger battery, backlit sensor, etc). I don't shoot much video, but noticed my night shots even with

https://www.dpreview.com/articles/0072788087/should-i-buy-the-sony-a6400-here-s-how-it-compares
The Sony a6400 is the company's latest midrange mirrorless camera. Its body, 24MP sensor and many of its specs are familiar from the existing model, the a6300. And, because it's a new model, the a6400 is, initially at least, more expensive relative to the lineup it fits into. So is it better to buy an older model at a discount price, rather

https://www.reddit.com/r/SonyAlpha/comments/1c8tlvk/a7cii_vs_a6700_from_a6400/
For landscape a sony 12-24, sigma 14-24 or 16-35 would be a great choice (any version just not the zeiss), for wild life of course a long lens would be needed. The 70-350 would be significantly worse on the a7cii than on the a6700. You'd have much lower resolution. Only go FF if you can afford good FF lenses because whatever benefit the FF

https://tech-on-a-budget.com/sony-a6700-vs-sony-a6400-which-is-better/
The image sensor is one of the biggest difference between the A6700 and the A6400, and a good reason why you should choose one over the other. The new Sony A6700 has the same 26 megapixel Exmor R backside-illuminated (BSI) CMOS sensor that was used in the FX30 cinema camera, joined by the latest Bionz XR processor.

https://www.reddit.com/r/SonyAlpha/comments/1681r73/should_i_still_consider_a6400_or_a6600/
The other advantage the A6600 has is a larger battery so better battery life. There are some other advantages to the A6600 but IMO these are the main ones. Of course the A6700 is quite an upgrade so it has quite a few advantages over the A6600 however it's also a lot more money than a used A6400 or A6600. 6. Reply.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/sony-a6700-review/ar-AA1dMk1i
The Sony a6700 features a 26-megapixel APS-C back-side illuminated (BSI) CMOS sensor from Sony's Exmor R range, capable of ISO 100-32,000 (80-102,400 extended) and supported by 5-axis in-body

https://www.rtings.com/camera/tools/compare/sony-a6700-vs-canon-eos-r10/24964/33705
The Sony α6700 is better overall than the Canon EOS R10. It has a sturdier, weather-sealed body and more portable design than the Canon, though the EOS R10 has better ergonomics and a larger viewfinder. Physical differences aside, the Sony has a more reliable overall autofocus system and better internal video recording capabilities, with support for Log recording and more frame rate options.

https://www.reddit.com/r/SonyAlpha/comments/17dpmay/opinions_on_a6700_for_landscape_photography/
For compactness, I would go for the a6600 over the a6700. The latter is way more expensive and, video aside, it's almost the same camera. For me it's a 3 answer question. Go for the a6400 - you won't get IBIS or the better battery, but the batteries are cheaper and a good stabilized lens will get you everything you need.