https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQ07tWOzE_c
For more like this subscribe to the Open University channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXsH4hSV_kEdAOsupMMm4QwFree learning from The Open Universityhtt

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/14789299211069499
About 25 years after the publication of securitization theory's (ST) seminal texts - Wæver's chapter Securitization and Desecuritization (1995) and Buzan et al.'s book Security: A New Framework for Analysis (1998) 1 - the theory is undoubtedly at a crossroads. Journals publish special issues debating the framework's strengths and weaknesses (International Relations, 2015; Polity

https://www.e-ir.info/2018/01/14/securitisation-theory-an-introduction/
A referent object, a central idea in securitisation, is the thing that is threatened and needs to be protected. Securitisation theorists determined five sectors: the economic, the societal, the military, the political and the environmental sector. In each sector, a specific threat is articulated as threatening a referent object.

https://www.jstor.org/stable/26928568
of the theory derives from its constructivist ontology and clear framework. However, the t. eory has various limitations including lack of the analysis of rival views. This study aims to outline the strengths and limitation. of Securitization Theory and present a novel framework for securitization. The new framework provides a dual.

https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/abstract/document/obo-9780199743292/obo-9780199743292-0091.xml
European Journal of International Relations 4.4 (1998): 479-505. DOI: 10.1177/1354066198004004004. Details the development of the Copenhagen school and critically discusses the idea of securitization as a speech act that follows a specific grammar. It also links securitization theory to other innovations introduced into security studies by

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Securitization_(international_relations)
Securitization in international relations and national politics is the process of state actors transforming subjects from regular political issues into matters of "security": thus enabling extraordinary means to be used in the name of security. Issues that become securitized do not necessarily represent issues that are essential to the objective survival of a state, but rather represent issues

https://academic.oup.com/isr/article/19/4/646/3884515
Securitization theory's original emphasis on speech acts comes from the use of John Austin's philosophy of ordinary language (1962), which claims that in some instances language does not simply describe things or states of affairs, but also does something through its very utterance—hence the concept of a "speech act".The classical example of a speech act is that of a priest declaring

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0047117815596590
Securitization theory seeks to explain the politics through which (1) the security character of public problems is established, (2) the social commitments resulting from the collective acceptance that a phenomenon is a threat are fixed and (3) the possibility of a particular policy is created. In the last decade, research on securitization has

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/14789299211069499?download=true
We proceed in three parts, plus a concluding discussion. In the first section, we present the data on which the review is based, a unique and rigorously selected corpus of 171 academic papers on securitization published over the past 25 years. In the second and third sections, we use our data to discuss ST's two main imbalances under scrutiny.

https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-93035-6_2
2.1 Introduction. The aim of the chapter is to provide a closer look at the Copenhagen School of security 1 and its proposition of securitisation theory. In doing so, it will focus on the discussion on the main conceptual building blocks of the theory, outlining their characteristics and critique reflected in the current securitisation literature.

https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-48893-2_3
Revolutionary securitization: An anthropological extension of securitization theory. International Theory, 4(2), 165-197. Article Google Scholar Huysmans, J. (2004). A Foucaultian view on spill-over: Freedom and security in the EU. Journal of International Relations and Development, 7(3), 294-318.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340115909_Securitization_revisited_theories_and_cases
This paper is a critical review of the article "Securitization" revisited: theories and cases. written b y Thierry Balzacq, Sarah Leonard and Jan Ruzicka. (Thierry Balzacq, 2015) This. paper

https://oxfordre.com/politics/abstract/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-479
Summary. Since it was launched in the mid-1990s, the concept of securitization has consistently been in vogue, at least among European scholars of world politics and security studies. The idea of viewing security as intersubjective, where anyone or anything can be a threat if constructed as such, is both an appealing and useful

https://academic.oup.com/isq/article/63/1/177/5265229
The Adoption of a Strategy of Deterrence. Securitization theory allows us to effectively capture and theorize the dynamics of adopting deterrence strategy, challenging the traditional assumption that this is a self-evident process. Instead, we can think of adopting a strategy of deterrence as a securitizing move.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/07393148.2019.1596682
ABSTRACT. This article develops a poststructuralist framework for the analysis of the process of threat construction or securitization. Taking on-going debates in securitization theory about the securitizing process as a starting point, the article draws on the poststructuralist discourse theory of the Essex School to theorize what makes some securitizing moves (attempts to securitize a

https://www.jstor.org/stable/20542789
Journal of International Relations and Development, 7:4 (2004), pp. 388^413; Thierry Balzacq, 'The Three Faces of Securitization: Political Agency, Audience and Context', European Journal of International Relations, 11:2 (2005), pp.171-201; Holger Stritzel, 'Towards a Theory of Securitiza

https://dl1.cuni.cz/mod/resource/view.php?id=384113&lang=en
securitization theory faces three types of challenges, related, respectively, to theory, method and methodology. The capacity of scholars to overcome those will strongly influence the extent ... Security Studies and International Relations in the years to come. Keywords case studies, evolution, methods, securitization, theory, analytics of

https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/review-of-international-studies/article/abs/securitisation-terror-and-control-towards-a-theory-of-the-breaking-point/ED0C63EB64DE394A8B8B793C9EB0387C
15 Salter, M., 'Securitization and desecuritization: a dramaturgical analysis of the Canadian Air Transport Security Authority', Journal of International Relations and Development, 11: 4 (2008)CrossRef Google Scholar; Buzan, B. and Wæver, O., 'Macrosecuritization and security constellations: reconsidering scale in securitization theory

https://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/1082/1/WRAP_Floyd_Securitization_theory_and_securitization_studies_WRAP.pdf
That is the meaning of security. To prevent 'everything' from becoming a security issue, a successful securitization consists of three steps. These are: (1) identification of existential threats; (2) emergency action; and (3) effects on inter-unit relations by breaking free of rules (Buzan et al. 1998: 6).

https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/edit/10.4324/9780203868508/securitization-theory-thierry-balzacq
ABSTRACT. This volume aims to provide a new framework for the analysis of securitization processes, increasing our understanding of how security issues emerge, evolve and dissolve. Securitisation theory has become one of the key components of security studies and IR courses in recent years, and this book represents the first attempt to provide

https://www.oxfordpoliticstrove.com/abstract/10.1093/hepl/9780198862192.001.0001/hepl-9780198862192-chapter-12
Abstract. This chapter introduces securitization theory, situating its intellectual roots and tracing its emergence and evolution as a framework for analysis, and spelling out its main concepts and dimensions. The chapter also presents four empirical cases in securitization research—migration, religion, the environment and climate change, and

https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/review-of-international-studies/article/abs/security-and-the-problem-of-context-a-hermeneutical-critique-of-securitisation-theory/0AF1B257904CB8CF4263238B94AF6E97
13 Thierry Balzacq, 'The Three Faces of Securitization: Political Agency, Audience and Context', European Journal of International Relations, 11:2 (2005), pp. 171-201; Holger Stritzel, 'Towards a Theory of Securitization: Copenhagen and beyond', European Journal of International Relations, 13:3, pp. 357-83. See also Williams

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273904166_What_kind_of_theory_-_If_any_-_Is_securitization
The task of a sociological theory of securitization is not just to. grasp what it means to say that a phenomenon is a threat, however; it wants to decipher. the sequences of cause-and-effect in