https://www.youtube.com/@ninnoslav
NN Publicity je nova agencija na trzištu Srbije koja se bavi PR, konsaltingom i marketingom. Cilj agencije je što jasnije pozicioniranje klijenata u okviru svih medijskih platformi print,TV

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-017-0032-1
On the one hand, "actual publicity can be looked at through the prism of hypothetical publicity" (Gosseries 2005, p 10); on the other, despite Kant's abstract approach to politics in general

https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1740&context=plr
3 Factors Etc., Inc. stated that recognizing a descendible right of pub-licity would not "enlarge the stock or quality of the goods, services, artistic creativity, information, invention or entertainment avail-. able.' 4 Yet, the posthumous disposition of the publicity of that case's subject, Elvis Presley, refutes this argument.

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/publicity/
The ideas of "public rules" and "public reason" have now become important in political philosophy. We shall briefly present and discuss them. 1. Hypothetical Publicity. 1.1 Kant's Hypothetical Publicity Test. 1.2 Sidgwick on Covert Utilitarianism. 1.3 Sidgwick's and Kant's Examples. 1.3.1 Sidgwick on Celibacy and Lying.

https://sites.law.duq.edu/juris/2023/11/15/the-rise-of-nil-and-rights-of-publicity/
The American Bar Association (ABA) defines the right of publicity as, "the inherent right to control the commercial use of one's identity.". [6] As of 2020, only 35 states recognize the right of publicity, either by statute or common law, yet the Supreme Court has only addressed the right of publicity once, in Zacchini v.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/2158379X.2021.1879571
ABSTRACT. Why does publicity matter for democratic politics? This article challenges the deliberative view of publicity's democratic value, making the case that publicity matters because it brings together people who stand to one another in relations of power, constraining the powerful to engage politically those whose action they affect, and enabling the oppressed to form new, oppositional

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2013/06/24/the-prism
Still more influential than Bentham's ideas about publicity, though, was the growing fetish for privacy in an age of domesticity. (The history of privacy is bounded; privacy, as an aspiration

https://www.hup.harvard.edu/books/9780674980983
Who controls how one's identity is used by others? This legal question, centuries old, demands greater scrutiny in the Internet age. Jennifer Rothman uses the right of publicity—a little-known law, often wielded by celebrities—to answer that question, not just for the famous but for everyone. In challenging the conventional story of the right of publicity's emergence, development, and

https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-72637-3_2
This is 'publicity'—a mode through which the public self-witnesses as collective and comes into being as a virtual object. This corresponds to Dewey's ( 1954) point that when association or collective action is observed, it takes on a new value , forcing individuals to reflect on that connection.

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1556264619850736
He writes that "the age of photography corresponds precisely to the explosion of the private into the public, or rather into the creation of a new social value, which is the publicity of the private: the private is consumed as such, publicly" (Barthes, 1980, p. 98). This description is prescient for digital platforms like Instagram where

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s41254-017-0093-3
He believed publicity thwarted the chances of gaining trust among the negotiating parties and that public debate could succumb to emotionalism (Kissinger 2011 [1979], p. 382). That said, following Kissinger's reasoning, diplomacy was almost by definition somehow public, since even closed negotiations were conducted via publically owned

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13183222.2018.1418818
3 It is not always possible to refer to visibility instead of publicity as the two concepts, although overlapping in meaning, are not synonymous. 4 See Dahlberg ( Citation 2013 ) for further discussion of the disagreement between Habermasian deliberative democrats and poststructuralist discourse theorists about the ontological grounding and

https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/nulr/vol111/iss4/1/
Eric E. Johnson, Disentangling the Right of Publicity , 111 N w. U. L. R ev . 891 (2017). Despite the increasing importance attached to the right of publicity, its doctrinal scope has yet to be clearly articulated. The right of publicity supposedly allows a cause of action for the commercial exploitation of a person's name, voice, or image.

https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-322-87749-9_2
Abstract. It is strange, but true, that public opinion research, mass communications research and public opinion theory have become disconnected. It is difficult even to explain how any one of these can exist without the others, and yet the fact is that each has wandered off on its own. It is to the great credit of Elisabeth Noelle-Neumann that

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-017-0032-1.pdf
publicity (Bennington, 2011)); ii) that there are questions con- cerning both the relationship between self-frustration and injus- tice in Kant's account and the scope of public maxims (Gosseries,

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/smj.3030
Research Summary Media coverage is known to influence firms' behavior, but it is less known whether coverage of firms' partners also has an effect. In a context of governance practices' diffusion in

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/9781118766804.wbiect031
Abstract. "Publicness" has been considered one of the fundamental principles of democratic governance by normative theories of public opinion since the late 18th century. The idea of publicness arose in the context of the interaction of civil society and the state. As an ethical principle referring to discursive visibility, publicness was

https://www.diplomacy.edu/blog/no-such-thing-bad-publicity/
The text discusses the impact of negative publicity on national image, using examples like Formula One in Bahrain and Euro 2012 in Ukraine and Poland. It highlights the challenge of controlling foreign media during international events and the potential consequences of attempting to hide controversial issues. The text cautions governments that negative publicity can have lasting effects on a

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/01914537231203555
A: Well, assemblies are a form of publicity. I mean, we have to take publicity to be both: ontologically composed of speech and action at the same time. We are talking about speech acts, and that includes occupying a public square or all sorts of things: civil disobedience, performing abortions illegally and saying: 'I had an abortion!'

https://www.academia.edu/5759953/The_Structural_Organization_of_NGO_Publicity_Explaining_Divergent_Publicity_Strategies_at_Humanitarian_and_Human_Rights_Organizations
The publicity professional explained further how difficult it was to get research staff to care about reaching the general public. I was asking one researcher to make a call to a family of a person who had been unfairly imprisoned for a long time on spurious charges, and I asked her to help nail down the facts, which is obviously of primary

https://www.npr.org/2013/02/22/172589123/for-publicist-marvin-levy-its-all-about-eyeballs
Levy started his career in New York writing questions for quiz shows. He wound up in publicity for MGM radio and TV personalities, but was lured to Hollywood in the mid-1970s.

https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Exploring-the-effects-of-negative-publicity%3A-News-a-Kim-Carvalho/103e761d051a5f4e5cd0c32500cac54e5b450747
DOI: 10.1016/J.PUBREV.2007.02.018 Corpus ID: 144602537; Exploring the effects of negative publicity: News coverage and public perceptions of a university @article{Kim2007ExploringTE, title={Exploring the effects of negative publicity: News coverage and public perceptions of a university}, author={Sei-Hill Kim and John Carvalho and Christy Cooksey}, journal={Public Relations Review}, year={2007

https://www.nytimes.com/1991/01/18/opinion/l-public-relations-was-lobbying-from-the-start-560791.html
The country's first publicity agency was the Publicity Bureau, established in Boston in 1900 by three former newspapermen, George V. S. Michaelis, Thomas Marvin and Herbert Small "to do a general