https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5429540/
Clinical classification in low back pain: best-evidence diagnostic rules based on systematic reviews ... CS might be explained by an amplification of neural signaling within the central nervous system that ... Manniche C, Ekdahl C, Jacobsen S. Diagnostic classification of non-specific low back pain. A new system integrating patho-anatomic and

https://academic.oup.com/ptj/article/96/7/1057/2864925
The treatment-based classification (TBC) system for the treatment of patients with low back pain (LBP) has been in use by clinicians since 1995. This perspective article describes how the TBC was updated by maintaining its strengths, addressing its limitations, and incorporating recent research developments.

http://www.psp.pitt.edu/pdfs/TBC.pdf
Address all correspon-dence to Dr Alrwaily at: mza7@pitt.edu. M. Timko, PT, MS, FAAOMPT, Department of Physical Therapy, School of Health and Rehabilita-. The treatment-based classification (TBC) system for the treatment of patients with low back. tion Sciences, University of Pitts-. pain (LBP) has been in use by clinicians since 1995.

https://www.physio-pedia.com/Low_Back_Pain
The most common form of low back pain is the one that is called "non-specific low back pain" and is defined as "low back pain not attributed to recognizable, known specific pathology" [3]. Low back pain is usually categorized in 3 subtypes: acute, sub-acute and chronic low back pain. This subdivision is based on the duration of the back

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V1J0FWXcigk
In this video, we introduce the Low Back Pain (LBP) Classification System, and briefly discuss clinical presentations and some (but not all) treatments for e

https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3743645/
Introduction. Health professionals across such disciplines as orthopedics, physical therapy, and chiropractic have shared the goal of categorizing patients with musculoskeletal low back pain (LBP) according to evidence-based classification systems. 1, 2 To this end, several investigators have generated classification systems for LBP diagnosis and treatment. 3 - 8 Identifying specific

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9344960/
Treatment-Based Classification Group (n = 74): Received over a period of 4 weeks, directional preference exercises, spinal manipulation or stabilization exercises according to their classification. Physiotherapy (n = 82): Individualized physiotherapy according to Dutch clinical guidelines for low back pain.

https://www.painphysicianjournal.com/current/pdf?article=MjMyNQ%3D%3D&journal=88
Background: Low back pain (LBP) is a heterogeneous disorder including patients with dominant nociceptive (e.g., myofascial low back pain), neuropathic (e.g., ... Conclusion: The pain classification system for LBP should be an addition to available classification systems and diagnostic procedures for LBP, as it is focussed on pain

https://www.physio-pedia.com/Treatment-based_Classification_System_for_Low_Back_Pain
The TBC system for low back pain is a model designed to help clinicians make treatment decisions based on a patient's clinical presentation. [3] The primary purpose of the TBC is to identify features at baseline that predict responsiveness to three different treatment strategies. This approach has been validated.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26637653/
The treatment-based classification (TBC) system for the treatment of patients with low back pain (LBP) has been in use by clinicians since 1995. This perspective article describes how the TBC was updated by maintaining its strengths, addressing its limitations, and incorporating recent research developments. The current update of the TBC has 2

https://bmcmusculoskeletdisord.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12891-017-1549-6
Background Clinical examination findings are used in primary care to give an initial diagnosis to patients with low back pain and related leg symptoms. The purpose of this study was to develop best evidence Clinical Diagnostic Rules (CDR] for the identification of the most common patho-anatomical disorders in the lumbar spine; i.e. intervertebral discs, sacroiliac joints, facet joints, bone

https://www.iasp-pain.org/resources/fact-sheets/low-back-pain/
Low back pain and the social determinants of health: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. Pain 2020;161(11):2476-2493. ... Systematic Review and Synthesis of Mechanism-based Classification Systems for Pain Experienced in the Musculoskeletal System. Clin J Pain 2020;36(10):793-812. Vlaeyen JWS, MaherCG, Wiech K,

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21952188/
Objective: To describe the various ways chronic low back pain (CLBP) is classified, to determine if the classification systems are reliable and to assess whether classification-specific interventions have been shown to be effective in treating CLBP. Summary of background data: A classification system by which individual patients with CLBP could

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26000680/
Background: Low back pain (LBP) is a heterogeneous disorder including patients with dominant nociceptive (e.g., myofascial low back pain), neuropathic (e.g., lumbar radiculopathy), and central sensitization pain. In order to select an effective and preferably also efficient treatment in daily clinical practice, LBP patients should be classified clinically as either predominantly nociceptive

https://www.physio-pedia.com/Stratified_Care_for_Low_Back_Pain
Diagnostic classification of non-specific low back pain. A new system integrating patho-anatomic and clinical categories. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, 19: 213-237, 2003; ↑ Tom Petersen. Non-specific Low Back Pain Classification and treatment. Lund University, 2003.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK572334/
This guideline applies to adults (≥ 18 years) with low back pain for < 6 weeks. The objective is to create an evidence-based guideline for the management of low back pain; identify persons at risk for chronic disability and intervene early; detect dangerous but uncommon lesions; utilize diagnostic tests efficiently; and initiate treatment and refer when appropriate.

https://bmcmusculoskeletdisord.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12891-016-1074-z
To tackle the global burden of low back pain (LBP) [], researchers in primary care have highlighted the identification of clinically relevant subgroups of LBP as the number one research priority [].Extensive work has been published on classification systems, where researchers and clinicians have attempted to subgroup LBP patients into homogeneous populations with similar characteristics, with

https://chiro.org/Low_Back_Pain/An_Evidence-based_Diagnostic_Classification.shtml
INTRODUCTION: While clinicians generally accept that musculoskeletal low back pain (LBP) can arise from specific tissues, it remains difficult to confirm specific sources. METHODS: Based on evidence supported by diagnostic utility studies, doctors of chiropractic functioning as members of a research clinic created a diagnostic classification system, corresponding exam and checklist based on

https://www.aans.org/patients/conditions-treatments/low-back-pain/
An estimated 75-85% of Americans experience some form of back pain during their life. Although low back pain can be quite debilitating and painful, in approximately 90% of cases, it is temporary and pain improves without surgery. However, 50% of patients who suffer from episodes of low back pain will have recurrent episodes within one year.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28499364/
Abstract. Background: Clinical examination findings are used in primary care to give an initial diagnosis to patients with low back pain and related leg symptoms. The purpose of this study was to develop best evidence Clinical Diagnostic Rules (CDR] for the identification of the most common patho-anatomical disorders in the lumbar spine; i.e

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19501026/
For VAS Pain Rating (0-10 scale), the odds ratios of a statistically and clinically significant pain reduction (2 points) for the classification group ranged from 30% to 60% higher than odds for the Comparison Group (p<.05). The comparison group had the highest number of treatment days, statistically significantly greater than for each pattern

https://quizlet.com/512804967/classification-of-low-back-pain-flash-cards/
5 variables that are reliable predictors of patients in the manipulation classification -Duration of symptoms <16 days -No symptoms distal to the thigh -FABQ-W <19 -Atleast one hip with IR range >35 degrees -Hypomobility of lumbar spine assessed via CPAs 95% chance of success if 4/5 variables are met.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2219658/
Various health professionals have attempted to classify low back pain (LBP) subgroups and have developed several LBP classification systems. Knowing that culture has an effect on LBP symptomatology, assessment findings and clinical decision making, the aim of this review is to perform a cross-country comparative review amongst the published classification systems, addressing each country's

https://www.bmj.com/content/385/bmj-2024-080064
Low back pain is the world's leading cause of disability.1 At any time, half a billion (9%) adults are affected.1 Many are prescribed, or use, analgesics for pain relief.2 In this article, we review what is known about common analgesics for treating non-specific low back pain (defined as pain without an identifiable structural or disease cause). We focus on adults aged 18-60 years.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27215590/
Abstract. Background: The identification of clinically relevant subgroups of low back pain (LBP) is considered the number one LBP research priority in primary care. One subgroup of LBP patients are those with back related leg pain. Leg pain frequently accompanies LBP and is associated with increased levels of disability and higher health costs