https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P1BkURZb5jY
Have you ever heard that Lomography 800 is a film stock called Kodak Gold 800? And that this mystical film stock is only available through them at the Kodak

https://www.learnfilm.photography/is-lomo-800-just-rebranded-portra-800-a-side-by-side-comparison/
In a side-by-side comparison between Kodak Portra 800 and Lomo 800, I couldn't find any discernable difference between these two film stocks other than the thickness of the film base. After doing this test, and rescanning the film, Lomography 800 film appears to be re-branded Kodak Portra 800. But that's a pretty bold claim.

https://gridfiti.com/lomo-800-vs-portra-800/
In a world of rising film stock prices, Lomography shines a glimmer of hope as an affordable alternative to Kodak's pricey Portra 800 film. Lomography (or Lomo) 800 is fairly more saturated than Portra 800, with noticeably more contrast to its photos. Shadows and edges appear darker, and as a result, sharper.

https://www.culturedkiwi.com/kodak-portra-800-review/
Comparing Kodak Portra 800 to Other Color Films. Before buying any film, sizing them up against the competition is a must. Let's see how Portra 800 stacks up against one in the same range, plus a bitter rival with similar specs. Kodak Portra 800 vs. Portra 400: A Head-to-Head Comparison. The Kodak Portra line has three options that are all

https://lenslurker.com/kodak-portra-800/
The reason that a lot of people avoid buying Portra 800 is a simple one - it's expensive AF. At roughly $20 per roll of Portra 800 35mm, it wins the title of most expensive color-negative film available. Same goes for Portra 800 120 - around $75 for a five pack is a full $10 more than it costs for Portra 400.

https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/compare/Kodak_Portra_800_vs_Kodak_FunSaver/BHitems/197191-USA_368243-USA
Compare Kodak Portra 800 vs Kodak FunSaver | B&H Photo ... Comparing Kodak Portra 800 vs Kodak FunSaver . Print Email . Kodak Professional Portra 800 Color Negative Film (35mm Roll Film, 36 Exposures) You Pay: $17.95 (169) Add to Cart View Cart. Add to Wish List Item in Wish List .

https://www.analog.cafe/r/all-the-iso-800-colour-films-compared-b5eu
Once again, our test subjects were Kodak Portra 800, Kodak FunSaver 800, Lomography Color Negative 800, and Flic Film Aurora 800. Fujifilm 400 is our control. We used this film to identify the amount of change to expect from an emulsion that is for sure not another ISO 800 colour film stock. We used the same exposure settings for this film as

https://filmroadtrip.com/2021/11/06/film-photography-at-night-kodak-portra-800-and-lomography-metropolis/
Digital: Lomography Metropolis at ISO 200: One last comparison is the same scene which I shot from the Empire State Building on both Metropolis and Portra 800 so you can see the two films side-by-side. There is really no contest. Portra 800 is definitely superior in capturing the scene. Lomography Metropolis at ISO 800:

https://jakehornphotography.com/blog/portra800
Portra 800 Shot @ Exposure Index 500 (+2/3 stop) Now for the second rose shot, this time at exposure index 500. Two items are noticed right away, the difference in colors and the reduction in grain. The rose has now taken on a slightly darker hue becoming more saturated, which most people have reported when viewing over exposed film.

https://www.dpreview.com/articles/8852193252/film-fridays-kodak-portra-800-review
That's a good thing, because Portra 800 is capable of producing lovely results in all sorts of lighting conditions and even holds up well to being under or overexposed. Our friends over at 35mmc have a detailed review of this film stock (which is also a DPR staff favorite). It's chock full of sample photos.

https://www.analog.cafe/r/kodak-portra-800-film-review-pvm3
Kodak Portra 800 is the most accurate high-speed colour negative film made new today. It's not cheap, but if you want low-light sensitivity and realistic yet unmistakably analogue images out of your camera, this is the best option. Expect medium to chunky grain, natural contrast, and excellent responsiveness to colour and exposure corrections

https://www.35mmc.com/03/06/2019/kodak-portra-800-review/
Kodak Portra 800 is quite possibly my favourite colour negative film. I say that as someone who's just committed to shooting only P3200 and Ektachrome E100 for at least 6 months in a bid to learn these two returned-to-market films from Kodak properly. But when making that decision, the first concern I had was how I was going to cope without my quite-recently found love for this fast and very

https://www.35mmc.com/28/08/2019/kodak-portra-800-my-latest-crush-in-film-photography-by-aukje/
The big question of course is if Portra 800 is worth the extra cost. Of course that is personal, but to me it is. I will still keep shooting Portra 400 and Ektar. I like the slightly more subtle rendering of Portra 400 in bright light. And I prefer Ektar when the light is more bland, the higher saturation of Ektar can bring something extra.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B17raPV7zjk
Ill be doing another comparison with actual models so we can see the difference in skin tones and such for portraits and fashion work. For this one, i just w

https://fujixweekly.com/2024/02/15/comparing-kodak-portra-800-recipes/
Kodak Portra 800 v3 is the most warm of these four options; a comparison of warmer Recipes— 1970's Summer, 1971 Kodak, Vibrant Arizona, Kodak Vericolor Warm, Kodak Portra 400 Warm, Bright Summer, Bright Kodak, and the new Kodak Portra 800 v3—would be interesting. The original Kodak Portra 800 Recipe is the punchiest, Kodak Portra 800 v2

https://www.photrio.com/forum/threads/portra-800-vs-lomo-800-120-film.202420/
I'd buy Lomo CN 800 when Portra 800 wasn't available (or way more expensive) and never thought I was missing anything. Now, in 135 format, Lomo CN 800 is priced the same as Portra 800 and Portra 800 is in stock. A steady supply of 120 Lomo CN 800 at that new price would make me start looking for a MF camera again

https://gridfiti.com/kodak-portra-160-vs-400-vs-800/
Kodak Portra 400 is at the midpoint between Portra 160 and 800, and is hugely popular among professional and novice film photographers alike. The 400 speed allows you to shoot at higher shutter speeds, making it perfect for shoots with lots of movement - from nature, to travel, fashion, and more. The exposure latitude is more pronounced in

https://www.learnfilm.photography/portra-400-vs-lomo-400-side-by-side-is-portra-worth-the-money/
The Kodak Portra 400 performed better than the Lomo 400, producing cleaner images that were overall brighter with the same exposure settings. The Portra 400 images also appeared more neutral than the Lomo 400, which had a strong orange/yellow appearance over the entire image. At night, Kodak Portra is the clear winner.

https://www.reddit.com/r/analog/comments/19cmu39/is_lomo_800_the_same_as_portra_800/
I have heard that Lomography CN 800 is repackaged Kodak film. I have also come across people on the internet claiming Portra and Lomo 800 are identical, and others talk about their different color and contrast characteristics. I am completely new to film photography so I have no prior experience.

https://livability.com/mo/st-joseph/experiences-adventures/10-things-you-didnt-know-about-st-joseph-missouri/
Courtesy of St. Joseph Chamber of Commerce. Jesse James home in St. Joseph, MO. 2. The city is home to 14 museums. 3. It's the birthplace of rapper Eminem and TV news anchor Walter Cronkite. 4. You can stay in a Harry Potter themed bed and breakfast (among others). 5.

https://livability.com/mo/st-joseph/experiences-adventures/12-fun-things-to-do-in-st-joseph-missouri/
3. Ride the River Bluff Trails. One of St. Joe's newest and most exciting civic improvement projects is the River Bluff Trails Park, a network of multi-use and singletrack trails that run through the natural topography of the bluffs along the Missouri River. Attracting mountain biking enthusiasts from far and wide, the trails are being

https://shebuystravel.com/things-to-do-in-saint-joseph-missouri/
Top attractions in Saint Joseph, Missouri, include historic sites, hiking and biking trails, a casino, and the summer training camp for the Kansas City Chiefs. St. Jo was founded in 1843 at the site of a fur-trading post. By the end of the century, it was one of the richest towns in America. Today, Saint Joseph's Gilded Age of the 1880s and

https://www.travelawaits.com/2493649/saint-joseph-missouri-reasons-to-visit/
3. It's Got Great Public Art. From traditional classical art to large-scale murals covering the sides of downtown buildings, Saint Joseph boasts a vibrant art scene. The Albrecht-Kemper Museum of Art features oil paintings from the 18th century as well as contemporary art. The museum also hosts special exhibits.