https://yourphotographybuddy.com/kodak-colorplus-vs-kodak-gold-which-is-the-best/
One Is Warmer Than The Other. One of the key differences between Kodak Colorplus and Kodak Gold 200 is the hue. Kodak Colorplus has a slightly warm hue whereas Gold has quite a noticeable warm/yellow hue. The difference in hue is quite noticeable in the pictures above. Kodak Gold has a bright golden feel to it, whereas Colorplus has a more

https://fotoprofy.com/kodak-gold-vs-colorplus/
With ColorPlus 200 and Gold 200, you'll have plenty of options for capturing amazing photos. So don't be afraid to experiment and discover the perfect film for your needs! Is Kodak Gold 200 good for beginners? Kodak Gold 200 is a good choice for beginners. It has an ISO of 200, so it's an ideal film speed to capture everyday scenes.

https://www.analog.cafe/r/kodak-gold-vs-colorplus-5tml
Kodak Gold vs. ColorPlus: differences between the physical negatives. One last thing left to examine was the difference between the physical, developed negatives. Again, there was none other than the markings in the margins: Kodak Gold had KODAK GB 200-7 vs. Kodak ColorPlus' KODAK 200-8. As far as I can tell, both emulsions had the same

https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/compare/Kodak_Gold+200_vs_Kodak_ColorPlus/BHitems/27712-USA_1476366-REG
Comparing Kodak Gold 200 vs Kodak ColorPlus . Print Email. Close. We use cookies to improve your web browsing experience, enhance site security, and for marketing and promotional purposes. Cookies allow us to do things like remember your preferences and provide improved search results.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDZ7wxJqJn8
Kodak Color Plus or Kodak Gold 200, what's your favorite one? 👀If you have any questions, please leave them in the comments. I'll be happy to answer! 🎞📷🥤

https://www.reddit.com/r/AnalogCommunity/comments/18kf5l4/kodak_colorplus_200_vs_kodak_gold_200_vs_fujifilm/
Looking at the images, If you pixel peep, Kodak Gold 200 and Fujifilm 200 are basically the same with very slight (perhaps marginal) differences. These 2 films when compared to Colorplus 200, appear sharper, more contrasty/vibrant, and lean a bit more orange with more intense blues and less grain. Kodak ColorPlus does seem to lack sharpness

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ceiN74e6dKw
Difference between both most favoured Kodak films for easy reference.pictures not taken by me.original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O6VJZqfFHdM

https://www.reddit.com/r/AnalogCommunity/comments/w70edo/kodak_gold_vs_colorplus/
Color Plus is great for daylight but doesn't have the same under and overexposure latitude. Use Color Plus for general daytime work and Gold as a film for almost everything. It even works great at night and indoor if you use a fast lens and a good scanning method. 3. SmoothPeak.

https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/compare/Kodak_ColorPlus_vs_Kodak_Gold_200/BHitems/1476366-REG_1697071-REG
Comparing Kodak ColorPlus vs Kodak Gold 200 . Print Email . Kodak ColorPlus 200 Color Negative Film (35mm Roll Film, 36 Exposures) You Pay: $8.49 (75) Add to Cart View Cart. Add to Wish List Item in Wish List . Kodak Professional Gold 200 Color Negative Film (120 Roll Film, 5-Pack) Price: $44.95. Instant Savings-29%.

https://witandfolly.co/kodak-colorplus-200-review/
What's nice about Kodak ColorPlus 200 is that it has a more balanced color profile and isn't as saturated as Kodak Gold 200, the other popular 200 speed Kodak film stock. Kodak ColorPlus 200 performs best slightly exposed and loves bright light. In good sunlight, the film stock does a very nice job of accentuating the warm tones in the

https://lenslurker.com/kodak-colorplus-200/
Colorplus 200 is arguably the oldest color film offered by Kodak, descending from a line of films called "Kodacolor" that was released in the 1970s. Kodacolor was offered in a variety of sizes and film speeds. One particular version from the 1980s called "Kodacolor VR 200" would later be repackaged and sold as Kodak ColorPlus 200.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AmXGRHQyjZQ
Which do you prefer? #filmphotography #thedarkroomlab #film #35mm

https://casualphotophile.com/2021/06/23/kodak-colorplus-200/
The latest packaging of ColorPlus, with its simple yellow and red packaging faithful to Kodak's brand image, immediately brings to mind punchy contrast and vivid tones. Rated at 200 ISO, this film is destined to be shot in sunny, outdoor situations, or in very well-lit environments. But its versatility is quite impressive.

https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/310018-kodak-colorplus-200-vs-gold-200/
It's smaller grain than the rest, and most importantly gives good/pleasing skintones, also a bit less saturated and contrasty than Gold/Colourplus. Essentially it's like a cheap version of Portra, usually sold to wedding photographers on a smaller budget. Around £5-6/roll, but prices can vary as always.

https://www.analog.cafe/r/kodak-colorplus-200-film-review-fygr
View this image in HD with GOLD. Kodak ColorPlus is a relatively affordable 35mm ISO 200 colour film sold primarily in the US and Asian markets. Though you could still get it in Canada (where I live), it's not meant for distribution here. And it's easy to understand why Kodak may be limiting this film's customer reach: ColorPlus is nearly

https://www.reddit.com/r/AnalogCommunity/comments/g5n6fr/gold_200_v_colorplus_200_v_ultramax_400_v/
If you're looking for something that might sit in a camera for a long time and/or be exposed to heat or humidity then ProImage might be what you're looking for. The only slight negative with ProImage is that it'll be roughly as grainy as the other 200/400 speed films you listed despite only being ASA 100. 3. Award.

https://www.photrio.com/forum/threads/personal-experience-gold-200-or-colorplus-200.159470/
Kodacolor Gold 200 (GB) 1988 Kodak Gold 200 (GB) 1997 Kodak Gold 200 (GB) 2007 (current V7) Kodacolor VR 200 from '86 was re-introduced in 1990 as 'Kodacolor 200' a lower cost alternative to the new Gold films in selected markets inc Europe but not USA. It was later rebranded as 'Kodak ColorPlus 200'.(It is claimed this was an improved version) .

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lYTUAfjNYxo
This video shows you the comparison result of the Kodak film camera series, between Kodak Colorplus 200 and Kodak Gold 200.Video: Sony A6000Film Camera: Koda

http://vieilalbum.com/1APocketKodakUS.htm
Produced from 1926 to 1931, the N°1A Pocket Kodak has a very recognizable design. The "Kodak" logo that is engraved on the fold-up stand as well as the chiselling of the Autographic pen (located on the side of the shutter), both are clearly inspired by the "Art Déco" period. This camera is equipped with a Kodex N°1 shutter (T, B, 1/25s et 1

https://www.reddit.com/r/analog/comments/pxl3pl/kodak_ultramax_400_vs_gold_200_vs_colorplus_200/
Exposure isn't difficult so don't be afraid of trying to work it out. The aperture controls how much light the lens lets through (higher numbers mean a smaller aperture, which means less light. F1.4 is brighter than f8). the shutter speed controls how much light the shutter lets through (higher numbers are faster (1000= 1/1000th of a second).

https://www.facebook.com/lostillinoismanufacturing/posts/eastman-kodak-companyin-1962-the-eastman-kodak-company-employed-1000-people-in-c/878610712253805/
Eastman Kodak Company. In 1962 the Eastman Kodak Company employed 1,000 people in Chicago with the principle film developing center located at 1727 South Indiana Avenue and in 1962 moved the MidWest Office to Oak Brook while retaining film processing at Chicago. As late as 1976, Kodak commanded 90% of film sales and 85% of camera sales in the U

https://www.reddit.com/r/analog/comments/gjfdz1/konica_a4kodak_cp200chicago_il/
View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit Konica A4/Kodak CP200/Chicago, IL

https://www.reddit.com/r/analog/comments/1858jiq/chicago_il_olympus_infinity_stylus_kodak_gold_200/
2.1M subscribers in the analog community. Film photography subreddit. Ask anything about analog photography in our weekly "ask anything" thread, or