https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oojYbipoPY0
To try everything Brilliant has to offer—free—for a full 30 days, visit https://brilliant.org/TheCherno. The first 200 of you will get 20% off Brilliant's an

https://www.gamesinprogress.com/indie-game-developers/the-cherno/i-had-to-fix-this-immediately-code-review
I HAD to fix this immediately // Code Review - Follow the latest game devlog of The Cherno.

https://mtlynch.io/human-code-reviews-2/
Bob began his review by asking Mallory to create new changelists, splitting off two small libraries that we had never really fought about, each about 30-50 lines. Once Mallory did that, Bob instantly approved them. Then, Bob came back to the main changelist, which was trimmed down to about 200 lines of code.

https://medium.com/panaseer-labs-engineering-data-science/the-downward-spiral-of-slow-code-reviews-and-how-to-fix-it-778a0313313
That's the short story of not prioritising code reviews. At the core of this is the belief that a task at the In Review stage on your Jira board is a finished task.

https://medium.com/promyze/7-frustrations-to-avoid-with-code-review-best-practices-60badc1ba08d
Frustration 2: Bikeshedding and debating about standards. Sara reads the review comments made earlier by Sofia. One is about a coding style that "doesn't change the behavior, but I prefer like

https://quickbirdstudios.com/blog/code-review-best-practices-guidelines/
2. 😰 Fear of Showing Weakness. The opposite effect can occur as well. We notice something weird or don't really understand what the code does, but we neglect to mention it out of fear. After all, if we ask a question in a merge request, it might be interpreted as a weakness.

https://betterprogramming.pub/7-ways-to-dramatically-reduce-your-time-in-code-review-febe05e9f38c
Conclusion: Best Practices for Speeding Up Code Reviews. To recap, here are seven tips for dramatically reducing your time in code review: Keep pull requests small. Use pull request templates to provide all the context a reviewer would need. Implement response time SLAs.

https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/338219/what-to-do-when-code-submitted-for-code-review-appears-to-be-too-complicated
Both always submitted code that had no bugs. One submitted code that I could read from top and bottom at high speed and mark as 100% correct with zero effort. The other submitted code that was one WTF after the other, but somehow managed to avoid any bugs. An absolute pain to mark. Today the second one would have his code rejected in a code review.

https://mixandgo.com/blog/the-problem-with-code-reviews-and-how-to-fix-it
Fix your code review process. I want to share with you two ideas on how to improve your code review process and ultimately provide the learning aid that code reviews are great for. There are at least two things you can do. Plan ahead. Before any coding begins, you can do a design review meeting where you can put at least one senior developer in

https://betterprogramming.pub/the-dos-and-don-ts-of-code-reviews-77032ba3a30c
Reduce team friction by having healthier code review cultures. Code reviews are an essential part of the development process. They help to maintain code integrity, quality, styling, prevent bugs, and even help us learn from others. The big barrier with code reviews is that they are usually done in an impersonal matter — such as leaving

https://understandlegacycode.com/blog/what-you-can-do-when-code-is-hard-to-review/
4. Ask for smaller changes. A common clue for difficult code reviews is when the diff is more than 500 LOC, yet the description is as tiny as " Implement cancellations ". In such a case, ask the change to be broken down into smaller chunks. A series of small, self-contained changes is less risky.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Frontend/comments/quk6v2/experienced_devs_how_to_handle_code_review/
ADMIN MOD. Experienced Devs: How to handle code review pushback and non-compliant devs. Context: I got a job recently and was asked to embed with another in-house team for a few weeks until my team came back from vacation/parental leave. There isn't another dedicated frontend engineer on this team but several generalist engineers with limited

https://www.freecodecamp.org/news/what-google-taught-me-about-code-reviews/
A code review, sometimes called code Quality Assurance, is the practice of having other people check your code after you write it. Code reviews bring many benefits to the process of writing and delivering software: Ensures consistency through your codebase. Teaches all members of the review (helps knowledge transfer).

https://davidgiard.com/what-are-code-reviews-why-should-we-spend-time-on-them-and-how-can-we-improve-them
The Code Reviewer retrieves the code, examines it, and (if necessary) provides feedback on changes that the author must make before the code can be merged with the main branch. If the code requires changes, the Reviewer sends the feedback to the Author. The Author responds to the feedback and makes any necessary changes.

https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/380434/agile-practices-code-review-fail-the-review-or-raise-an-issue
That's not the way it works. Testing will find errors and code review will find things to change. If it wouldn't, it would be a big waste of time. So to sum it up: yes, the DoD is binary. Pass or Fail. A code review is not binary, it should be more like an ongoing task. You cannot fail. It's a process and in the end it's done.

https://www.reddit.com/r/devops/comments/w5y7uc/to_make_code_review_better_shouldnt_we_have_a/
Code reviewers review several artifacts such as checking that the code adheres to the coding standards, a review unit/functional test results, and any static and dynamic analysis results. Nowadays most of this can be automated via the CI/CD system and the real review can concentrate on how well the design has been implemented and if the code is

https://www.codegrip.tech/productivity/common-code-review-mistakes/
With that said, one way to spot mistakes in the code produced and to improve the quality of the same is through the means of code review. Code review can be understood as a systematic process of evaluating and checking the code produced at the development stage. This analysis of the code is an ideal way for the written code to be seen by four

https://medium.com/@KieranJones/what-i-learned-from-failing-my-first-code-review-c66075eb5926
The main goal of a code review is to make sure the code that makes it into production is high quality, bug free and actually does what it's supposed to so that the end users of your product have

https://www.reddit.com/r/softwaredevelopment/comments/hop43u/frustrated_with_code_reviews/
eddyparkinson. • • Edited. > Code reviews drag on for days. 1 hour per A4 sheet of printed code/requirements is a good guide. ROI - aim to maximise your ROI - i.e. issues/bugs found per hour. 3 mins per bug - set a time limit of 3 mins discussion per issue/bug. - you kill your ROI if you spend a long time on each bug.

https://www.codemzy.com/blog/how-to-fix-code-not-working
Some of these tips are specific to JavaScript, but most will apply to any language. 🤷‍♀️ Check if your code is actually broken. 👀 Go through the code line-by-line. 👩‍💻 console.log() it. 📖 Check the docs. 🔎 Use a search engine. 😴 Take a break. 1. Check if your code is actually broken.

https://www.yelp.com/biz/hotwire-refrigeration-and-appliance-repair-seattle
120 reviews and 9 photos of HOTWIRE REFRIGERATION & APPLIANCE REPAIR "My LG refrigerator broke on Thursday night. I contacted several places through yelp on Friday. This was the only one that said they could fix it the same day, so I asked them to come. They told me that the compressor was broken and needed to be replaced. It would take about 1.5 hours but they had another appointment, so they

https://www.reddit.com/r/ExperiencedDevs/comments/ze31zn/i_stopped_caring_about_code_quality_during_code/
I've been on teams with and without linting. The teams with linting generally had better quality code, subjectively and objectively. It's an executable code standards document (although not all standards are enforceable with linting). The best kind of documentation is executable documentation as it won't rot. Even on solo projects I have linting.

https://www.yelp.com/biz/sonoma-zipline-adventures-occidental
1070 reviews and 906 photos of SONOMA ZIPLINE ADVENTURES "I can safely say I never thought I'd be hanging out in the top of a redwood forest, but that's exactly what I did this past weekend. And I lived to tell about it! :-D Even though the company just opened on June 26th, Sonoma Canopy Tours has its stuff together. The employees were knowledgeable not only on the ways of the zipline, but

https://news.sky.com/story/election-2024-sunak-starmer-conservatives-labour-reform-lib-dem-12593360
Rishi Sunak and Sir Keir Starmer are both set to attend a banquet as part of a state visit by the emperor of Japan. Meanwhile, Ruth Davidson has called for the prime minister to ignore the

https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/19/tech/car-dealership-cdk-cyber-incident-outage/index.html
A second cyber incident at data provider CDK Global, whose software is used at 15,000 auto dealers, continued to slow operations to a near-standstill Thursday at US and Canada dealerships, the

https://www.reddit.com/r/learnprogramming/comments/x9z4r2/is_code_reviewing_just_reading_the_code_or/
Code review is reading. The type of errors you catch in code review are logical errors that might not be readily apparent in running/testing. The type of stuff that affects maintainability and/or performance. It can help ensure that the code is consistent with the organization's standards and follows best practices.

https://www.ign.com/articles/elden-ring-shadow-of-the-erdtree-dlc-review
Try to guess the video game: In the input field, type a question that could be answered "yes" or "no". You can ask up to 20 questions before the game is over.

https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/arx96h/i_ruin_developers_lives_with_my_code_reviews_and/
Talking out solutions and brainstorming designs makes 90% of code review comments useless. Of course, on larger teams there's still the chance that someone on he broader team will still not agree with the design choices 2 people decide on. But, at least some really obvious bad design choices can be avoided.