https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v4NhOtIv8UY
Anti-Paulism is a common heresy among liberal protestants, but the Bible debunks this heresy long before liberal protestantism was invented. False teachers l

https://noqreport.com/2020/05/19/anti-paulism-debunked-by-scripture/
See all the latest videos and articles patriots need to watch and read at Discern.tv. Anti-Paulism is a common heresy among liberal protestants, but the Bible debunks this heresy long before liberal protestantism was invented. False teachers like Jory Micah and John Pavlovitz are a couple major false teachers who promote this viewpoint.

https://evangelicaldarkweb.org/2020/01/08/2-peter-3-debunks-anti-paulism/
Anti-Paulism is a heresy that denies the God-breathed words of Paul's Epistles in the New Testament. False teachers like Jory Micah frequently deny the authority of scripture due to their Anti-Paulism, as does John Pavlovitz. Rejecting Paul enables you to form your own theology and reshape Jesus in your image. 2 Peter 3:14-18:

https://christianity.stackexchange.com/questions/9653/scholarly-discussion-of-claims-that-paul-is-a-false-apostle
Ebionites (possibly the first Christians) believed him to be a false apostle. These men (Ebionites), moreover, thought that it was necessary to reject all the epistles of the apostle [Paul], whom they called an apostate from the law. — Eusebius 325 AD. Some significant early church fathers had issues with Paul.

https://www.gotquestions.org/Pauline-Christianity.html
Any time a skeptic finds a "disagreeable" doctrine in the Bible, he is likely to say, "That passage has been corrupted," or, "Paul wrote that, and we know he was a liar." Where the Gospels teach a "Pauline" doctrine, such as Jesus' atonement for sin in John 1:29, the skeptic dismisses it as "inserted by devotees of Paul."

https://christianity.stackexchange.com/questions/4743/what-are-the-biblical-arguments-against-the-papacy-and-papal-succession
Sola Scriptura is supported by 2 Timothy 3:16, 2 Cor. 2:13, Romans 3:2 (among others), which shows that the Bible was divinely inspired. Because of this, we can trust the Bible to be the absolute truth (above all human knowledge). Side note: Martin Luther wrote a simple layman armed with Scripture is greater than the mightiest pope without it

https://davidwilber.com/articles/peters-warning-about-the-antinomians-who-misinterpret-pauls-letters
The word "Scripture" (γραφή) is used fifty times in the New Testament, and it "always refers to the authoritative writings that we call the Old Testament." From Peter's perspective, Paul's teaching aligns with that of the Law and Prophets, all falling under the category of "Scripture." In other words, Paul's letters do

https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/reviews/didache-missing-piece-puzzle-early-christianity/
He is certainly correct. This comprehensive collection of essays demonstrates how the Didache needs to be placed front and center in discussions of Jewish-Christianity, the Matthean Gospel community, anti-Paulinism, and a host of other topics. Tony Burke is Associate Professor in the Department of Humanities at York University in Toronto, Canada.

https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/article/answering-objections-to-presuppositionalism/
Answering Objections to Presuppositionalism. The Bible calls Christians to always be prepared to give an answer to those who ask for the reason of the hope within us (1 Peter 3:15). And so, from the very beginning of church history, Christians have publicly and privately labored to show the reasonableness of our faith against the objections of

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pauline_Christianity
Artist depiction of Saint Paul Writing His Epistles, 16th century (Blaffer Foundation Collection, Houston, Texas).Most scholars think Paul actually dictated his letters to a secretary. Pauline Christianity or Pauline theology (also Paulism or Paulanity), otherwise referred to as Gentile Christianity, is the theology and form of Christianity which developed from the beliefs and doctrines

https://www.patheos.com/blogs/faithfulprogress/2021/01/an-inclusive-interpretation-of-biblical-clobber-passages/
[1] The Scripture is clear that Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed because of their pride which led them to be selfish and inhospitable, rather than aiding the poor and the needy in their midst. [2

https://www.semperreformanda.com/theology/bibliology/the-ninety-five-theses-against-dispensationalism/
95 THESES AGAINST DISPENSATIONALISM. 1. Contrary to the dispensationalists' claim that their system is the result of a "plain interpretation" (Charles Ryrie) of Scripture, it is a relatively new innovation in Church history, having emerged only around 1830, and was wholly unknown to Christian scholars for the first eighteen hundred years

https://www.logos.com/grow/paul-was-not-a-christian-the-original-message-of-a-misunderstood-apostle/
Book Review Pamela Eisenbaum, HarperSanFrancisco, 2009, 336 pp. The new perspective on Paul which has completely reoriented Pauline studies over the last thirty years continues not only to inspire new theses, but to highlight still unresolved issues as well. Though arguably the majority of New Testament scholars now embrace E.P. Sanders' principal observation that Palestinian […]

https://ensignmessage.com/articles/an-examination-of-anti-paulism/
AN EXAMINATION OF ANTI-PAULISM. By Destiny Publishers. THERE is a movement on foot to discredit the writings of the Apostle Paul in the Bible, declaring they are a perversion of the truth. The conclusion is that Paul's Epistles should be expunged from the New Testament.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/45681348_Matthew's_anti-Paulinism_A_neglected_feature_of_Matthean_studies
MATTHEW AS AN ANTI-PAULINE TEXT. The thes is that Mat thew was an anti-Pau line tex t was propos ed in 1951 by S G F Brandon, 4. who produced three argume nts in suppor t of his case. Fir st

https://faithfoundedonfact.com/irrefutable-contradictions-in-the-bible/
"The Bible is an anvil that has worn out many hammers"-unknown author. Let's begin debunking false claims of Bible Contradictions by looking at the very first "Bible contradictions" on these copied lists mentioned above. We'll cover the first 10 contradictions on their list.

https://www.catholic.com/magazine/print-edition/a-quick-ten-step-refutation-of-sola-scriptura
1. Sola Scriptura Is Not Taught in the Bible. Catholics agree with Protestants that Scripture is a "standard of truth"—even the preeminent one—but not in a sense that rules out the binding authority of authentic apostolic Tradition and the Church. The Bible doesn't teach that. Catholics agree that Scripture is materially sufficient.

https://www.cairn-int.info/article-E_RSR_023_0399--christian-anti-paulism-in-the-2nd.htm
Christian Anti-Paulism in the 2nd Century. Following the present tendencies of exegesis, and more sensitive than before to the Wirkungsgeschichte of biblical texts, this article asks what has become of the figure of Paul and his work starting at the end of the 1 st century. Pointing out that little was said of the apostle and his works in the 2

https://aeon.co/ideas/the-gospels-of-paul-dont-say-what-you-think-they-say
For Paul, these are two antithetical principles of creaturely existence, though most translations misrepresent the antithesis as a mere contrast between God's 'spirit' and human perversity. But Paul is quite explicit: 'Flesh and blood cannot inherit the Kingdom.'. Neither can psychē, 'soul', the life-principle or anima that gives

https://campuspress.yale.edu/keithderose/1129-2/
Contrary to what many would suppose, universalism, understood as above, receives strong scriptural support in the New Testament. Indeed, I judge the support strong enough that if I had to choose between universalism and anti-universalism as the "position of Scripture," I'd pick universalism as the fairly clear winner. But more on that later.

https://berkleycenter.georgetown.edu/posts/national-populism-and-christian-symbolism-a-conversation-with-tobias-cremer
National populist movements on both sides of the Atlantic—such as the presidency of Donald Trump and the Front National of Marine Le Pen—invoke Christianity in a myriad of ways, from incorporating Christian symbolism in political rallies to developing a rhetoric of defending the "Judeo-Christian" tradition.Some observers have considered the role of religion in right-wing populist movements

https://biologos.org/articles/5-common-arguments-against-the-bible-and-how-to-respond-to-them
The Bible holds an essential place in Christian faith. The Bible claims to be—and the Church has recognized it as—the Word of God. The Church through the ages has acknowledged this status by referring to the Bible as its canon, which means that the Bible is the written standard for its faith and practice.

https://www.ps127.org/single-post/heresy-101-anti-paulism
Anti-Paulism or Pauline Christianity is the belief that the Apostle Paul was a heretic and that the books he wrote are not a part of Biblica. top of page. The House of Faith Church. Log In. A Bible Founded, Christ-Centered Community of Believers Desiring a Deeper, More Meaningful Relationship with God ... Heaven & Hell Destinations in the Bible

https://www.reddit.com/r/islam/comments/yg499p/why_do_christians_believe_mohammad_was_a_false/
If you accept Paulism to be true - because that's what "christanity" essentially is, then you have hope that your sect's translation of the Bible was the true one, and some how, throw all logic out of the window and accept that you're basically a polytheist. That leaves Islam