https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transcendental_argument_for_the_existence_of_God
The Transcendental Argument for the existence of God (TAG) is a transcendental argument that attempts to prove the existence of God, i. e. it attempts to prove the necessary conditions for the possibility of something (e. g. knowledge) contradict with the proposition that God does not exist.. A version was formulated by Immanuel Kant in his 1763 work The Only Possible Argument in Support of a

https://www.reddit.com/r/askphilosophy/comments/wh30bz/what_are_the_best_arguments_for_the_existence_of/
However, in terms of arguments which have rich history and thorough discussion by philosophers even still today, here are some of the most common: The Kalam Cosmological argument : Everything that begins to exist has a cause. The universe began to exist. Therefore, the universe has a cause.

https://www.americamagazine.org/content/all-things/god-and-science-qa-robert-spitzer-sj
Those who have an interest in philosophical proofs will want to read Lonergan's proof of God in Insight: A Study of Human Understanding Chapter 19 or Craig's and Sinclair's Hilbertian proof

https://phy.duke.edu/~rgb/Philosophy/axioms/axioms/node42.html
Why Descartes Proof of God's Existence is Bullshit. What follows is a dilettante's guide to the history of Enlightenment, stopping off here and there to visit some Famous Names or Results in the development of philosophy. Modern philosophy in the West went from a state of near-complete religious domination (where nearly the only philosophers

https://pintswithaquinas.com/the-best-argument-for-the-existence-of-god/
The Contingency Argument is probably the best proof of God's existence. When we consider the universe, there are three ways to explain its existence: It either has no explanation, it is its own explanation, or it needs to be explained by something else. The third option — the heart of the Contingency Argument — is the most plausible of

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalam_cosmological_argument
William Lane Craig (born 1949) who revived the Kalam during the 20th and 21st centuries. The Kalam cosmological argument is a modern formulation of the cosmological argument for the existence of God.It is named after the Kalam (medieval Islamic scholasticism), from which its key ideas originated.William Lane Craig was principally responsible for giving new life to the argument in the 20th

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ontological_argument
In Spinoza's Short Treatise on God, Man, and His Well-Being, he wrote a section titled "Treating of God and What Pertains to Him", in which he discusses God's existence and what God is. He starts off by saying: "whether there is a God, this, we say, can be proved". His proof for God follows a similar structure as Descartes' ontological argument.

https://www.wordonfire.org/videos/wordonfire-show/episode96/
Five Proofs of the Existence of God by Edward Feser; The Last Superstition: A Refutation of the New Atheism by Edward Feser; Aquinas: An Introduction to the Life and Work of the Great Medieval Thinker by F. C. Copleston; To Light a Fire on the Earth: Proclaiming Christ in a Secular Age by Bishop Barron

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10699-020-09677-x
The concept of God is studied using the ontological argument of Anselm of Canterbury that proves God's existence using a syllogism based on ontology. Unlike metaphysical arguments that demonstrate the existence of God through the study of being and its attributes, the ontological argument aims to reach this same goal based on a concept of God by means of the idea of an entity "greater than

https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/philosophy/article/abs/some-modern-proofs-of-the-existence-of-god/6E65473975A8ED02E997CC6D289FD0D8
Extract. Time was when the proofs of the existence of God formed an essential part of any self-respecting system of Philosophy. But for many years now this has ceased to be the case. It may be due to the gradual increase of the influence of Kant that the idea seems to have become accepted, tacitly, in the main, but none the less very widely

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-018-0190-9
These cognitive mechanisms are not truth-tracking with respect to the existence or non-existence of God. 6. Therefore, Susan's belief that there is a God is not justified.

https://bigthink.com/the-well/evidence-for-god/
God cannot be sought in an empirical or scientific way. Literature, philosophy, and religion are other ways that we can gain knowledge about reality and the human condition. There is no evidence

https://forumphilosophicum.ignatianum.edu.pl/docannexe/file/6328/1._vattanky.pdf
inferential reason, in a€proof to establish the existence of God. The full form of the proof must have been something like this: the different things in nature like grass, earth, shoots, etc., must have an agent, just as things like, e.g. pots have an agent, viz., a€potter. And the cause of effects like grass, earth, etc., is God.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1298980/
Common language talks about DNA as 'information' or 'a code'. For a very long time, scientists suspected that something—some kind of plan, specificity or driving force—resided within the sperm and/or egg, such that a snake developed from a snake egg and humans created human offspring. But it was only in the late 1940s and 1950s, when

https://www.wordonfire.org/articles/fellows/does-conscience-point-towards-the-existence-of-god/
The Catechism tells us that conscience is "a judgment of reason by which the human person recognizes the moral quality of a concrete act" ( 1796 ). It is a rational human faculty, agrees Newman, like memory, reason, and the sense of beauty; yet it also has a moral sovereignty over us. We often find ourselves going where we do not want to go

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existence_of_God
"God's existence and nonexistence are exactly equiprobable." Leaning towards atheism. Lower than 50% but not very low. "I do not know whether God exists but I'm inclined to be skeptical." ... Maimonides offered proofs for the existence of God, but he did not begin with defining God first, like many others do. Rather, he used the description of

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2007.00076.x
That this is the case is both puzzling and unfortunate. It is puzzling because although Spinoza does offer an ontological proof for the existence of God, he also offers three other non-ontological proofs. It is unfortunate because these other non-ontological proofs are both more convincing and more interesting than his ontological proof.

https://www2.snc.edu/files/publication/Documents/Why%20There%20Is%20No%20God%20Simple%20Responses%20To%2020%20Common%20Arguments%20For%20The%20Existence%20Of%20God.pdf
Five Proofs of the Existence of God Edward Feser,2017-08-25 This book provides a detailed, updated exposition and ... knowledge play in the debate over God's existence. Self-Contradictions of the Bible William Henry Burr,2011-11-12 A Book full of contradictions in the Bible, not just

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-9205.00170
Descartes' Cosmological and Ontological Proofs of God's Existence: A Refutation of Skepticism? Vijay Mascarenhas, Vijay Mascarenhas. Yale University, USA. Search for more papers by this author. Vijay Mascarenhas, Vijay Mascarenhas. Yale University, USA.

https://academic.oup.com/book/1828/chapter/141541164
Abstract. Large numbers of people have religious experiences in the sense of experiences which seem to them to be experiences of God. It is a basic epistemological principle, the principle of credulity, that — in absence of counter-evidence — we should believe that things are as they seem to be. The only kind of counter-evidence which would

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Only_Possible_Argument_in_Support_of_a_Demonstration_of_the_Existence_of_God
The Only Possible Argument in Support of a Demonstration of the Existence of God (German: Der einzig mögliche Beweisgrund zu einer Demonstration des Daseins Gottes) is a book by Immanuel Kant, published in 1763.It was published during the earlier period of Kant's philosophy, often referred to as the "pre-critical" period, during which he expressed little doubt about the possibility of

https://coldcasechristianity.com/writings/is-god-real-evidence-for-god-from-objective-moral-truth/
Transcendent, objective moral truths such as these form the foundation of the Axiological Argument for the existence of God. "Axio" means the "study of values" and the Axiological Argument uses the existence of objective values or "mores" to prove the existence of God: (1) There is an Objective (Transcendent) Moral Law.

https://rationalbelief.medium.com/i-have-provided-6-proofs-for-god-you-can-have-a-look-into-the-6th-one-if-interested-a0c1c8bdd93b
Mar 27, 2023--Listen. Share