Videos Web

Powered by NarviSearch ! :3

(Bruno v. County of Los Angeles) Deposition of Irma Salazar-Allen V1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kU4sXj504RA
This full volume deposition (Irma Salazar-Allen V1 - 3/1/2017 full volume) was part of the Bruno v. County of Los Angeles case. If there are any questions,

Ricardo Bruno et al v. County of Los Angeles 8:2017cv01301 | US

https://dockets.justia.com/docket/california/cacdce/8:2017cv01301/684998
Ricardo Bruno et al v. County of Los Angeles ... S HOSPITAL OF ORANGE COUNTY, Children's Hospital Orange County, County of Los Angeles, County of Orange, DOCTOR DOES 1 through 2, DOES, Deputy J. Lee, Detective Belen Lewis, Nurse Doe 1, Detective Maricruz Perez, Deputy Jason Schmoker, Social Worker Doe 1, Nicole Strattman and Laura Todd

Ricardo Bruno v. County of Los Angeles, 8:17-cv-01301 - CourtListener

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/7782813/ricardo-bruno-v-county-of-los-angeles/
1. Jul 27, 2017. NOTICE OF REMOVAL from ORANGE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER, case number 30-2017-00926447 Receipt No: 0973-20254093 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendants NICOLE STRATTMAN, County of Orange, a public entity, LAURA TODD. (Attachments: # 1 Complaint, # 2 Proof of Service - County of Los Angeles, # 3 Answer - CHOC, # 4

o,~~< o,A ~COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

https://file.lacounty.gov/SDSInter/bos/supdocs/136885.pdf
Ricardo Bruno, et al. v. County of Los Angeles, et al. United States District Court Case No. 8:17-CV-013Q1 TELEPHONE (213)974-1885 FACSIMILE (213) 626-2105 roD (213)633-0901 E-MAIL nbyersQQ counsel.lncounty,gov Attached is the Agenda entry for the Los Angeles County CIaims Board's recommendation regarding the above-referenced matter. Also attached

Ricardo Bruno et al v. County of Los Angeles (8:17-cv-01301

https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/22082436/Ricardo_Bruno_et_al_v_County_of_Los_Angeles
County of Los Angeles (8:17-cv-01301), California Central District Court. Ricardo Bruno et al v. County of Los Angeles. MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE ON STIPULATION TO DISMISS CASE by Judge Cormac J. Carney. The Court, having been advised by the Defendant that this action has been resolved by a Stipulation to

In re Bruno M. :: 2018 :: California Courts of Appeal Decisions

https://law.justia.com/cases/california/court-of-appeal/2018/b287537.html
B287537 LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 17CCJP00197A-B Plaintiff and Respondent, v. PEDRO M., Defendant and Appellant; BRUNO M. et al., Minors, etc., Objectors and Respondents. APPEAL from orders of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Robert S. Wada, Juvenile Court Referee.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA - cases.justia.com

https://cases.justia.com/california/supreme-court/2020-s250734.pdf?ts=1597078852
1 B.B. v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES S250734 Opinion of the Court by Chin, J. In this case, we consider the application of Civil Code section 1431.21 to tortfeasors held liable for injuries based on the commission of an intentional tort. Here, the intentional tort was a battery that, combined with other factors, tragically led to the

RICARDO BRUNO VS COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - UniCourt

https://unicourt.com/case/ca-ora-ricardo-bruno-vs-county-of-los-angeles-786365
Case Summary. On 06/15/2017 RICARDO BRUNO filed a Civil Right - Other Civil Right lawsuit against COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. This case was filed in Orange County Superior Courts, Orange County Civil Complex Center located in Orange, California. The case status is Not Classified By Court. Case Details Parties Documents Dockets.

Bruno v. County of Los Angeles (Deposition of Iram Salazar-Allen V1 3/1

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLn46trQ9A-dGgz6Bg1epgIKZMNW-fvlOh&si=R9hEqP_qU0lWqLO0
Share your videos with friends, family, and the world

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION - California Courts

https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/JAD21-02.PDF
1 Filed 4/22/21 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION APPELLATE DIVISION OF THE SUPERIOR COURT STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CARLOS YANEZ, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. OMAR VASQUEZ, Defendant and Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. BV 033326 Central Trial Court No. 19STUD09747 OPINION Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles

Supreme Court of The United States

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/16pdf/16-369_09m1.pdf
No. 16-369. Argued March 22, 2017—Decided May 30, 2017. The Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department received word from a confidential informant that a potentially armed and dangerous parol-ee-at-large had been seen at a certain residence. While other officers searched the main house, Deputies Conley and Pederson searched the back of the

United States Court of Appeals for The Ninth Circuit

https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2014/03/12/11-57037.pdf
In 2010, Rivera sued Los Angeles County, the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department, San Bernadino County, and the San Bernadino County Sheriff's Department ("the Counties"), alleging violations of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments, violation of the Bane Act (California Civil Code § 52.1), and common law false imprisonment.

Davalos v. County of Los Angeles (1983) - Justia Law

https://law.justia.com/cases/california/court-of-appeal/3d/142/57.html
Compliance with the Government Code is a condition precedent to filing an action against a governmental entity. (Cory v. City of Huntington Beach, supra, 43 Cal.App.3d at p. 135; Todd v. County of Los Angeles (1977) 74 Cal. App. 3d 661, 664 [141 Cal. Rptr. 622]; see also Gov. Code, § 946.4.) If a viable action can be prosecuted only after

05 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION - California Courts

https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/revpub/B178101.PDF
might arguably encourage settlement. (Doak v. Superior Court (1968) 257 Cal.App.2d 825, 831-834 (Doak) [assuming that the information was relevant to the subject matter of 5 All further undesignated section references are to the Code of Civil Procedure. We will refer to section 2017, subdivisions (a) and (b) as section 2017(a) and (b

GRANTED REVIEW TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS - California Courts

https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/revpub/B264946M.PDF
v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Defendants and Appellants. APPEALS from a judgment and orders of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Ross M. Klein, Judge. Affirmed in part, reversed in part with directions. * Under California Rules of Court, rules 8.1100 and 8.1110,

(Bruno v. County of Los Angeles) Deposition of Carolyn Frost - 11/30/2017

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4eFxCd4p_t0
This full volume deposition (Carolyn Frost 11/30/2017 full volume) was part of the Bruno v. County of Los Angeles case. If there are any questions, you may

926 North Ardmore Avenue, LLC v. County of Los Angeles :: 2017

https://law.justia.com/cases/california/supreme-court/2017/s222329.html
Name of Opinion 926 North Ardmore Avenue, LLC v. County of Los Angeles _____ Unpublished Opinion Original Appeal Original Proceeding Review Granted XXX 229 Cal.App.4th 1335 Rehearing Granted _____ Opinion No. S222329 Date Filed: June 29, 2017 _____ Court: Superior County: Los Angeles Judge: Rita J. Miller _____ Counsel: FisherBroyles, Goodson

United States v. County of Los Angeles and Los Angeles County Sheriff

https://www.justice.gov/crt/file/761261/download
1 . 2. The Los Angeles County Jails ("Jails") are an integral part ofthe public safety system in Los Angeles County, California. Together, the Jails form "Prisoners" is a defined term in Section III ofthis Agreement and includes pre-trial detainees and individuals convicted of a criminal offense. 2

Bruno v. County of Los Angeles (Deposition of Kelli Beltran V1 - 3/24/2017)

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLn46trQ9A-dEWy906mXAlwf8oHqHMkek4
Share your videos with friends, family, and the world

(Bruno v. County of Los Angeles) Deposition of Kelli Beltran - 3/24/2017

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1A-j7q-c5Dw
This full volume deposition (Kelli Beltran 3/24/2017 full volume) was part of the Bruno v. County of Los Angeles case. If there are any questions, you may c

In the Court of Appeal of The State of California Los Angeles Deputy

https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/B316067.PDF
Los Angeles County, David Sotelo and Mitchell L. Beckloff, Judges. Reversed and remanded with directions. ... (2017) 18 Cal.App.5th 340, 349, fn. 2 [utilizing the summary of facts provided in the trial ... ruling]; Standards of Review, post [noting that the trial court's orders and judgments are presumed correct]; Artal v. Allen (2003) 111

Berro v. County of Los Angeles, No. B223515 - Casetext

https://casetext.com/case/berro-v-cnty-of-l-a
Ct. No. BC376216) APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Soussan G. Bruguera, Judge. Affirmed. Haney Torbett and Steven H. Haney; Steve Berro, in pro. per.; Michael Leight for Plaintiff and Appellant in case No. B223515 and Plaintiff and Respondent in case No. B228916.

(Bruno v. County of Los Angeles) Deposition of Laura Todd - 7/31/2018

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Mrzr9w260w
This full volume deposition (Laura Todd 7/31/2018 full volume) was part of the Bruno v. County of Los Angeles case. If there are any questions, you may cont