Views : 865,120
Genre: News & Politics
Date of upload: Dec 15, 2023 ^^
Rating : 4.693 (729/8,761 LTDR)
RYD date created : 2024-05-13T23:22:25.951517Z
See in json
Top Comments of this video!! :3
47:03 The most believable line in those whole documentary comes from the mouth of a gullible woman.
"Well if that was true the church would have told us."
I laughed out loud.
54 |
Sometimes I stumble across something on YouTube that I thought I knew lots about but was looking to be entertained. This was not just entertainment for me it opened me up to look at so much more. I never really looked at the famous art pieces. I need to go back now and reexamine the art the books and might even watch some Tom Hanks movies this weekend. Love the channel thanks
96 |
Mary Magdalene is the first person givdn the Priestly Duty to "Go tell everyone" that Christ is Risen.
The Gospel story of the Empty Tomb records this.
She is the first "Priest".
The Jewish relegation of women beneath men was simply incorporated into Christianity, as equality was too great a leap for potential converts.
34 |
25:00 The Shroud has since been reassessed by impartial American scientists and only the edges are Medieval, due to repair after a fire. It seems as miraculous as Guadalupe.
13 |
The bloodline is the matriarchal line and the paternal line has to be called the heritage line - this is supported by the ka-ba-la, in which the ka is associated with the 'nobody' and the ba is associated with the body ...
Each life is the period between the first breathe and the last heart beat (nothing before and nothing after can be part of that one single life and that one single body). The sleep is the little death - we are leaving the ba for a while to 'visit' the ka and share what is necessary for the other humans. The ka has been forbidden when the patriarchal society claimed everything - indeed, we became richer with every generation, but had to give away our dreams and hopes (especially the women - you either were the daughter of your father, the spouse of your 'lord', or the mother of your son(s), but never the start of a dynasty of kings). The REN in Karen (I changed Karin into Karen when I was 18 years old) brought me to the Egyptian mythology - Ren was the NAME by which the gods knew the soul of the individual and how one would be called in the afterlife. That made sense - Zelfs haar haar was van hem (Dutch for: even her hair was his) after women became men's property. There is one good side at this story - we finally shall have to learn why God created men AND women (or was it Source who saw the benefit of that?).
Pagan has a negative connotation and that says a lot about the difference between knowledge and learning (you can't teach me a lesson but within each lesson lies the price to learn). Knowing a lot about LEARNING, I was the best teacher you could imagine, but it wasn't a problem to silence me and make me dependent on a man, who treated me as his unsatisfying employee. I 'became' a Mary Magdalene like so many single married mothers and gave other women the chance to score (for a very short period). There was no going back and that's part of the lesson, I can't teach humanity but it's no secret that regret always comes too late. TIME can't be purchased and that's why people shall have to understand how little I could finish, having to solve so many unnecessary problems. Thank God, we have learned to learn and we can start a new program whenever we feel incompetent - the only way out is in!
23 |
I read Holy Blood Holy Grail when it came out. I've also read and own all of the books cited in the video and more. And I've also been to all of the locations depicted in the video except for Roslyn Chapel, which is on my bucket list. This is a pretty good video. Lincoln and Starbird lay out their thesis well. Odd to hear Lincoln disavow Holy Blood. He has real integrity despite it being clear that he was duped by Pierre Plantard, not mentioned in the video. But duped how and to what purpose? What is most ironic, and not mentioned in the video, is that there was a lawsuit against Dan Brown by the authors of Holy Blood for the clear plagiarism in Brown's Davinci Code. When I read the Davinci Code I was SHOCKED at the blatant rip off. The result of the suit was the authors of Holy Blood COULD have won the case, if they admitted that their book was fiction. They would have won quite a bit of money. They refused to admit that their book was fiction. Further enhancing Lincoln's integrity and credibility. Because they claim that their book is non-fiction Dan Brown was allowed to plagiarize from it as it would then be considered by the court as a historical event. This is not to say that the court endorsed Holy Blood, only that it was considered by the court as a non-fiction book in intent. And then to see in this video that Lincoln discounts Holy Blood is very interesting. Lincoln disavows Holy Blood due to the uncertainties created by Plantard due to the appearance that Plantard planted the Dossiers Secrets in the French National Library and then led the Holy Blood authors to it in an effort to create political power for himself. But political power to do what? Because the bloodline is matrilineal in a patriarchal society it creates a conundrum as to continuation of Jesus' physical kingdom and the right to rule in Jesus the King's name. The Dossiers Secrets are very interesting, historically. And it appears that there is something in them that is historically accurate. The historical synchronicities in the Dossiers is too much. It would require some real genius to fake. It is possible that the bloodline actually continued in Pierre Plantard. It is clear that Plantard is a fraud, confidence man, and general trickster. And that in and of itself SHOULD discredit the Dossiers. Tainted in one thing, tainted in all things, as they say. I think that is what influences Lincoln in his statement in the video regarding Holy Blood. But that shouldn't discredited EVERYTHING in Holy Blood. It is possible that Plantard actually carries the bloodline. It is also possible that the bloodline continues in the St Clair family, the owners of Roselyn chapel and who controls access to the crypts where the answers to the secrets of the Freemasons and the Templars may lie. How they can resist opening the crypts is beyond me. How they are not curious to death as to what is contained there is a real mystery.
8 |
@michaelogden5958
4 months ago
"The DaVinci Code" may or may not be a lot of things, but it WAS a great read.
265 |