High Definition Standard Definition Theater
Video id : r5HqIhyXzvg
ImmersiveAmbientModecolor: #ecdfd2 (color 2)
Video Format : 22 (720p) openh264 ( https://github.com/cisco/openh264) mp4a.40.2 | 44100Hz
Audio Format: Opus - Normalized audio
PokeTubeEncryptID: 37a803b46223d9543655ae110c4c05f4af95441fb2ffed8ad9b676d46be357d758b989f9b3c2df4a5c914f1bb52eebab
Proxy : eu-proxy.poketube.fun - refresh the page to change the proxy location
Date : 1715758326605 - unknown on Apple WebKit
Mystery text : cjVIcUloeVh6dmcgaSAgbG92ICB1IGV1LXByb3h5LnBva2V0dWJlLmZ1bg==
143 : true
Why Did the Kaiser HAVE to Abdicate? | The 1918 German Revolution
Jump to Connections
65,644 Views • Mar 27, 2023 • Click to toggle off description
Why did Kaiser Wilhelm II have to abdicate?
By late 1918, the German Empire was descending into chaos. World War I was clearly lost, and the German people were tired of fighting. Starvation afflicted thousands as national resources were directed toward the failing frontline, and the Empire's leaders appeared unconcerned by the suffering of the population. At the very least they (led and represented by the last Deutscher Kaiser, Wilhelm II) were much more concerned with continuing the pointless war. Germans had had enough; the question was whether a new political class could contain their fury.

Subscribe for more history:
youtube.com/c/LookBackHistory?sub_confirmation=1

Instagram (behind the scenes!):
www.instagram.com/james_king3125/

More Videos:
How Did the German Empire Actually Work?:    • How Did the German Empire Actually Work?  
How Did the Allies Divide Germany?:    • How Was Germany Divided? | The Allied...  
How Did Austria-Hungary Actually Work?:    • How Did the Austro-Hungarian Empire A...  
How Did Romania Unite?:    • How Did Romania Unite? | The Two Roma...  
The Franco-Prussian War Explained:    • What Was the Franco-Prussian War | Th...  

Sources Consulted:
Gerhard Rempel. “The German Revolution of 1918.” Delivered at Western New England University. web.archive.org/web/20080705200236/http://mars.wne…

Miller, Stuart T. Mastering Modern European History. London: Macmillan Education LTD, 1990.

“President Wilson's Message to Congress, January 8, 1918;” Records of the United States Senate; Record Group 46; Records of the United States Senate; National Archives. In “President Woodrow Wilson’s 14 Points (1918).”
www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/president-woo…

Weinhauer, Klaus, McElligott, Anthony, and Heinsohn, Kirsten, eds. Germany 1916-23 : A Revolution in Context. Bielefeld: transcript, 2015. cup.columbia.edu/book/germany-1916-23/978383762734…

Wilhelm II. The Kaiser’s Memoirs. Translated by Thomas R. Ybarra. New York and London: Harper & Brothers Publishers. 1922.
archive.org/details/kaisersmemoirs001358mbp/page/n…
Metadata And Engagement

Views : 65,644
Genre: Education
Date of upload: Mar 27, 2023 ^^


Rating : 4.927 (39/2,102 LTDR)
RYD date created : 2024-05-14T19:57:27.056222Z
See in json
Tags
Connections

YouTube Comments - 203 Comments

Top Comments of this video!! :3

@jonathanwebster7091

1 year ago

It's worth noting that the Weimar Republic's first President, Friedrich Ebert, though a (majority) social democrat, was also a (constitutional) monarchist, and opposed the declaration of a republic (in fact, he said as such-in anger-to the guy who actually proclaimed the republic, Phillip Schiedemann). He said on the subject of the German revolution: "I hate it like I hate hell". Which also gives the somewhat odd situation that both the Presidents of the Weimar Republic -Ebert and Hindenburg-were both in favour of a monarchy.

165 |

@catalinmarius3985

1 year ago

A response to a question I didn't know I needed an answer. I always knew that the Kaiser abdicated after losing World War 1, but never knew the details. Thank you for this video!

118 |

@jonathanwebster7091

1 year ago

Wilhelm's contemporary central powers monarch; Ferdinand of Bulgaria, himself quite a skillful politician (he was known as "Ferdy the Fox" for his adroitness) was able to preserve his dynasty, and the monarchy (which lasted until 1946) by abdicating in favour of his son. Indeed, Bulgaria was unique amongst the main Central powers in that it was able to keep its monarchy following the war (basically for Ferdinand's sacrificing of himself and his own personal interests to save his dynasty and throne for his son).

67 |

@waynecorker9098

1 year ago

This explanation overlooked that the allies lead by France refused to negotiate with a Germany with willhem II this position was also supported by Woodrow Wilson Thus for an end to the miltary action by the allies had to the kisser had to GO. The German government was paralysed and it is not clear who authorised the acceptance of the armistice terms that was signed early on November 11. The point is that removal of the kaiser was not just an internal german question and the enteant powers played a significant role in the Kaiser's removal.

27 |

@flintweststeel5568

1 year ago

Thank you for uploading exactly what I was curious about, as always

12 |

@charmyzard

1 year ago

History is my favorite soap opera. Thanks for the content, Look Back! The Central Powers are always captivating to talk about.

5 |

@Edmonton-of2ec

1 year ago

6:48 Thank you for not using the word abdicate. It should be noted the last King of Bavaria, Ludwig III, never abdicated the throne. He did release the Anif Declaration (from Anif Palace in Austria) reliving the soldiers and civil servants under his command of their oaths of loyalty to his person, but nowhere in that statement did he abdicate or renounce the crown.

13 |

@MarcusAgrippa390

1 year ago

Wow.... All that drama over the Kaiser and wanting an end to the monarchy etc. And then WW2...

22 |

@Edmonton-of2ec

1 year ago

4:20 It should also be noted the reason Prince Maximilian was pulling out all the stops is because he was trying to save his own potential throne. He was the heir presumptive of Frederick II, Grand Duke of Baden, his childless first cousin. If he failed, he was not only killing the Hohenzollern monarchy, but he was also destroying his own chance to sit on his family’s ancestral throne. Although funny enough, if the empire had survived, Maximilian would have been Grand Duke of Baden for only a little more then a year, from August 1928 to November 1929

15 |

@ConstantineTheFirst

1 year ago

great job at making the most intresting to watch content

1 |

@Tabako-san

1 year ago

It should be noted since not mentioned here, although inspired by the Bolshevik revolution of Russia many key members of the Spartakusbund were critical of Leninist policies like Roza Luxembourg. This is the reason that the SB was heavily disowned by Stalinists outside of East Germans. Luxembourg believed freedom of the press, free general elections and freedom of assembly were core components to a generalised communist democracy as opposed to using the state as a tool of class oppression solely. She was extremely critical and anti-Bolshevik and anti-Lenin in this regard in her writings. "Freedom only for the supporters of the government, only for the members of one party – however numerous they may be – is no freedom at all. Freedom is always and exclusively freedom for the one who thinks differently."

15 |

@Veriox22

1 year ago

Very detailed video indeed

|

@micahistory

1 year ago

nice video, I was actually just discussing this yesterday

5 |

@andreasmetzger7619

11 months ago

HRH Prince Max von Baden was the last heir to the grand duchy of Baden, my home state. He was one of the more liberal aristocrats and cousin of the Kaiser. Unfortunately he wasn't able to "rescue" Germany as intended. He abdicated the Kaiser and caused the proclamation of the Republic.

3 |

@veldrensavoth7119

1 year ago

2:34 that photo is perfectly timed

|

@laurentdrozin812

1 year ago

The decision to send the fleet out to fight was so stupid. The war was lost. Why send even more people to their death?

4 |

@colindaniels945

1 month ago

I think another factor in why the system ended up breaking down was because it was set up so that only one person could actually run it, that being Otto Von Bismarck. After he left was when it really started to come apart because he was the only one who knew how to run it,he was the only one who knew how it worked.

|

@johnburns9634

1 year ago

I read the book Why nations go to war. In it it mentions that Admiral Tirpitz asked, "If we're declaring war on Russia why are we sending most of our forces into France?" He mentioned never getting a satisfactory answer. How the war was conducted on both sides was shameful, and in the end, the Emperor abdicated in part because of the conduct. It's interesting that the army joined the revolution. as during WWII, the British thought that bombing would end the war, but after a bombing those in Germany only stuck together. You hear many stories of the blitz, but less about in Germany. After one bombing. there were teachers who were striking, and the police showed up, but reported that it was a legal strike, and no reason to arrest anyone. After bombings, like in the UK, groups seemed to ignore the labels.

2 |

@jeffwolcott7815

1 year ago

Where were the monarchist this whole time? I'd expect some of them at least would try to put the Crown Prince on the throne of Germany.

8 |

@Halal_Lettuce

10 months ago

I now want to see Germany restore its Monarchy, so that we can see Kaiser Wilhelm II’s body exhumed and reburied in Berlin, in a service that any Kaiser deserves. A bit like King Richard III of England.

2 |

Go To Top