ImmersiveAmbientModecolor: #b0d3de (color 2)
Video Format : 22 (720p) openh264 ( https://github.com/cisco/openh264) mp4a.40.2 | 44100Hz
Audio Format: Opus - Normalized audio
PokeTubeEncryptID: 3149b4fd0ccb02bdba0a9f6c2248bebd96267be0c03c1981d38d3a4cc278615f980c87fa7a7a247d960fc2dc4cf841c9
Proxy : eu-proxy.poketube.fun - refresh the page to change the proxy location
Date : 1715958435350 - unknown on Apple WebKit
Mystery text : bWFFNVRGbTVpcDggaSAgbG92ICB1IGV1LXByb3h5LnBva2V0dWJlLmZ1bg==
143 : true
339,740 Views âą Aug 14, 2023 âą Click to toggle off description
#Oppenheimer was right. Today, the world is closer to #nuclear ruin than at any time since the height of the Cold War. The #DoomsdayClock stands at 90 seconds to midnight.
Support CaspianReport
â YouTube membership âș youtube.com/channel/UCwnKziETDbHJtx78nIkfYug/join
â Patreon âș www.patreon.com/CaspianReport
â PayPal âș www.paypal.me/caspianreport
â Merchandise âșteespring.com/stores/caspianr...
Crypto endorsement
â Bitcoin âș 1MwRNXWWqzbmsHova7FMW11zPftVZVUfbU
â Ether âș 0xfE4c310ccb6f52f9D220F25Ce76Dec0493dF9aA0
â Bitcoin Cash âș 1BKLti4Wq4EK9fsBnYWC91caK7NZfUhNw9
Join us on Facebook or Twitter
â Twitter âș twitter.com/CaspianReport
â Facebook âș www.facebook.com/CaspianReport
â My equipment and editing software âș www.amazon.com/shop/caspianreport?listId=2GSSTV5TBâŠ
Watch CaspianReport in other languages
â Spanish âș youtube.com/c/HistoriaGeopol%C3%ADtica/featured
â Russian âș youtube.com/c/TheCuriousCat/featured
#ad #sponsored
Views : 339,740
Genre: News & Politics
Date of upload: Aug 14, 2023 ^^
Rating : 4.73 (1,041/14,357 LTDR)
RYD date created : 2024-05-17T01:21:11.429459Z
See in json
YouTube Comments - 1,763 Comments
Top Comments of this video!! :3
Nothing like waking up in the morning and getting reminded about nuclear winter. Have a great day everyone!
799 |
Itâs unlikely that the first use threat is going to come from a relatively stable state actor, but from a new or unknown nuclear armed entity that has been attacked with conventional forces.
791 |
bro really put a future career ad in a video about nuclear Armageddon
9 |
At this point, I hate to say, with humanity's track record of well-established behaviors of self-destruction and selfishness, it is only a matter of time before these weapons are used. Especially with zealots in the mix.
39 |
In my humble opinion, the biggest danger with nuclear weapons is that someone could misinterpret opponents move for an actual attack, or an accident causing a nuclear explosion. Then again, a world without nuclear weapons would be a lot less stable one. Imagine how close Soviet Union and USA got to a nuclear war. Now imagine what would stop then from an open war if mutual destruction was not on the table.
479 |
âNeglect breeds peril. When caution falters, the instruments of death impose their ruthless resolveâ my god what a bar
89 |
In 1965, the U.S.A. lost a nuclear bomb near Japan (at the Philippine Sea). It was kept a secret and only revealed to Japan in 1989. That nuke was never recovered.
The wikipedia page is called "1965 Philippine Sea A-4 incident".
261 |
To get rid of nukes all together youâd have to get rid of every single reason anyone anywhere would want to go to war. Otherwise if there is any chance of any kind of armed conflict nations should be trying to build the best weapons to destroy their enemies with. Thatâs kind of how war has always worked. Even when there are treaties that limit certain types of arms in warfare, once a real war actually breaks out those treaties go out the window.
10 |
Without yield restrictions it's still dangerous, less than 500 but has 10+ megatons yield is quite devastating.
177 |
I think the alternative is much worse. Without nuclear weapons, major powers would trigger world wars probably every 20-50 years with their conventional armies clashing on the battlefield. And we already had a few of those before. Yes, one nuclear war would destroy our planet forever, but I think that the odds of that happening are much more slim than having a conventional world war every 20-30 years (in the absence of nuclear weapons). Which would probably mean that the world would lose around 300 million or more people every 3 decades. In the grand scheme of things, the loss of life would be much higher compared to a nuclear annihilation that would probably never come.
By owning nuclear weapons, conflicts between major powers are much smaller in scale and generally in the form of proxy wars, using third party countries. As a result, less people are dying and conflicts are generally confined in a smaller geographical area. I think WW3 would've already happened long time ago between the West and the Soviet Union, if they hadn't had nukes back then.
15 |
It's somewhat comical in a sad and dark sort of way just how much overkill there is in the quantity of nukes in the world. Thank you for another informative episode. Hopefully these terrible weapons will never be used.
God be with you out there everybody. âïž
24 |
Very important thing to note, the science of a nuclear winter is heavily disputed, there are many papers that compare the level of debris to major volcanic eruptions and they tend to find that it would be very unlikely for us to trigger a nuclear winter as even volcanic eruptions that spew much more debris don't always. But the scientific consensus is let people believe a nuclear winter is a guarantee so they dont use the bombs
36 |
The doomsday clock does not exclusively track the severity solely on nukes threat⊠that is a misleading point right there
120 |
I had nightmares growing up during the Cold War. If you werenât there you donât know. The absurdity that we are closer now than ever before and itâs not on the societal radar says a lot about how our civilization sits on the fence. Go look at the pics from the Hiroshima blast and how the outlines from the shadows of the victims are still cast as if they are still standing there.
7 |
I would like to say, everytime that a situation where nuclear war almost broke out, either by intention or through mistake, there has ALWAYS been at least one person unwilling to push the button. It takes multiple in order for nukes to be launched, and it seems that 1/3 of people have enough humanity in their hearts to not condemn the world to destruction.
3 |
So Russia, China, NK, Pakistan, India, Iran are to blame for the risks in 0:45 , but never USA nor Israel?
Please remind me who actually used nuclear bombs against civil population.
4 |
Barbenheimer saying "I am death, destroyer of Barbie worlds" is so philosophical it changed my viewpoint on life and space
176 |
Great content. You produce high value videos and they're always well researched. Your bias is obvious and that's natural because we are human and will always gravitate to one side or the other. Respect to you sir and thank you for keeping us informed đ
12 |
I think nuclear minimization is a great idea, honestly. It's resolved a lot of my uncertainty on whether it's better to abolish nuclear weapons, or keep them around as a deterrence
14 |
@CaspianReport
9 months ago
Visit 80000hours.org/caspian and start planning a career that is meaningful, fulfilling, and helps solve one of the worldâs most pressing problems. Make your 80,000 hours count.
72 |