Views : 3,630
Genre: News & Politics
Date of upload: Streamed live on Apr 24, 2024 ^^
Rating : 5 (0/70 LTDR)
RYD date created : 2024-05-10T10:41:48.474891Z
See in json
Top Comments of this video!! :3
Might be of interest who funds this institute;-
Substantial funding has also come from the Ford Foundation,
(has given a great deal of money to left-wing and center-left organizations)
the Carnegie Corporation of New York,
( funds left wing ideals - calls its founder a "robber baron" !)
the Rockefeller Brothers Fund,
( left leaning or though some sources differ )
and Schumann Center for Media and Democracy.
( Democratic Party and left-wing advocacy group politics.)
1 |
This conflict with Russia has already been decided. The aid only serves to drag out the inevitable outcome.
1) It doesn't matter how much funding or access to weapons they can get, without the human resource, this is a vain exercise. And this idea that it buys time, for what exactly? It's not like all of a sudden Ukraine is going to magically have soldiers. They don't grow on trees. Not even those sent for training would be enough to offset the disparity to Russia.
2) The fact that Ukraine has become totally dependent on the western partners means, Russia achieved one of its key objectives which was to neutralize Ukraine's military capacity.
3) The aspect of the seeming slow territorial gains is also a part of the strategy now that they have substantially weakened the military capabilities they can afford to drag the conflict into a battle of attrition that minimizes loses for Russia while weakening Ukraine. Also this brings the war to a pace Russia is able to maintain for many more years to come which would outlast the western funding.
4) Remember for Russia, for as long as the conflict stands, they have the advantage not only in weapons but soldiers on top of that, their economy is growing because of the war so while this prolonged fued empties European coffers it extends the shelf life of the Russian economy.
This novel idea of a Ukrainian fight back is a pipe dream, if they failed to with greater resources when the opponent was still not fully organized, it's unrealistic to expect them make gains.
Soon this will fade like the many global conflicts we have.
7 |
Liana Fox, Russia reacted to Georgia in 2018, and it staied there for a couple of weeks, didn't occupy it. So why are you using it as an example of Putin's future intentions. In fact the war with Georgia refutes everything you are saying and it seems you cannot grasp the points why is that, because "Russia"!
|
Peace in Ukraine is nothing for NATO has been made clear several times.
NATO opposed the Minsk agreement in 2015, it was revealed in interviews with Professor Stephen Cohen who followed all communication between the US and Russia before he passed away in 2020.
NATO also opposed the peace draft from Istanbul in the spring of 2022 that the parties accepted.
The Rand corporation has already written the manual for the conflict in 2019. This is evident in a report on Ukraine 2019 where Nordstream is also mentioned.
3 |
@AgnieszkaNishka
2 weeks ago
With exception of Liana Fix, excellent discussion. Ms. Fix has no idea that Russia has won war of attrition, b/c Ukraine is running out of men and NATO cannot produce enough weapons for Ukraine, and longer fighting will go on, more men and land Ukraine will loose.
15 |