Views : 79
Genre: Education
Date of upload: Jun 11, 2023 ^^
Rating : 5 (0/15 LTDR)
RYD date created : 2023-06-19T00:40:01.197371Z
See in json
Top Comments of this video!! :3
One if your sources says "study by Krings et al. (1999) on mitochondrial DNA clines along the Nile Valley found that a Eurasian cline runs from Northern Egypt to Southern Sudan and a Sub-Saharan cline from Southern Sudan to Northern Egypt, derived from a sample size of 224 individuals (68 Egyptians, 80 Nubians, 76 southern Sudanese). The study also found Egypt and Nubia have low and similar amounts of divergence for both mtDNA types, which is consistent with historical evidence for long-term interactions between Egypt and Nubia. However, there are significant differences between the composition of the mtDNA gene pool of the Egyptian samples and that of the Nubians and Southern Sudanese samples. The diversity of the Eurasian mtDNA type was highest in Egypt and lowest in southern Sudan, whereas the diversity of the sub-Saharan mtDNA type was lowest in Egypt and highest in southern Sudan. The authors suggested in their conclusion that Egypt and Nubia had more genetic contact than either did with southern Sudan and that the migration from north to south was either earlier or lesser in the extent of gene flow than the migration from south to north.
|
Sir it's over. I actually came to view your sources on your 3 second video
*The Coptic art resembles Greco-Roman. Not ancient Egyptian or Ancient Nubia. Their art is alot closer to eachother.
*Don't send wiki links
"The new study pretty much confirms that both DE and E are African in originnot Eurasian. Also, both E1b1b and E1b1a were born in Africa, however, some E1b1b individuals left Africa to the Near East at some point. Some later returned back to Africa as admixed. Others stayed in the Middle East and others migrated to West Eurasia and Southern Europe.
E1b1a, on the other hand, is said to have never left Africa but was reported in 6% of Natufian samples. As for E1a (the parent of E1b1b and E1b1a), it seems to have never left Africa at all. Or it may have left Africa and became E1b1b after admixture with West Asians. More research is needed. To make things clearer;
DE (the ancestors of both the D and E clads) is mainly found in Nigeria (that is, unless the Tibetan âDEâ, once re-analyzed, turns out to be something else).
D0 is found both in West Africa (deep in the African continent) and in the Middle East (Saudi Arabia and Syria).
D is (so far) is found in Asia.
E1a/E-M132, a very basal branch of E older than E1b1b, is exclusively African and is commonly found for instance among the Dogon, and other similar peoples of Mali/the West African savanna-like the Diola, Papel, and Manjakâwho, like the Dogon, are fully sub-Saharan.
E1b1b branch of E is found in both Afric and Eurasia but is very likely to have come from North or East Africa
E1b1a is mostly African - but was also found in 6% of Natufian samples.
So to sum up, the whole E family is mostly found in Africa (with the exception of the single E1b1b clad that was probably born in Africa but left the continent at some point, and returned back as admixed thousands of years later).
Regardless of where E1b1b originates, the physical characteristics of the ancient E1b1b carriers were certainly not affiliated with many of its present-day carriers who possess a much larger amount of Neanderthal DNA, who carry the light skin depigmentation gene SLC24A5 and who are lactose tolerant.
In terms of genetics, all modern-day E1b1b carriers are related to the first E1b1b carriers, however, in terms of physical traits and phenotype, most have no resemblance at all."
1 |
@AntoniousFrancis
11 months ago
Please All check the links to sources of that topic in my video Description up there đđđ And feel free to comment anytime and say whatever you want to say. Consider it your own channel not mine! đ
3 |