High Definition Standard Definition Theater
Video id : et7XUoenAxo
ImmersiveAmbientModecolor: #ccb3b2 (color 1)
Video Format : 22 (720p) openh264 ( https://github.com/cisco/openh264) mp4a.40.2 | 44100Hz
Audio Format: Opus - Normalized audio
PokeTubeEncryptID: 30a683c3a900a2453d72899e1d893c7ef8107900981bce0b8d946bbf5d9f21406af6480bae3e64785485e91652e53a19
Proxy : eu-proxy.poketube.fun - refresh the page to change the proxy location
Date : 1716372323407 - unknown on Apple WebKit
Mystery text : ZXQ3WFVvZW5BeG8gaSAgbG92ICB1IGV1LXByb3h5LnBva2V0dWJlLmZ1bg==
143 : true
35,628 Views • Sep 23, 2023 • Click to toggle off description
The age-old debate on free will has resurfaced with new fervor. With many contending it's merely an illusion, distinguished biologist Denis Noble presents a revolutionary perspective, arguing our very bodies may be the compass to our autonomy.

Watch the full talk at: iai.tv/video/free-will-is-not-an-illusion&utm_medi…

Denis Noble stands as a beacon in the realm of physiology. As one of the trailblazers of Systems Biology, and Emeritus Professor of Cardiovascular Physiology at Oxford University, Noble's profound insights originate from his groundbreaking work, most notably his development of the first substantial mathematical model of the heart's mechanisms in 1960.

The Institute of Art and Ideas features videos and articles from cutting edge thinkers discussing the ideas that are shaping the world, from metaphysics to string theory, technology to democracy, aesthetics to genetics. Subscribe today! iai.tv/subscribe?utm_source=YouTube&utm_medium=des…

For debates and talks: iai.tv/
For articles: iai.tv/articles
For courses: iai.tv/iai-academy/courses
Metadata And Engagement

Views : 35,628
Genre: Education
Date of upload: Sep 23, 2023 ^^


Rating : 4.241 (223/953 LTDR)
RYD date created : 2024-05-21T14:12:03.682455Z
See in json
Tags
Connections
Nyo connections found on the description ;_; report a issue lol

YouTube Comments - 395 Comments

Top Comments of this video!! :3

@LeeGee

7 months ago

Just as we were getting to the meat, I learnt that free videos are an illusion.

27 |

@wattshumphrey8422

7 months ago

I'm hoping that in the full talk he gets from "stochastic processes" to "free will" with some important intermediate step. A "free will" entirely dependent upon chance is not free, but random.

48 |

@paulusbrent9987

7 months ago

Stochastic events can not be the source of free will. It would make us only act randomly.

19 |

@FM-lo9vv

7 months ago

The talk was amazing while it lasted. It's bad practice and even disrespectful to viewers to make us watch/listen for 15 min and then not get the payoff. The effect was not of a cliffhanger, but rather of a 'catch', and the emotions associated with this experience are likely not conducive to converting customers. Please do tell us about subscriptions for exclusive content, but if you share something, please give us a dish we can eat, then we can make our minds if we want the full banquet. Nevertheless thank you for the quality of the ideas and calibre of the speaker.

34 |

@kirillnovik8661

7 months ago

A simple and effective argument. I really enjoyed it. But it's pretty cruel when they make you go to the website to buy a subscription to watch the full video.

72 |

@thethe1

7 months ago

Denis Noble is a Godfather of systems biology

10 |

@colorfulbookmark

3 months ago

Dr.Noble's intellects are what we need to learn and continue to, free will talk's intentionaliy. People in same perspectives are great people I think.

2 |

@Apebek

6 months ago

From a philosophical point of view. Descartes said "I think therefor I am" and Socrates said "I know only one thing and that is that I know nothing". Basically they are saying the same thing; That the one thing you are 100% sure of is that you have a conscious experience. Everything else (the physical world) could be a a dream. The only thing we do is process information but how can we be sure of where that information comes from? If there is no consciousness then the physical universe has nothing to project onto. It is only the mind that differentiates within a clump of matter and in that way creates different numbers. Without it the universe would be just one thing (absolute nothingness). There would be no space and time to measure and no person that can assume it exists. To me it is more plausible that consciousness is more real then objective reality and that it is transcendental. It is superior because all physical matter can be grasped into an idea but not every idea can be manifested into physical reality. I believe the question of consciousness and free will can never be answered through modern science, because science reduces everything to data. We can measure brain activity, but not conscious experience.

2 |

@Counterjoint

7 months ago

The whole argument boils down to a misconception of what free will is. He seems to think free will is possible via any kind of nondeterminism. He thinks Brownian motion is the candidate but it only takes a few seconds of thought to realise that random processes can't explain how a conscious being is able to make a choice either. It's more than just indeterminacy that's required. Free will requires some kind of transcendental force that is able to willfully choose one outcome out of a number of different outcomes. Randomness implies the complete opposite. If he really wanted to appeal to uncertainty then i'm not sure why he didn't just invoke quantum uncertainty, which is based on fundamental and true randomness (this still wouldn't explain free will)

79 |

@sonarbangla8711

7 months ago

Just like probability and determinism, free will is both free and 'not free'.

6 |

@driggerfireon5760

1 week ago

Einstein of today. So much respect. 85 years old and still out there teaching and sharing.

|

@stephenlawrence4903

7 months ago

Before arguing for free will one needs to be very clear about what it is. Most who don't think we have free will do think we make choices. The question is how could we have selected the options we did not select? Is it ultimately a matter of fortune, good or bad, which option we did select? If the answer to that is yes, then we don't have free will.

8 |

@annakarl9989

7 months ago

Thankyou 🎉

1 |

@monkerud2108

7 months ago

either you fetch a criteria from within experience, or you fetch a criteria from outside experience, and if its outside experience its unrelated to who you are, what you feel and your thought process, so how can you ever hope to create a gap between what it is like to make a false choice and make a "real choice", i have no idea what it even means to suggest, and someone needs to tell me what it is, as far as i can see its impossible, so if free will actually means anything it has to be about the content of experience and thereby be compatible with all your choices being false choices.

|

@beingsentient

7 months ago

This is a dirty trick. I watched this video and got very interested, only to have it end and be continued elsewhere with a pay wall. And I don't understand why many others here don't complain. Are all comments here from people who saw only half the lecture? Don't these people realize they didn't get Noble's full argument? How can they make so many comments on half an argument? Do they realize it's only half the argument? Baffling.

3 |

@scotchhollow

6 months ago

I don’t think we can ever objectively verify that the physical world even exists outside of our conscious experience. Even with measurements and tools. To say we don’t have free will based on a deterministic physical world can’t be 100% proven at the end of the day.

2 |

@danstoica2824

1 month ago

There is predeterminism through the desired or expected result, when you act positively, responsibly and intelligently through improvement through trained awareness. When you are chaotic and less conscious, there is determinism, but not free will, which at the level of predeterminism is absolute. I understand why certain people have the impression that there is determinism or predeterminism, because they are poor at the level of emotional awareness, they are poor in emotional intelligence, in positive and intelligent emotions and feelings. So the fact that we declare something does not show us the path to follow or the one that is understood to identify a reality, this is the logic of determinism, while the logic of free will presupposes an increasingly advanced connection with one's own but also the relational capacity to become aware and in this way we can have the power of optimal and high understanding of our own or the common reality through the compatibility of the respective level. So there is clearly free will and the "explanations" that the simple statement of the cause-effect phenomenon does not say and will never say anything logical. It is about compatibility with positive and negative actions through determinism, but it reinforces the idea of ​​free will as an expected result, as power. Simply put, only as something less conscious and less trained, there is determinism and predeterminism, i.e. the robot. There is an existential training exercise of reality awareness that many leave to chance. That's the only way you reach a high level like divinity, a similar kind of compatibility. The idea is that intelligence represents the ability to retain information and recognize patterns, but also emotion and feelings, that's the only way you're complete, otherwise you're insufficiently evolved or with a potential still untapped. For this reason, the strong inner imagination is greatly enhanced by the environment through feelings and emotions. Otherwise, we have intelligent people, but just as it is specific to artificial intelligence to reproduce, but not to understand and without strong internal imagination and capitalized by the external environment. For this reason, our perception and understanding of intelligence and consciousness is wrong. We live more in a world of appearances and less honorable. Of course we have enough compromises and there is also adaptation, but not enough to create a strong and authentic reality. Adaptation only helps us to evolve, but not every adaptation is built for a qualitative path of evolution. Good has all the explanations regarding what is good or bad, evil only explains evil and uses good and that's it. But power belongs to good and obviously free will which represents awareness and the power to change things for the better and to choose the good and the happiness that fulfills us, that lasts and is great.

|

@chikaokolo4929

1 month ago

Random processes don’t create Beethovens or Michelangelos. The reason why some scientists are still debating on the decisions vs determinism is because they refuse to admit that a mind is derived from an intelligent God. Even if we could describe consciousness purely from genetics and neurons —the order found in these could only logically be explained by a random process.

|

@IosefDzhugashvili

7 months ago

PLEASE just put the full videos on this channel. The IAI video player is not a good user experience.

|

@monkerud2108

7 months ago

there is no criteria distinguishing the content of experience in a false choice or a real choice, and so its two identical concepts in terms of the content of experience. that means that whatever you can possible mean by free will, it is compatible with determinism.

7 |

Go To Top