@Ms.A.Matthews415

2 weeks ago

It's unfortunate that while Jeanie was married, she didn't show the same concern for her child health and safety. But, once Jeezy filed for divorce, then it became I'm worried about the welfare of my child. Cherry picking when one is concerned or compliscent is not a choice. Either Jeanie was concerned from the beginning, or she tolerated the behavior for the sake of her lifestyle and own selfish needs. Jeanie chose to stay in abusive relationships according to her own words as she and Jeezy went to therapy. No ethical therapist would ever advise a victim of domestic violence to stay in a relationship with the alleged abuser or subject one's minor children to abuse by witnessing it ( CPS has clear guidelines when it comes to domestic violence and allowing one's children to witness abuse. It is considered by definition child abuse, and YES CPS can open a case against both parties). I'm not attempting to shame Jeanie, instead I'm attempting to spread the level of one being compliscent in subjecting one's minor children to alleged child abuse/ child endangerment and using mental health profession to justify why one would stay in an abusive relationship. The therapist does not advise victims to stay with the alleged perpetrator. Hopefully, this can resolved amicably and both parties can move on. But Jeanie should definitely get individual therapy for else I order to understand why one would stay in an abusive relationship allegedly and subject minor child to abuse.

2 |