High Definition Standard Definition Theater
Video id : eUcD_jgl_rQ
ImmersiveAmbientModecolor: #d0cfc2 (color 2)
Video Format : 22 (720p) openh264 ( https://github.com/cisco/openh264) mp4a.40.2 | 44100Hz
Audio Format: Opus - Normalized audio
PokeTubeEncryptID: 9bf1e553eefca6b601d3b434bb4c4434c507a08e04559e198224b21286096261919c1717e3f84b5bf184e4a14f66ffec
Proxy : usa-proxy.poketube.fun - refresh the page to change the proxy location
Date : 1714651685975 - unknown on Apple WebKit
Mystery text : ZVVjRF9qZ2xfclEgaSAgbG92ICB1IHVzYS1wcm94eS5wb2tldHViZS5mdW4=
143 : true
Korematsu v United States - the U.S. Supreme Court Case legalizing Japanese Internment
Jump to Connections
10,648 Views • Jul 15, 2020 • Click to toggle off description
This lecture video is about a landmark 1944 US Supreme Court case upholding the exclusion of Japanese Americans, Korematsu v. United States, 323 U.S. 214. First, I discuss the majority opinion, authored by Justice Black, which focuses mainly on whether the court should apply strict scrutiny when assess-sing Exclusion Order #34. Then there are in-depth readings of passages from two of the dissenting opinions, authored by Justices Roberts and Murphy. Roberts focuses on the fact that there was another relevant order, Proclamation 4, which combined with Exclusion Order #34 to make it such that Japanese Americans were forced into concentration camps solely because of their race or ancestry. Murphy simply focuses on how racial orders are unreasonable. This lecture is part of a broader Philosophy of Law course, in which we read several chapters of HLA Hart's The Concept of Law.
Metadata And Engagement

Views : 10,648
Genre: Education
Date of upload: Jul 15, 2020 ^^


Rating : 4.794 (13/239 LTDR)
RYD date created : 2022-01-28T04:21:09.705582Z
See in json
Tags
Connections
Nyo connections found on the description ;_; report a issue lol

YouTube Comments - 17 Comments

Top Comments of this video!! :3

@brandonbonner9208

3 years ago

Great Lecture. Very informative.

10 |

@BubblegumBlast69

2 years ago

excellent playlist!

2 |

@rajendramisir3530

11 months ago

Impressive explanation of the two dissenting opinions in this landmark US Supreme Court case. It would be interesting to read the summary of the majority opinions in this case.

1 |

@footnotes129

1 year ago

Interesting, provocative lecture. However, I suggest avoiding the term "internment" and using the term "imprisonment" or "detainment", because the term "internment" refers specifically to prisoners of war. Just call the action like it is and not by any euphemism. Moreover, Jackson's dissent matters in the 6-3 decision, especially in light of Roberts' seemingly cavalier remark about the court of history's precedent on the Korematsu case in the recent Trump v Hawaii decision. Nevertheless, great job!

3 |

@fredfeirtag1009

9 months ago

No mention of Robert Jackson's dissent? Shocking!

1 |

@GrumpyCat-mw5xl

10 months ago

I think it’s just common sense that Americans regardless of race are still Americans. If they sent Japanese to camps then German and Italian Americans should have also been sent to camps.

|

@facilegoose9347

1 year ago

Emperor of the Japanese title, divinity status thereof depending on religious confession, and the serial political unreliability of naturalized Japanese that gave aid and comfort to a downed IJN pilot in Hawaii during the Niʻihau incident are required for full context. Same dual loyalty question came up again with JFK's presidency as the first Catholic elected, and only Imperial Japanese lack of unconventional warfare planning prevented the kind of saboteur mayhem anticipated by the order (e.g. CCP/PLA Covid release with 2020 Lunar New Year outbound flights from mainland China).

1 |

Go To Top