ImmersiveAmbientModecolor: #303236 (color 2)
Video Format : 22 (720p) openh264 ( https://github.com/cisco/openh264) mp4a.40.2 | 44100Hz
Audio Format: Opus - Normalized audio
PokeTubeEncryptID: 5b17b7a203f48b929258d4d0e1b6f7a1d113de76674a44a1a10928299eb26d6dab50cad93a424e177357f564234aaa84
Proxy : eu-proxy.poketube.fun - refresh the page to change the proxy location
Date : 1715670085601 - unknown on Apple WebKit
Mystery text : ZEJHZTl6Y0pGMFUgaSAgbG92ICB1IGV1LXByb3h5LnBva2V0dWJlLmZ1bg==
143 : true
20,077 Views β’ Mar 7, 2013 β’ Click to toggle off description
Views : 20,077
Genre: People & Blogs
Date of upload: Mar 7, 2013 ^^
Rating : 3.167 (11/13 LTDR)
RYD date created : 2022-01-20T09:20:09.879387Z
See in json
YouTube Comments - 9 Comments
Top Comments of this video!! :3
HOW IS THE VIEWING OF THIS STRAIGHT-FORWARD REVIEW OF OPAQUE FULL COVERAGE BRIEFS STILL RESTRICTED? WHAT IN THE ACTUAL F*CK, YouTube?????? GET IT TOGETHER!
1 |
This video is a straight-forward customer review of opaque full coverage apparel taken of and by me. YouTube's restriction of its viewing constitutes ILLEGAL SEX DISCRIMINATION based on my gender not matching the gender association of the apparel being reviewed.
Said tort is compounded by YouTube posting SLANDER about me and my video across the internet, to wit:
The "Notice" claiming this is an 'Age-restricted video (based on Community Guidelines)' IS AN OUTRIGHT BALD-FACED LIE, and constitutes a continuing sex-discrimination motivated hate crime being perpetrated by YouTube.
|
The fact that YouTube has continued its slander of me via its wrongfully Age-restrictions of my videos and by CONTINUING their BLATANTLY and TRANSPARENTLY FALSE, SLANDEROUS and DEFAMATORY ASSERTIONS that their Age-restrictions are based on Community Guidelines (demonstrably false assertions), and despite dispositive proof to the contrary proving that in fact their "Community Guidelines" are not violated by this video, PROVES DISPOSITIVELY THAT THERE ARE HATEFUL BIGOTS BOTH IN YOUTUBE'S MANAGEMENT AND ON YOUTUBE'S MODERATION TEAM(s) (Team YouTube). These age restrictions constitute BLATANTLY HATEFUL and ILLEGAL SEX-DISCRIMINATION based on the fact that the person (me) who is modelling this fully opaque apparel has a gender that does not match the gender-association of the apparel being reviewed - making YouTube's hate-motivated actions violations of law - hate crimes being continuously, unrepentantly and relentlessly perpetrated against me by YouTube for almost a decade.
|
@SvetInTheSky
2 years ago
Great video, combination of colors nice!
1 |