Views : 202,448
Genre: Film & Animation
Date of upload: Jan 9, 2024 ^^
Rating : 4.745 (149/2,191 LTDR)
RYD date created : 2024-05-09T14:19:21.071418Z
See in json
Top Comments of this video!! :3
The shot at 1:16 is the best in the film. Goosebumps!
35 |
Is it really that difficult to hire historical advisors Ridley Scott? This was horrifying to watch, people should see the potential of sticking to the historical sources. Watching films such as Waterloo and War and Peace you catch a real glimpse into the absurd scale battles of the Napoleonic age got to. Honestly, a film focusing entirely on one battle would be ideal; just imagine the brutality of the Battle of Eylau, for example.
251 |
This is like watching glimpses of the real thing. Napoleon enticed his enemies to take a position and through concealment baited them into breaking their line to attack his right.
The importance of the high ground in Austerlitz is that it was initially occupied by the enemy but when the French took it the enemy line was split and open them to defeat in detail. The images here are just glimpses of the real thing.
4 |
I seriously don't know why they couldn't just stick to the actual history of this battle. It's like Ridley Scott wanted to do Eylau, couldn't figure out how to incorporate it into the script, and so decided to set Austerlitz in a snow storm when in reality the battle was fought underneath a bright blue sky.
31 |
The movie is a mess, but the only thing that just drives me crazy is the sound of artillery fire. Simply amazing! 7:48
5 |
No build up to any scene, no attachment to anything, itās just so messy and rushing from one moment to the other with no emotion bond to characters
The battlefields were miles long with 100 of thousands of troops here it seems like itās 500 men against 500
Austerlitz was a masterpiece and Scott managed to make it look like a normal trap..
And most importantly all the best moments of his career are left outā¦
We donāt have any build up to any scenes or battles which makes it impossible to understand what is at stake or any emotions because we have no build up. The music is not emersive or emotional,
Even the love story between Napoleon and Josephine is so blendā¦ one scene they meet, the next he is obsessed in love with her and we donāt know how that happened. There is no connection with any scenes
The example of all this that describes the whole movie you go from a meeting between Russian emperor and Napoleon being friends to next scene Napoleon invading Russia you donāt know why or how it happened, to next scene Napoleon capitulatingā¦
when in between there was so much happening it got me terribly frustrated
it feels like a Wikipedia resumeā¦
For half an hour you ask yourself if Napoleon is just stupid, no charisma nothing when we know he was filled with charisma
then they show Napoleon is just bad at sex and love
The one good thing are the costumes and the color and image of this movie you really feel in the 19th century
I will end with my thought on what should have been done
It should have been done in a trilogy to take time to explain
Doing an entry like in gladiator explaining what happened before and start in his Italy campaign in 1796 which is incredible and no mention of it hereā¦ that really frustrated me.
Also using some epic music and not the none emotion music we had ā¦ maybe Hans Zimmer??
Ending the movie with Napoleonās coronation
Second movie :
First scene starting with the trap for the surrounding of Mackās army by Napoleon and capture of 70.000 men wjth nearly no shots fired
To then The Russians learning about it and being shocked with some epic music and then the build up and preparation to the battle of Austerlitz which was as Napoleon described the best night of his life before the battle where all the soldiers lit torches š„ and yelled Vive lāempereur as he walked through the camp
then following all the epic battles from Jena, Eylau, Friedland to Wagram
And then end with invasion of Russia and leaving us with Napoleon having to take the decision to retreat from Moscow
Third movie : his downfall starting
Explaining the retreat of Russia and the political situation (we all know about it no need to spend long on the thing everyone knows about)
But starting with the war of the 6th coalition and the campaign which was long and with a highlight of the battle of the nations (Leipzig)
AND MOST IMPORTANTLY seeing the campaign to defend France in 1814 which made Napoleon enter even more in the legend defending france with 50.000 men against 600.000 and doing things people would have been more than amazed with
And finishing with a much more epic battle of Waterloo it felt like there was 1000 men on the battlefield when there was 100.000 on each side and end the movie with the defeat at Waterloo
Finishing, explaining how Napoleon ended his life
And no scenes with the Imperial guard šāāļø you can no tell a story on Napoleon without talking about the famous Imperial guard šāāļø
The most iconic troop in history which pissed me off even more
Now conclusion : I am waiting for Spielbergās HBO series on Napoleon more than ever now.
What a disappointment.. I never thought a movie on Napoleon would make me feel so empty and bored ā¦
25 |
@lukethomas.125
4 months ago
āNever interrupted your enemy when he is making a mistakeā
49 |