Views : 886,036
Genre: Science & Technology
Date of upload: Apr 29, 2022 ^^
Rating : 4.95 (618/49,153 LTDR)
RYD date created : 2024-05-15T00:01:53.41934Z
See in json
Top Comments of this video!! :3
The very fact that they took existing specs and rebranded them is just insane. For example, taking USB 3.0 and rebranding it as USB 3.1 Gen 1 and then rebranding that same spec again as USB 3.2 Gen 1. Sure, they claim they are trying to make things more transparent for the consumer with USB4 since it has to be type C and 20gbps or 40gbps but just you wait until they make USB 4 Gen 1x2 or some BS rebranding for an older spec.
2.2K |
Back when I used to edit videos professionally, after each project was completed, I used to render out the final iteration of the video as "final.mp4"
But then I'd spot a mistake and call this one "final2.mp4"
But then the client will ask for a few tweaks; "final2_final"
By the time I'm actually done the file would call itself "final7_finalClient_v6_YesThisIsActuallyFuckingDone.mp4"
I'm guessing USB is going through the same phase
485 |
I think it's important to note at 2:55 there are USB 2.0 Type-C cables so the connection speed could range from 480Mb-40Gbps
107 |
2:56 there is also some USB 2.0 type C, on smartphones for example
And consider that wireless USB was a thing a few years ago...
144 |
@timebomb418
2 years ago
I'm so exited for USB 4.1.2 Gen6 rev3-3 Mk2_final_final. It finally clears up the confusion between 4.1.1 Gen5 rev3-2 α6 and it's predecessors. The handy comparison chart is wonderful, and doubles as wallpaper; 6.5 posters completely covers your average room! Though seriously I think switching to a unified color scheme might be the best solution for consumers, most people could ignore the technobabble entirely: I plug into the yellow one for power, because yellow is electricity color. Also I thought that the red ports were for bios recovery or something similar?
2.6K |