ImmersiveAmbientModecolor: #d6cdd2 (color 1)
Video Format : 22 (720p) openh264 ( https://github.com/cisco/openh264) mp4a.40.2 | 44100Hz
Audio Format: Opus - Normalized audio
PokeTubeEncryptID: 98c71ec5d6d40d84197b206e252286ebe51249c7ede439bf72fbdeb1fef380e73bb87c13ea00d408ded67060709f97a4
Proxy : eu-proxy.poketube.fun - refresh the page to change the proxy location
Date : 1715324202954 - unknown on Apple WebKit
Mystery text : V2Jtem1wZW9jQ1UgaSAgbG92ICB1IGV1LXByb3h5LnBva2V0dWJlLmZ1bg==
143 : true
143,195 Views âą Jan 8, 2024 âą Click to toggle off description
Views : 143,195
Genre: Pets & Animals
Date of upload: Jan 8, 2024 ^^
Rating : 4.686 (191/2,246 LTDR)
RYD date created : 2024-05-09T14:03:02.565631Z
See in json
YouTube Comments - 308 Comments
Top Comments of this video!! :3
No matter how complex even just the description is Itâs learning something. Thx
8 |
Great vid but it is cut off. I would like to see the rest of the lecture. Is it available somewhere?
7 |
My cerebrum just got entangled with my cerebellum.
3 |
Love this lecture, but would like to hear more.....
2 |
Spooky will remain spooky
2 |
I truly enjoyed this gentleman explanation. He was very clear every single point what he was saying, yes it is true entanglement is true and it happens every single second in our environment. Due to entanglement molecules are forming, and lightnings are sticking, due to entanglement noise is traveling through the atmosphere, thatâs all the work of entanglement. In some directions noise travels farther away some directions you wonât hear a thing , what it tells you that? It tells me atoms are functioning exactly identical, just way you see in magnetism when you stuck magnets together you can take that away round our solar system. Entanglement will continue as long as atoms are within close proximity. One single hydrogen atom has ability to influence about little over half inch. Can you imagine microscopic hydrogen atom has influence of that much distance. When atoms absorb heat they expand to maximum distance to release the heat thatâs when they get locked within other atoms to create molecules.
1 |
Entanglement doesnât have to imply faster than light communication between two entangled particles (spooky action). Entanglement can be a process of synchronizing the two particlesâ underlying quantum fluctuations. Although still random, once separated the particles are now fluxing in harmony and when measured at the same instant they thus yield correlated properties with no communication needed. Analogous to a random number generator with the same seed on independent computers, yielding a pattern of identical random values- if one computer is measured at time T you will know the value generated at T on the 2nd.
|
Susskind has the gift of rendering everything perfectly confusing while seemingy being crystal-clear đ€
22 |
The last comment about entanglement with regions in space ... đ„đ§ đ„
5 |
Great find, Professor Leonard Susskind gives some of the best lectures!
15 |
Woah. Heavy I've read other stuff about entanglement before, but this is the first time I've realised that conponents of spin in 3D /have/ to be +-1, with no sinning and cossing, even though the spin can be in any direction
1 |
Wow holy cow. That gave me one of the deepest insights into quantum mechanics I've ever had. I literally felt it the moment it hit me.
6 |
Wonderful lecture! (I wish somebody had had the good sense to clip his mic to his lapel to avoid the loud mic pops when he reads while looking down.)
|
Thank you Leonard. 'and if you had gone further mathematically, you would have found a wave function relating the two entangled systems right? You would have discovered Schrodinger's equation.
What is the physical meaning of this relationship? I propose there can be only one answer. There has to be two waves, 180 degrees out of phase, such that the value at any point in time of one of the waves is always equal to the negative slope of the curve, (wave) of the other wave at the same point in time.
You need one more aspect. You need to imagine the first wave as "real", but the second wave as "imaginary" in some sense.
This is the only way you can get the Schrodinger relationship.
I know this seems to be a stab at it, a random guess, but I have spent many years investigating the nature of time and have arrived at this "picture" from basic logic and it happens to fit QM exactly.
My starting point is that time is wavelike, it is an energy field that powers everything in a wavelike manner. Let's say it is an energy field throughout the cosmos that provides energy in a wavelike manner, such that time, (or events), proceeds into the "future" faster then slower, then faster then slower, then,..... well, you get the picture.
How do I know that time is a wave? Because light is a wave. I.e. photons are emitted in waves from any light source at any point in space. I take the emission of a photon as an event and so deduce that the rate of events is wavelike. (Many more photons are emitted during the peaks of the wave than are emitted at the troughs).
The rate of time is wavelike. The energy available to power all events is wavelike.
See my paper on "academia dot edu", Ken Hughes, "Time is a wave". There are nine more papers following on from this, presenting a theory that explains many things in physics including the conundrums we still face today.
In a nut shell, we live in a "Binary Universe", where there is an exact negative duplicate of all positive energy at all times. This immediately answers two important questions. 1. Why the energy of the universe is a net zero, and 2. Why CPT Symmetry is a fundamental law of nature.
But there is much more.
I'll leave it there.
1 |
love it
3 |
In this day (and age), it would be wonderful if the lecturers could have microphones properly positioned by the "techs" anticipating their movements. The subject matter is difficult enough without the lousy audio.
1 |
that was just getting interesting...
where is the next bit? entanglement of regions of space????
1 |
â€Thank you very much
|
Wow, I had no idea Mike was moonlighting as a physicist when he wasnât working for Gus.
2 |
@PrometheusZandski
4 months ago
Thank you so much. I can stay up all night listening to Prof Susskind.
34 |