Views : 1,438,436
Genre: People & Blogs
Date of upload: Premiered Jul 25, 2022 ^^
Rating : 4.933 (523/30,620 LTDR)
RYD date created : 2024-05-13T16:43:07.687343Z
See in json
Top Comments of this video!! :3
Knowing about early synapsids still baffles me. I'm used to thinking since I was a child that reptiles basically ruled the land and our ancestors only got a chance when the dinosaurs died out so it's still a pretty wild idea that our ancestors (or those our ancestors are related to) were the dominant group before even the dinosaurs.
283 |
I'd love to see series on
the evolution of arthropodes
- Insects
- Arachnids and consort
- Crustacean
- You name it (probably missed some)..
The evolution of mollusks
- shelled vs non shelled.. why and how...
- gasteropods, cephalopods, bivalves
Also a video about the emergence of symmetry (axial, bilateral - notion of up and down/head and tail - evolutionary advantage of each strategy) in the Animalia kingdom, and the evolution of non-symmetric animals (sponge, corals..) and how symmetry emerged ? (Jellyfish ?)
140 |
when i was a kid i was obsessed with animals, i wanted to be a vet or a marine biologist or a dog trainer or a herpetologist or a conservationist, list goes on and on. as a result, i used to get tons of nonfiction books as christmas and birthday gifts, huge encyclopedias and hardcover treasure troves of information. but i was so so young that i enjoyed moreso the concept of these books than actually being able to appreciate all the information, and unfortunately i had to donate almost every single one in high school, with the thought process that my childhood animal-dreams were dead. this video is so close to those euphoric memories i had of reading through all those books, except now as an adult it actually makes way more sense and is. honestly that much more fun. thank you so much for giving that back to me and reminding me how important it is and was to me
7 |
It's really illuminating to have all the clades mentioned, with selected illustrations. Because otherwise, I think it's too easy to settle into our easy memory of the big or charming mammals, like tigers, rabbits, armadillos, bears, kangaroos, beavers, antelope, platypus, lions, boars, zebras, sloths, elephants, bats, giraffes, moles, rhinos, foxes, anteaters, porcupines, monkeys and whales. In other words, all the animals that get a place of honor in childhood media programming because they lend themselves to caricature for graphic images and personality for animated cartoons.
But those media ignore the beauty and intrigue of rare, unexpected and less familiar species of the enormous mammalian evolutionary tree. Consequently, even adults with PhDs in mathematics or chemistry might not know the difference between the sugar glider, flying squirrel and fruit bat, and how distant or different their origins. The distinctions we easily absorbed about dinosaurs, thanks to great books and movies about them, haven't been extended to the general grasp of equivalent distinctions in mammalian evolution. Most people, for example, assume seals, manatees and whales are closely related, which is far from the case. The reasons they have dramatically different ancestry are utterly fascinating, and yet the evolutionary history of mammals are probably far less understood by the supposedly educated public than are dinosaurs, living reptiles or birds. How many kids or science-literate adults can confidently describe the differences between monotremes, marsupials and placentals? Probably far fewer than those who can explain the pterosaur, ichthyosaur, dinosaur divide.
And that ignorance begins with widespread unfamiliarity about the earliest branching of synapsids and sauropsids, far earlier in the history of terrestrial animals than almost anyone understands--many millions of years before dinosaurs thundered over the Earth, or into our imaginations, or across modern movie screens! The film and book industry really should see the mammals' story, in the Cenozoic especially, as the goldmine it could be for educational textbook and entertainment creativity. Oh, and perhaps museum collections, university graduate programs and research grants, as well?
78 |
Fun Fact: Placentia is a bit of a misnomer because the Marsupials also use a placenta. The difference is in the length of time the babies remain in the womb and stage of development when they're born. Placentals keep the baby in the womb much longer than marsupials and have a much more developed placenta.
26 |
@navrongo3524
1 year ago
Periodically referring back to a family tree would have been very helpful for orientation. Good video.
585 |