ImmersiveAmbientModecolor: #f2f0ea (color 2)
Video Format : 22 (720p) openh264 ( https://github.com/cisco/openh264) mp4a.40.2 | 44100Hz
Audio Format: Opus - Normalized audio
PokeTubeEncryptID: a65dea4a14454d2da8f0077d589caf5b65460882864f98e66951848e01bf2b5296bbc59c81096d6f5c8f356a5a135a49
Proxy : eu-proxy.poketube.fun - refresh the page to change the proxy location
Date : 1715718837011 - unknown on Apple WebKit
Mystery text : TjluNEh3Wm4zcGsgaSAgbG92ICB1IGV1LXByb3h5LnBva2V0dWJlLmZ1bg==
143 : true
19,547 Views ā¢ Dec 21, 2020 ā¢ Click to toggle off description
For more about Sean, visit lhim.org/
Also, check out the How We Got the Bible class: Ā Ā Ā ā¢Ā 1Ā TheĀ MasoreticĀ TextĀ Ā
Views : 19,547
Genre: Education
Date of upload: Dec 21, 2020 ^^
Rating : 4.44 (70/430 LTDR)
RYD date created : 2022-01-19T09:21:20.301419Z
See in json
YouTube Comments - 99 Comments
Top Comments of this video!! :3
I actually like the capitalization and the italics. It's good to read the introduction to any Bible translation to see what is utilized as a tool.
9 |
Thank you for this great review!! What is your preferred Bible translation? Thank you
2 |
I'll be 49 next week and in my 30 years of apologetics I've never heard anyone ever say capitalizing pronouns when referring to God is weird. You're the first.
15 |
Very clear and argumented presentation. Thank you very much for your work.
5 |
What is your preffered english translation and why? I personally love the Nasb95.
1 |
It's always good to have another translation around. I would say I split 50/50 between the Christian Standard Bible in the NASB 95 and 2020. I just got a giant super giant print version of it and so far I love it I'm reading through the Psalms with it
6 |
I donāt see the complaint around the 15:30 mark. The double brackets let me know itās not there but keeps the flow, especially if someone is reading from a TR based text.
1 |
I personally love the capitals to distinguish! Great review. Now I will definitely be upgrading. Iāve not been interested in all my NASBās, but now Iām interested. The Westcott & Hort.
10 |
Beautiful discussion, Sean. Thank you and may God, Yahweh continue to give us wisdom. God bless us...
3 |
As a former KJV person I actually like the block verses look more than paragraphs. It was one of the main reasons I chose the NASB over the NRSV
14 |
So the niv or 2020?
2 |
Thank you for the video, Sean. Your access to the sources is a service that most cannot provide in a review.
I preach from the 1995, and I feel likeāeven though I enjoy the 2020 personally and read it to my kidsāI cannot use it for preaching because of the philosophy of gender accuracy. There are some obnoxious instances of GA where the translation just grinds on me, Romans 9:20 for example. But more importantly, I donāt want to have to defend the GA philosophy to the congregation, knowing that theyāre mostly going to view it as a cultural capitulation.
The biggest change (IMHO) with the 2020, compared to the previous editions, is not the translation; itās the target audience. Because of this, the NASB has abandoned its niche and joined the back of the line in another. Furthermore, by catering to those who are less familiar with the Bible, Lockman is unintentionally alienating its older constituency, the ones who instinctively ājust knowā that man refers to mankind.
Also, I have grown to love all those āNASBisms.ā Perhaps they could be more creative with OT quotes, though nobody should reasonably think that itās yelling at them if theyāve read the front matter. Maybe an alternative font, right-justifying the text, or using bold could be a solution.
Again, I honestly appreciate your work here. God bless you, brother.
17 |
CSB vs NASB 2020?
3 |
What resources would you recommend for somebody who wants to begin learning about textual criticism and/or biblical accuracy?
|
What do you think of the NASB 2020 translation of "monogenes theos" in John 1:18 as "God the Only Son", versus in the NASB 1995 as "the Only Begotten God"?
In James White's "The Forgotten Trinity", he compared several translations, and "God the Only Son" was also in the NRSV and said this was preferable, but that "the only Son, who is God" is the best way to translate it and maintain the word order. He references Harris, "Jesus as God", pp 88-92, for a longer discussion on this translation. I thought this was interesting.
2 |
With your comments on God's name Yahweh not being correctly translated, The Legacy Standard Bible (Final Revision of NASB95) has done so! The LSB, which MacArthur & the Master's Seminary/University have worked on, are using Yahweh instead of LORD. Praise God!
5 |
I used the NASB95 until I obtained the Legacy Standard Bible. It is really good.
1 |
No problem with Capital OT quotes or italics as am used to them and also the preface to NASB explains it.
But i strongly agree that publishing part need a fresh mind and some lessons learned from such as Holman, for i was browsing their store and all i see is large print, paragraph format, mono color verse numbers &c.
2 |
I think capitalization pertaining to God and Jesus should be made it is show of respect
4 |
@davidjs74
1 year ago
I was totally against the revision until I started reading the NASB2020 for myself. I really like it!
30 |