High Definition Standard Definition Theater
Video id : Ay5vZDrfv_0
ImmersiveAmbientModecolor: #d5cfcf (color 2)
Video Format : 22 (720p) openh264 ( https://github.com/cisco/openh264) mp4a.40.2 | 44100Hz
Audio Format: Opus - Normalized audio
PokeTubeEncryptID: ab89178023dadd84c3cc0950218e4fd9987847c81dca99aa1049f3ea7980af1293f76e18ecfa2a6fc83d9394698a022a
Proxy : eu-proxy.poketube.fun - refresh the page to change the proxy location
Date : 1715764238953 - unknown on Apple WebKit
Mystery text : QXk1dlpEcmZ2XzAgaSAgbG92ICB1IGV1LXByb3h5LnBva2V0dWJlLmZ1bg==
143 : true
"Jeffing the Ineffable: Ultimate Reality, Paul Tillich, and Naturalism" with Jeff Speaks
Jump to Connections
80 Views β€’ Mar 18, 2024 β€’ Click to toggle off description
How does one coherently speak about the ineffable? Was Paul Tillich a religious naturalist? This week, I talk with the ever stupendous Jeff Speaks about metaphysics, apophaticism, the complexities of naturalist theology, and how to best characterize Tillich's theological lens. This is an especially relevant episode for any one who, like Jeff and myself, thirsts for a philosophically informed spiritual framework but rejects supernaturalism.


Jeff Speaks is a PhD Candidate at Boston University School of Theology studying theology, philosophy, and ethics.
Metadata And Engagement

Views : 80
Genre: Nonprofits & Activism
Date of upload: Mar 18, 2024 ^^


Rating : 5 (0/5 LTDR)
RYD date created : 2024-03-19T21:38:13.922851Z
See in json
Tags
Connections
Nyo connections found on the description ;_; report a issue lol

YouTube Comments - 8 Comments

Top Comments of this video!! :3

@BYTE-GEIST

1 month ago

For a deep dive on theology and culture, click here ----> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sx0BbMZA1wM

|

@user-tr2hn4bm5t

1 month ago

I appreciate the transition from a discussion of religious naturalism to one of the relatability of Tillich's writing. I think this is a great progression of dialogue in two parts that I've never considered before: I. Religious naturalism is readily grasped as a concept because it deals in the relatable, opting for the nature around us in lieu of a sense of the supernatural. II. Tillich is relatable because the meaning of his writing isn't stowed away in some sort of semantic labyrinth; it's raw and therefore unadulterated by overly academic or pedantic speech. I think that in this light, the further we stray from what's always present in our contexts as humans---our perceptions of nature, or the unfiltered thoughts we share, for example---the more difficult an applicable thesis is to ascertain. There's an ongoing attempt to render everything technically explicable and causal to any other number of things, but maybe this process is often in ill service to philosophy as a whole.

2 |

@trevork9569

1 month ago

I found the variety of religious naturalism very interesting. It is interesting how people with different religious backgrounds can have similar views on the power of nature, and sometimes actually worship it.

1 |

@BYTE-GEIST

1 month ago

Some Time Stamps 7:35 What is religious naturalism? 9:33 Is Paul Tillich a religious naturalist?

2 |

@BYTE-GEIST

1 month ago

34:00 anthropomorphic language and God

1 |

@BYTE-GEIST

1 month ago

5:20 Is Paul Tillich the Cat in the Hat?

2 |

@matthewparlato5626

1 month ago

Dr. John Vervaeke seems relevant

1 |

Go To Top