Views : 3,432
Genre: Entertainment
Date of upload: Apr 4, 2023 ^^
Rating : 4.954 (2/172 LTDR)
RYD date created : 2023-06-06T23:40:02.611305Z
See in json
Top Comments of this video!! :3
Dear Tim,
Thank you for always providing content with a kind, gentle, and caring perspective. I am not a conservative Christian, yet I am a subscriber of your channel because I can count on your views being expressed in a coherent, rational, and yet kind way. I watch every video because it is important in my life to be loving and to understand my Christian brothers and sisters who are conservative.
In understanding where you and they are coming from, I hopefully keep myself from falling into a hole of judgement and hatred. At one time during the pandemic I was definitely there, but thanks to mainly the grace of God Iâve learned to feel compassion and to achieve a level of some understanding. Not always, but most of the time. So thank you so much for what you contribute here.
I have family members and neighbors who believe the same way you do, yet who express their views with great venom, and interspersed with sentiments of hatred, hyperbole, wrath, and wild and bizarre accusations. Sometimes even cursing, war-language, imprecatory language, etc. It is scary to me and I canât find what is in it (if anything) that reflects Christ. The hardest thing is that I know they are believers yet they donât see that their behavior is not reflecting who they say their Savior is. They really have no idea.
I have been following Rosario for years (since her conversion) and have read two of her books. I cringed when I read her article, which seems ostensibly about her desire to publicly repent, yet to me it seems even more like a call to action to encourage others to debate this topic and to perhaps join in some sort of movement to call transgendered people by their birth pronoun rather than their preferred pronoun. She attacks so many people in this article, she calls out so many divergent perspectives on the gospel; she is certain she is right. And indeed, she may be right! But the tone of this article is dramatic and pronounced and so intensely negative it canât be missed.
The article actually made me sick. Iâve been thinking about this ever since you posted it and finally felt like I could write about it. I read all of the comments too. I wish people could see that if you ARE rightâ100% rightâyet you cannot express your views with loveâor anything even approaching loveâyou are at best diluting your message and at worst turning people off to the gospel. You also may be deceiving yourself about your motives. It is a sad and sorry thing.
Just some general comments, not about this specific video and article: I do think that if people would take some time and pray before posting they might post differently. I mean really, really prayâlabor in prayerâ give it a few days or weeks or even monthsâthey might come out sounding not quite so ugly. Too, I think sometimes people think that young folks are leaving the faith because they love immorality or hate the truth or are groomed and corrupted, when actually it could be that they just are looking for Jesus and donât see Him in what is being presented to them.
At any rate, thanks for all you do to not be a clanging symbol, but to represent the gospel as it was intended. It has made a great difference to me!
5 |
Mr Frisch, thanks for the video on this. Yes, I believe it is a sin to knowingly use pronouns that do not reflect God's biological design, it is a clear instance of honoring man over God. I agree with all of Mrs. Butterfield's points. Honestly, this might be the best public repentance I've seen in a long time.
5 |
I agree with it. A shame that so many popular denominations are catering to this falsity. They need to repent too. Many local churches are disassociated with them over this very issue. The reasons for their capitulation are either in ignorance of evil or simply cowardice. Nonetheless, no one who truly loves God should be bowing down to this evil movement. "Fear of man is a snare."
2 |
Never heard of anyone in the article, but found Laura Perry Smalts testimony on YouTube with footage of her marriage and husband's comments. Made me cry - woman that I am. Testimonies of God's saving His people and their profound gratitude are very encouraging. Thanks for your info on these people.
1 |
Thanks for sharing this. I think that was very appropriate and well done of her. I completely agree that using transgender pronouns is a sin. I always thought so because it is lying or bearing false witness and denying Godâs design in creation. I hadnât thought about some of the other reasons she listed.
I also agree that genuine hospitality, love, and compassion cannot exist outside of or in opposition to truth. We are called to love our neighbors, but we do not get to decide what love is. God has already defined love. We donât get to redefine it based on our current cultural whims.
I pray that more people will come to the same realization that she did and that they will also publicly repent if they have publicly sinned in advocating for the use of transgender pronouns. Courage is contagious, and many Christians today desperately need the courage to stand up for and be proud of what God has designed and declared rather than what men are demanding, and I include myself in that. Itâs not easy to speak the truth when people are attacking you for it. May God grant us all boldness in declaring His truths before all men.
5 |
So, thrilled that someone who God healed from struggling with gender identity has finally spoken truthfully on this subject. I am always shocked when I hear Christians honoring transgender pronoun usage while also claiming that transgenderism is a sin toward acknowledging God as Creator. One cannot believe one thing while still honoring the other. Using non-biological pronouns is the same as co-signing their sin. It is NOT loving because it keeps them comfortable in their sin and possibly hinders the convicting work of the Holy in the life of one who is struggling with identity issues. The hypocrisy of using pronouns contrary to someone's biology should be clearly evident to those called as revelators of God's truth. One can and should remain uncompromisingly truthful without being graceless and unkind--even if the response to their response is false accusation.
Jesus taught us this challenging reality:
BLESSED are you when they revile and persecute you, and say all kinds of evil against you falsely for My sake. Rejoice and be exceedingly glad, for great is your reward in heaven, for so they persecuted the prophets who were before you. (Matthew 5:11-12)
Sadly, many believers have become more concerned over the optic of not being perceived by the culture as loving and kind rather than facing the challenge of truly demonstrating love and kindness even to our own hurt. using pragmaticism they attempt to attract more flies through arsenic laced honey. But it is NEVER kind to nurture keeping anyone enslaved to their sin. Voddie Baucham is certainly correct when he stated that niceness has become the newest fruit of the Spirit.
2 |
Thanks for sharing this. I will not argue with anyone about how they refer to themselves. As for me, I will refer to everyone by the gender of origin if that is known. Unfortunately, we are at a point where there are many occasions you don't know a person has undergone a gender identification change. I'm not stressing it, because there's nothing new under the sun. God has a plan and in the end every knee will bow and every tongue will confess that He is LORD. Keep showing love and God will do the rest in His time. đ
4 |
I'll comment on this with my own perspective, stating upfront that I am transgender and I do not have spiritual beliefs (I came to this channel from the discussion upon Adam Neely's video on CCM). Further upfront, I make no claim to have a deep understanding of the bible nor any other religious text, though I do believe myself to be something who understands cogent arguments on an intellectual level, even if I am not personally persuaded by them or even if I do not accept their premises.
All that to say, from the video, article, and comments, I do not understand those who claim that using the language someone chooses to refer to themselves through as a lie / an affront. Truthfully, and somewhat presumptuously, I find from what I am seeing, this is a matter of personal opinion (i.e. "I do not like / believe in the concept of 'transgenerism'") which has been justified as a moral imperative via the claim it is in line with scripture teachings.
I saw someone in these comments say they would not use the term "transgender" because they did not believe it existed. This is simply baffling to me, and seems in line with the very "erasure of truth" the article comments upon, filtered through the lens of personal opinion. I, as a non-believer in higher entities, have no reason to avoid referring to Christians or capital-g God because I do not believe in the gospel of Christianity nor that a captial-g God exists. I would find the mere assertion of such to be an idea which is baffling. I do not believe in Christianity, but Christianity is a belief system which exists and Christian is a self-definition which people use; I am not validating nor admitting the gospel of (capital-c) Christ is something which is truthful by using such with my language.
Further, I think the idea that acknowledging a concept does not "admit / validate" belief in that concept holds in general for Christianity in general, and is not applied to concepts outside of transgenderism. For instance, my understanding is that it would be a non-controversial statement to say that, factually, a vast majority of Christians would consider Islam to be a categorically false belief. Does it, then, mean one is lying if they were to say Islam is a belief which is held by people?
My point, which is admittedly obtuse, is such: I see this idea that refusing to use "Transgender Pronouns" as an overriding of personal opinion justified with spurious quoting of Christian tenants. That is to say, it doesn't seem to follow from the examples of justification given as something which is sinful to do; rather it seems like a desire to avoid topics one finds personally uncomfortable.
That is my two cents as a non-Biblical-scholar. I am interested in responses that might explain my thinking to the contrary.
2 |
@DearWokeChristian
1 year ago
I am glad she repented and changed her position. Yes I believe it's a sin and RB made the choice to call herself out.
18 |