Views : 29,538
Genre: Entertainment
Date of upload: Mar 30, 2024 ^^
Rating : 4.991 (1/436 LTDR)
RYD date created : 2024-05-07T12:00:00.111295Z
See in json
Top Comments of this video!! :3
Wondered if there had ever been an archaeological investigation of the battle site.Thought provoking documentary.Hope there has been a full metal detection survey of what is believed to be the battlefield.Which i understand has been done on a Middleages English battle site.Also what provided imformation relating to the much earlier battle site of the Tutenburgher Forest per the silver baggage cart or carts.
|
So now we are suggesting medieval french and English recorders can count. Most English troops rarely got paid and would have foraged for food, so financial records will give little clue, also they were decimated by diseases. The french army would have grown as it marched as it always did ,Yet here is some one centuries later trying to re write it,
|
... šµšµ...""ā¦ YOUR GOING HOME IN A š“ó §ó ¢ó „ó ®ó §ó æ AMBULANCE... ""šµšµ 4:29
3 |
I get really sick of this modern interpretation that the armies were evenly matched and that, essentially, the English were lucky! No! The French still massively outnumbered the English, and, on their own soil, they were outwitted, out flanked and utterly beaten by a stronger, mightier for of less men!
English historians need to step up and stop being so Leftish about their history. England were a force to be reckoned with. They were a tiny island capable of immense power, throughout written history. It is simply wrong to diminish and dumb that down on the precepts of political correctness.
History has happened. Atrocity happens. War is evil, yet The English are simply not the villains theyāre portrayed to be in the grand scheme of things and people would do well to study history the world over before making assumptions based on modern interpretation.
Itās very easy for the magician to point the finger to the audience, while simultaneously hiding the truth from those absorbed in the show.
12 |
Aah... not the myth of the arrow storm again ,c'mon guys stop copying. A letter written after the battle of Formingy by Charlie 7 discovered in 1968 tells us the English like to shoot at the feet.....well where else do you aim at 25 yards....a shield???
The longbow was not an offensive weapon, it was like the WW1 watercooled machinegun a defensive weapon and Henry relied on being attacked. The French obliged. If you need to know the answer to arrow v armour examine the battle of Patay 1429. 1500 mounted French knghts and Gen d'armes charged 5000 English bowmen who were caught in the open totaly destroying the capability of the corps of bowmen for any future engagement.
The Butchers bill was 150 French dead and 2500 English dead, this in spite of 40,000 longbow arrows fired at short range.
The Longbow has it's limitations against plate and shield. In the final battle at Castillon where we were sent back to the channel ports to collect our duty free the longbow was hardly used.
2 |
@steveingram5264
2 weeks ago
We should be proud of our history if we don't look back we can't go forward,š“ó §ó ¢ó „ó ®ó §ó æš“ó §ó ¢ó ³ó £ó “ó 暬š§š“ó §ó ¢ó ·ó ¬ó ³ó æ
3 |