PokeVideoPlayer v23.9-app.js-aug2025_
0143ab93_videojs8_1563605_YT_2d24ba15 licensed under gpl3-or-later
ImmersiveAmbientModecolor: #c09d85 (color 2)
Video Format : 136 (720p) mp4 | h264 | 44100Hz | 1084809 bps
Audio Format: 140 (AUDIO_QUALITY_MEDIUM) m4a | aac | 44100hz | STEREO(2channels)
PokeEncryptID: 3eec7a3b27e971d768d001aa826d9e717534d5181665c1d06964143267035e3faf55c0938e697fbf543d9aee36bee7b9
Proxy/Companion URL : woke-proxy.
Date : 1760227177553 - unknown on Apple WebKit
Mystery text?? : d0swN0tMREpZNWMgaSAgbG92ICB1IHdva2UtcHJveHkucG9rZXR1YmUuZnVu
143 : true
1 Views β’ 5 months ago β’ Click to toggle off description
We know the Son and the Spirit are God equal with the Father, because of the names, attributes, works, and worship that are given to them. The Son is Yahweh. But there is a real distinction between Father, Son, and Spirit. The Father is NOT the Son, the Son is NOT the Spirit, and the Spirit is NOT the Father. The Son is eternally begotten form the Father, and the Spirit proceeds from both the Father and the Son.
#theology #god #trinity #truth #christianity #apologetics #faith #christianfaith #christiantheology #christianityexplained
Views : 1
Genre: Nonprofits & Activism
License: Standard YouTube License
Uploaded At 5 months ago ^^
warning: returnyoutubedislikes may not be accurate, this is just an estiment ehe :3
Rating : 0 (0/0 LTDR)
0% of the users lieked the video!!
0% of the users dislieked the video!!
User score: 0.00- Overwhelmingly Negative
RYD date created : 2025-04-18T17:01:23.594056Z
See in json
166 Comments
Top Comments of this video!! :3
The holy trinity is indeed a trinity. 3
2 | 1
100% agree!
1 | 0
The misunderstanding is basic math. 1 + 1+ 1 = 3, not one. Baisc math proves the trinity false... 3 distinct persons are not 1.
See John 17 if you want to understand that Jesus came so we can be one with Him the same as he is one with the Father. This happens when we do the will of the Father like Jesus did. Being one with God is to do the will of the Father, and through the Holy Ghost, we can know the will of the Father.
1 | 27
The issue is not with the Persons of the trinity. LDS accept the persons of the trinity. the issue is with the concept of 'ousios' or con substantial. This is a greek philo of sharing the same substance...making them one God despite being 3 persons (Gods)
1 | 43
Do they believe their own literature like D&C 20:28?
| 0
Chrisazure; please explain.
| 0
That makes absolutely no sense
| 1
This video proves absolutely nothing about the trinity.
| 1
Latter Day Saints have no problem that the Father, Son and Holy Ghost are one God because they three form one Godhead. But they are three distinct beings and persons, not three persons that are the same being. Thatβs a philosophical nonsense.
| 16
The father is jesus and jesus is the flesh manifestation of himself and the spirit is also the sprituel manifestation of himsekf whixh is also withing jesus most of the time. There is only one distinct person in three forms.
| 2
I think that God is beyond understanding. we can only accept what it says about God. We see that in the bible, the Father, the Spirit & the Son are all credited with raising Christ from the grave. if all 3 raised Him, then all 3 had the ability to do so and only God has the ability to raise from the dead.
But as far as LDS goes, if God is made of Flesh and Bone, Does the Father still have his genitalia intact? If so, Blood flow to that organ is necessary for inter-coarse. So since LDS believe that Gods are constantly procreating with each other, then do the physical sperm and physical egg create a spiritual baby? how does all of this work?
i think if you want to pretend to be confused about Christian understanding, then you should have some pretty deep theological discussions about the LDS God. This is a man with no blood that is constantly having sex with multiple wives in order to produce babies made out of immaterial spirit...
is gestation still 9 months? are spirit babies born in litters? or is it one at a time, 9 months at a time? answer these embarrassingly absurd questions and we can have a discussion about the being of God and how He is incomprehensible.
2 | 5
@chrisazure1624
5 months ago
I am reading the BOM for polemical reasons. I realize that 2 Nephi talks about Crucifixion that wasn't known about in the alledged Nephi's time. Doesn't describe it at all. It presumes it is known about.
Another anacronism.
8 | 28