A precedent-setting SCOTUS ruling for The Slants found that even disparaging names can secure trade

Stats For Nerds

Video id : vgaRDgssUWs
ImmersiveAmbientModecolor: #cfbc9e (color 2)
Video Format : 136 (608p) mp4 | h264 | 44100Hz | 1208803 bps
Audio Format: 140 (AUDIO_QUALITY_MEDIUM) m4a | aac | 44100hz | STEREO(2channels)
PokeEncryptID: 6c03c1eddd3d07c375cea27f306d15c01f3bc1b52f8474e551d57b46d8f87f4d5771b3a1f04cfbf96520bf3f336c89e2
Proxy/Companion URL : woke-proxy.
Date : 1760054262862 - unknown on Apple WebKit
Mystery text?? : dmdhUkRnc3NVV3MgaSAgbG92ICB1IHdva2UtcHJveHkucG9rZXR1YmUuZnVu
143 : true

Jump to Connections

Vivek Jayaram

2.16K subs

Download

PokeTranslate

217 Views • 2 months ago • Click to toggle off description

open dyslexic mode

Revisiting this landmark SCOTUS case that changed trademark law forever!
***
Asian rock band "The Slants" wanted to trademark their name, but the U.S. Patent Office rejected their application, calling the name "disparaging."
The Slants fought the case all the way to the Supreme Court, which sided with the band. The court said that banning disparaging trademarks violated the First Amendment. For better or worse, this one case opened the floodgates for a new set of words and phrases to be trademarked.
#Repost #TheSlants #MusicLaw #IP

Metadata And Engagement

Views : 217
Genre: Sports
License: Standard YouTube License

Uploaded At 2 months ago ^^
warning: returnyoutubedislikes may not be accurate, this is just an estiment ehe :3
Rating : 5 (0/9 LTDR)

100.00% of the users lieked the video!!
0.00% of the users dislieked the video!!
User score: 100.00- Masterpiece Video

RYD date created : 2025-08-20T01:12:53.957309Z
See in json

Connections

0 Comments