PokeVideoPlayer v23.9-app.js-aug2025_
0143ab93_videojs8_1563605_YT_2d24ba15 licensed under gpl3-or-later
ImmersiveAmbientModecolor: #ba918a (color 2)
Video Format : 136 (606p) mp4 | h264 | 44100Hz | 1551012 bps
Audio Format: 140 (AUDIO_QUALITY_MEDIUM) m4a | aac | 44100hz | STEREO(2channels)
PokeEncryptID: a8b3144c87c2618b9b7598c4be640c15372ebca43ed6e7c9fb4e9fd62e361e16f31c5c70ff51d7f06a2cc17d6da3279b
Proxy/Companion URL : woke-proxy.
Date : 1759778644699 - unknown on Apple WebKit
Mystery text?? : dGNZbzJPdEVvZTggaSAgbG92ICB1IHdva2UtcHJveHkucG9rZXR1YmUuZnVu
143 : true
194,196 Views ā¢ 1 year ago ā¢ Click to toggle off description
Join this channel to get access to perks:
youtube.com/channel/UCYeF244yNGuFefuFKqxIAXw/join
Subscribe for regular science videos: bit.ly/RiSubscRibe
The Ri is on Twitter: twitter.com/ri_science
and Facebook: www.facebook.com/royalinstitution
and TikTok: www.tiktok.com/@ri_science
Listen to the Ri podcast: podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/ri-science-podcast
Donate to the RI and help us bring you more lectures: www.rigb.org/support-us/donate-ri
Our editorial policy: www.rigb.org/editing-ri-talks-and-moderating-commeā¦
Subscribe for the latest science videos: bit.ly/RiNewsletter
Product links on this page may be affiliate links which means it won't cost you any extra but we may earn a small commission if you decide to purchase through the link.
Views : 194,196
Genre: Science & Technology
License: Standard YouTube License
Uploaded At 1 year ago ^^
warning: returnyoutubedislikes may not be accurate, this is just an estiment ehe :3
Rating : 4.763 (400/6,362 LTDR)
94.08% of the users lieked the video!!
5.92% of the users dislieked the video!!
User score: 91.12- Overwhelmingly Positive
RYD date created : 2024-12-20T13:38:45.336478Z
See in json
125 Comments
Top Comments of this video!! :3
I really like calling an equation a āLittle concrete poemā
40 | 0
Iād soak up any of his lectures, and for a brief moment feel minutely brighter !
43 | 1
This is one of the coolest shorts I've ever seen in my entire life. Physics has been my side passion ever since I majored in college. I never got to finish that degree but learning to see the world like a physicist changed my life
3 | 0
Yes, but the equations are models, and sometimes that is forgotten and we just assume that everywhere they lead is correct. You have to check.
40 | 5
I think we can boil this down to; "once you find out the rules of how one thing works, you can extrapolate."
4 | 1
Mathematicians are amazing what they can do. They can walk into any field any discipline and use math for almost anything. Amazing work
| 0
This is actually kind of an incredible idea. To learn more, understand what we already know.
| 0
The math and the universe are truly beautiful, I only wish I were smart enough to understand either.
2 | 1
I have a little gripe with that and please feel free to shred it to pieces anyone - the equation is a representation of something that already exists! So the physical reality knew or rather has everything intrinsically we just discover it and explain it to others. Just this episode of Closer to Truth by Robert L Kuhn keeps coming back to me - Is Math and beauty intrinsic or imposed?
| 0
The most important 3 degrees of motion in human history is that Newton put it together, and when you do what he did, it speaks a beautiful language also .
But of 1st position Newton 2nd Einstein 3rd sir bacon reorientate bottom up inside out ( Richard finneman) so well articulated about what can be asked about a system and certain precautions can be said or predicted
2 | 0
The equation describes what we see. It's not necessarily the whole picture.
1 | 0
One thing will always leads to another thing
1 | 0
Carroll for Prez!
| 0
āLittle concrete poemā = Math š
1 | 0
This is the problem with physics these days, we over rely on equations and the science of experimental discovery seems to have been lost.
I have a big problem with theories where assumptions are made then simply built upon again and again with little thought about the validity of those assumptions.
When I studied physics back in the day ! , there was a big focus on experimental verification. I am saddened by the new RIDICULOUS theories coning out of the mouths of so called respected physicists, e.g. we live in a giant computer simulation or that there are multiple universes each with a different version of us in them ! I cannot believe physicists have let these people run with these stupid ideas which have no basis other than in science fiction movies. Why is a science pandering to Hollywood?
6 | 8
Big Bangā¦ā¦ RIPš
| 0
I think the criticism the British Royal Society offered the mathematician Ramanujan was that the equations he put out there were not derived through an elaborate mathematical method, and they asked him to derive them. So he sat down with the British mathematician G H Hardy to prove some of what he articulated as equations.
I do not see this same criticism being applied to Einstein.
By the way mathematicians today are at work even today proving both Ramanujanās equations & Einsteinās equations.
As a Tamil Hindu Brahmin, Ramanujan had a spiritual bent of mind. He would say that the goddess Namagiri would inspire him to formulate these equations.
In both Einstein & Ramanujanās cases, I do not think they could humanly using their physical brains derive these complex equations, many of which are now proven correct. Perhaps Ramanujan was right about an extraneous paranormal force guiding him to formulate these ultra complex, multidimensional equations.
3 | 0
Something to consider:
Theoretical science usually goes by finding missing pieces of math. For example, the formula for gravity is essentially the same as electrostatics (magnets and particles) on the law of attraction where it gets exponentially larger the closer two attractive/repelling forces are with the difference being gravity must have a much larger scale to have the same force as magnets/particles. Where the theory goes is that you have positive and negative charges in electrostatics, but you only have one type of known force for gravity, meaning that there should technically be a pushing force of gravity, which is where we get our ideas of cloaking devices and more recently, our ideas of UFO/advanced propulsion.
1 | 2
Bingo- needs to be broadcastš¬
| 0
@1988TheGoods
1 year ago
This is a damn good rundown of that entire field and the interplay between math and imagination
125 | 5